The amount of comments on twitter defending him, saying there's no proof he was drunk etc. If he's not pissed or on drugs and still drives like that then he shouldn't have a licence anyway.
A mate of mine says Grealish reminds him of Alan Hudson.
Not a bad parallel. I should add, given the last few posts, that I am talking ON the pitch rather than OFF although Hudson wasn't exactly an angel himself off the pitch allegedly.
I like him as a player, but he should have got a far harsher punishment. Mind you, everybody loves Ant and Dec so Ant can be forgiven for potentially killing somebody.
I like him as a player, but he should have got a far harsher punishment. Mind you, everybody loves Ant and Dec so Ant can be forgiven for potentially killing somebody.
Not defending him, bit how did Ant 'potentially kill' anyone?
I like him as a player, but he should have got a far harsher punishment. Mind you, everybody loves Ant and Dec so Ant can be forgiven for potentially killing somebody.
Not defending him, bit how did Ant 'potentially kill' anyone?
I think he means that by driving a car absolutely shit faced in the morning can potentially kill someone.
I like him as a player, but he should have got a far harsher punishment. Mind you, everybody loves Ant and Dec so Ant can be forgiven for potentially killing somebody.
Not defending him, bit how did Ant 'potentially kill' anyone?
I think he means that by driving a car absolutely shit faced in the morning can potentially kill someone.
Yes, agreed. But he didn't potentially kill someone.
The amount of comments on twitter defending him, saying there's no proof he was drunk etc. If he's not pissed or on drugs and still drives like that then he shouldn't have a licence anyway.
Also i like the fact he was wandering along the street seemingly wearing 1 slipper!
The amount of comments on twitter defending him, saying there's no proof he was drunk etc. If he's not pissed or on drugs and still drives like that then he shouldn't have a licence anyway.
Also i like the fact he was wandering along the street seemingly wearing 1 slipper!
Am surprised he didn't get done for drink driving, but am not aware of the time line
I like him as a player, but he should have got a far harsher punishment. Mind you, everybody loves Ant and Dec so Ant can be forgiven for potentially killing somebody.
Not defending him, bit how did Ant 'potentially kill' anyone?
I think he means that by driving a car absolutely shit faced in the morning can potentially kill someone.
Yes, agreed. But he didn't potentially kill someone.
Interesting isn't it.
I wonder if people have the same view that anyone driving over the prescribed speed limit is "potentially killing someone"?
The amount of comments on twitter defending him, saying there's no proof he was drunk etc. If he's not pissed or on drugs and still drives like that then he shouldn't have a licence anyway.
Also i like the fact he was wandering along the street seemingly wearing 1 slipper!
Am surprised he didn't get done for drink driving, but am not aware of the time line
I like him as a player, but he should have got a far harsher punishment. Mind you, everybody loves Ant and Dec so Ant can be forgiven for potentially killing somebody.
Not defending him, bit how did Ant 'potentially kill' anyone?
I think he means that by driving a car absolutely shit faced in the morning can potentially kill someone.
Yes, agreed. But he didn't potentially kill someone.
That is not the point. That was more luck than judgement. How many rules do you think it is ok to break.... Too common in our 'celebrity ' fraternity
It has not been denied that the behaviour in both cases (If Grealish was in fact drunk) would be illegal... Nobody has said the behaviour is okay or that it is okay for celebrities to break laws?
So Fiona challenging the line of 'Potentially Killing Somebody' when no other human was involved in their accidents is the point of her challenge on language used.
(Maybe McPartlins mum could have been potentially killed? Wasn't she in his car and partly responsible from my opinion for letting him drive)
It was rather unfortunate only 24 hours before he'd done a video or been told to do one telling people to stay indoors etc....
And he then smashed up a few cars along the way.
He did say sorry but wasn't great timing really and certainly must have been out of control to hit other cars.
Unfortunate, the new word for HYPOCRITICAL. And he got paid for bring one...
If he had been 70 they would have been asking to retest everyone over 65 etc etc even though it testosterone beer fuelled idiots like Greaslish who cause most accidents.
How about him having to take a tests again.
Personally think this should be the case. It shouldn't simply be, you can't drive for 9 months then after that you can drive as normal?
You should have to pass your test again AND to pass an advanced driving course.
If you're banned 3 times, you lose your licence for good.
I like him as a player, but he should have got a far harsher punishment. Mind you, everybody loves Ant and Dec so Ant can be forgiven for potentially killing somebody.
Not defending him, bit how did Ant 'potentially kill' anyone?
I think he means that by driving a car absolutely shit faced in the morning can potentially kill someone.
Yes, agreed. But he didn't potentially kill someone.
That is not the point. That was more luck than judgement. How many rules do you think it is ok to break.... Too common in our 'celebrity ' fraternity
The amount of comments on twitter defending him, saying there's no proof he was drunk etc. If he's not pissed or on drugs and still drives like that then he shouldn't have a licence anyway.
Also i like the fact he was wandering along the street seemingly wearing 1 slipper!
Am surprised he didn't get done for drink driving, but am not aware of the time line
He left the scene after exchanging details.
Plenty of time to get anything out of his system.
The amount of cars he damaged it's a miracle he's not still there exchanging details now, the soppy prick.
I like him as a player, but he should have got a far harsher punishment. Mind you, everybody loves Ant and Dec so Ant can be forgiven for potentially killing somebody.
Not defending him, bit how did Ant 'potentially kill' anyone?
I think he means that by driving a car absolutely shit faced in the morning can potentially kill someone.
Yes, agreed. But he didn't potentially kill someone.
Interesting isn't it.
I wonder if people have the same view that anyone driving over the prescribed speed limit is "potentially killing someone"?
I think there is a difference between driving when over the alcohol limit and driving over the speed limit.
It's a proven fact that excess alcohol impairs judgment, which is why we have laws which make this illegal. The potential damage this causes to other people is considered high enough to warrant severe penalties if you're caught under the influence. I doubt many of us will disagree with that - although it's clear there are differing opinions about whether or not the sentence imposed is harsh enough.
Speed limits are different because they are set at the maximum permitted for a particular road, up to the national speed limit of 70mph. That doesn't mean the road is safe at 70mph if you're driving in the middle of a torrential downpour, it's icy or there's heavy snow. If you caused an accident or were observed driving at a speed which is deemed to be too fast for the conditions, then you're likely to get a careless driving, driving without due care and attention or dangerous driving charge against you. Equally, if you're on an empty stretch of motorway where the surface conditions are excellent and you're doing 100mph, that may be relatively low risk - although the faster you are driving the more catastrophic the results will be if something fails (eg blowout).
I think it's probably a fair shout to say that anyone driving a car is "potentially killing someone". What matters is how we mitigate the risk by driving carefully and considerately. Important to note that Grealish was driving like a dick even if he hasn't been proved to break the drink-drive and road speed laws.
Comments
His face tells all...
I really hope it’s real.
Sorry.
No, am so not 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
England footballer Jack Grealish has been banned from driving and fined more than £80,000 for two motoring offences.
The Aston Villa captain, 25, previously admitted two counts of careless driving at Birmingham Magistrates' Court.
The offences relate to a crash in Dickens Heath, near Solihull, on 29 March, and a second incident near Villa's training ground on 18 October.
Prior to the convictions, Grealish already had six points on his licence for a speeding offence in 2018.
He has been banned from driving for nine months.
Not a bad parallel. I should add, given the last few posts, that I am talking ON the pitch rather than OFF although Hudson wasn't exactly an angel himself off the pitch allegedly.
Actually scrub that, it would mean moving to Birmingham and there’s no amount of money that would encourage me to do that.
I think he means that by driving a car absolutely shit faced in the morning can potentially kill someone.
I wonder if people have the same view that anyone driving over the prescribed speed limit is "potentially killing someone"?
Plenty of time to get anything out of his system.
So Fiona challenging the line of 'Potentially Killing Somebody' when no other human was involved in their accidents is the point of her challenge on language used.
(Maybe McPartlins mum could have been potentially killed? Wasn't she in his car and partly responsible from my opinion for letting him drive)
You should have to pass your test again AND to pass an advanced driving course.
If you're banned 3 times, you lose your licence for good.
Do you do it often?
It's a proven fact that excess alcohol impairs judgment, which is why we have laws which make this illegal. The potential damage this causes to other people is considered high enough to warrant severe penalties if you're caught under the influence. I doubt many of us will disagree with that - although it's clear there are differing opinions about whether or not the sentence imposed is harsh enough.
Speed limits are different because they are set at the maximum permitted for a particular road, up to the national speed limit of 70mph. That doesn't mean the road is safe at 70mph if you're driving in the middle of a torrential downpour, it's icy or there's heavy snow. If you caused an accident or were observed driving at a speed which is deemed to be too fast for the conditions, then you're likely to get a careless driving, driving without due care and attention or dangerous driving charge against you. Equally, if you're on an empty stretch of motorway where the surface conditions are excellent and you're doing 100mph, that may be relatively low risk - although the faster you are driving the more catastrophic the results will be if something fails (eg blowout).
I think it's probably a fair shout to say that anyone driving a car is "potentially killing someone". What matters is how we mitigate the risk by driving carefully and considerately. Important to note that Grealish was driving like a dick even if he hasn't been proved to break the drink-drive and road speed laws.