shine166 as the Queen has no re constitutional power why would we need to elect her ? I have no particular affinity to the monarchy but the achievement is remarkable and he Queen has represented out country brilliantly over 63 years.
shine166 as the Queen has no re constitutional power why would we need to elect her ? I have no particular affinity to the monarchy but the achievement is remarkable and he Queen has represented out country brilliantly over 63 years.
Congratulations to her all respect
If her only contribution is to once a year dictate to the nation about austerity, while sat on a golden chair.. Maybe it's time to scrap the royals ?. I understand they are good for tourism, but so is a museum or theme park
shine166 as the Queen has no re constitutional power why would we need to elect her ? I have no particular affinity to the monarchy but the achievement is remarkable and he Queen has represented out country brilliantly over 63 years.
Congratulations to her all respect
If her only contribution is to once a year dictate to the nation about austerity, while sat on a golden chair.. Maybe it's time to scrap the royals ?. I understand they are good for tourism, but so is a museum or theme park
Although I agree with the sentiment, it seems a bit crass to say anything other than "well done" today
Let me clarify that. Will she be the UK's last female monarch?
No. They changed the rules of succession so that the first born will take the throne, not the first born boy. Thus, even though it is Charles, William then George if George's first born is a girl then she would be Queen. I suspect that none of us will see that, however.
Who knows what gender George will choose to identify with when he's older? It's the 21st century for god sake.
I reached the milestone age of 60 just over a month ago and its incredible to note that the Queen has been on the throne for the whole of my life and then some. All of those years she has been a constant, reassuring, regal and heart-warming presence through much tumult and change. I am all for royalty and the immediate royal family (although I do think the list of hangers on needs some pruning) - long live her Majesty, I hope she continues to reign in good health and happiness.
shine166 as the Queen has no re constitutional power why would we need to elect her ? I have no particular affinity to the monarchy but the achievement is remarkable and he Queen has represented out country brilliantly over 63 years.
Congratulations to her all respect
If her only contribution is to once a year dictate to the nation about austerity, while sat on a golden chair.. Maybe it's time to scrap the royals ?. I understand they are good for tourism, but so is a museum or theme park
Although I agree with the sentiment, it seems a bit crass to say anything other than "well done" today
I'd say congrats for living to 100, not for 63 years in the easiest gig going.
shine166 as the Queen has no re constitutional power why would we need to elect her ? I have no particular affinity to the monarchy but the achievement is remarkable and he Queen has represented out country brilliantly over 63 years.
Congratulations to her all respect
If her only contribution is to once a year dictate to the nation about austerity, while sat on a golden chair.. Maybe it's time to scrap the royals ?. I understand they are good for tourism, but so is a museum or theme park
Although I agree with the sentiment, it seems a bit crass to say anything other than "well done" today
I'd say congrats for living to 100, not for 63 years in the easiest gig going.
Yeah, if she lives to be 100 she'll get a birthday card from the Queen. If that doesn't motivate her to last that long I don't know what will.
shine166 as the Queen has no re constitutional power why would we need to elect her ? I have no particular affinity to the monarchy but the achievement is remarkable and he Queen has represented out country brilliantly over 63 years.
Congratulations to her all respect
If her only contribution is to once a year dictate to the nation about austerity, while sat on a golden chair.. Maybe it's time to scrap the royals ?. I understand they are good for tourism, but so is a museum or theme park
Although I agree with the sentiment, it seems a bit crass to say anything other than "well done" today
I'd say congrats for living to 100, not for 63 years in the easiest gig going.
I reckon undermining the achievements of old ladies is the "easiest gig going".
When they changed the law on gay marriage did it apply to the royal family? If young George gay married a bloke would we have two kings? How would it work?
When they changed the law on gay marriage did it apply to the royal family? If young George gay married a bloke would we have two kings? How would it work?
His husband would be a prince consort. I'm not sure what would happen if they adopted children and whether they would be in line for the throne? As I'm sure it would pass to his younger sister and her children..
When they changed the law on gay marriage did it apply to the royal family? If young George gay married a bloke would we have two kings? How would it work?
His husband would be a prince consort. I'm not sure what would happen if they adopted children and whether they would be in line for the throne? As I'm sure it would pass to his younger sister and her children..
The wedding would be interesting. George would be head of the church, but wouldn't be allowed to get married in one.
When they changed the law on gay marriage did it apply to the royal family? If young George gay married a bloke would we have two kings? How would it work?
His husband would be a prince consort. I'm not sure what would happen if they adopted children and whether they would be in line for the throne? As I'm sure it would pass to his younger sister and her children..
The wedding would be interesting. George would be head of the church, but wouldn't be allowed to get married in one.
I'm sure if he was head of the church, he would be. Plus I'm hoping by that time attitudes towards gay marriage would be the same as attitudes to gay people are now, for the most part very positive, even from religious communities.
When they changed the law on gay marriage did it apply to the royal family? If young George gay married a bloke would we have two kings? How would it work?
His husband would be a prince consort. I'm not sure what would happen if they adopted children and whether they would be in line for the throne? As I'm sure it would pass to his younger sister and her children..
The wedding would be interesting. George would be head of the church, but wouldn't be allowed to get married in one.
I'm sure if he was head of the church, he would be. Plus I'm hoping by that time attitudes towards gay marriage would be the same as attitudes to gay people are now, for the most part very positive, even from religious communities.
But as the Royal family converted to Islam in 2028 and the boyfriend is Jewish I can still see a few difficulties
When they changed the law on gay marriage did it apply to the royal family? If young George gay married a bloke would we have two kings? How would it work?
His husband would be a prince consort. I'm not sure what would happen if they adopted children and whether they would be in line for the throne? As I'm sure it would pass to his younger sister and her children..
The wedding would be interesting. George would be head of the church, but wouldn't be allowed to get married in one.
I'm sure if he was head of the church, he would be. Plus I'm hoping by that time attitudes towards gay marriage would be the same as attitudes to gay people are now, for the most part very positive, even from religious communities.
But as the Royal family converted to Islam in 2028 and the boyfriend is Jewish I can still see a few difficulties
Especially as after he was crowned king, he announce he was a trans woman. Would he/she have to be crowned again?
Comments
If anyone is based near the river. Going to pop down for a look shortly.
Well done, Your Majesty.
I always worry when people start tempting fate by celebrating these occasions early!
Relieved she made it.
If her only contribution is to once a year dictate to the nation about austerity, while sat on a golden chair.. Maybe it's time to scrap the royals ?. I understand they are good for tourism, but so is a museum or theme park
One of the greatest things about us as a country and nation
God bless queenie reign as long as you feel able
And feck off and die anyone who says anything against her (note. Her NOT the rest of them...)
If young George gay married a bloke would we have two kings?
How would it work?
Would he/she have to be crowned again?