STATBANK: Charlton 0-3 Preston north End

lancashire lad

many thanks to the 91 brave souls who gave their marks and gave me about the most depressing job I've had doing these stats, before you ask this is the worst this season and over the past 3 seasons they are:
2014-15
Worst average 3.76 Watford away
Worst performance Wilson at Watford A 2.58

2013-14
Worst average Doncaster away 4.20
Worst performance Evina Birmingham H 3.00

2012-13 (pre Sprouts)
Worst average Nottingham Forest away 5.24
Worst performance Seabourne Ipswich H 3.20

anyway here it is if you can bear to look:

AFKABartram

I always feel that a lot of posters mark childishly harshly after a defeat. But when you think about it, a team mark of 4.2 out of 10 for a 3-0 awful home defeat against a bottom team who hadn't won in 8, I don't think anyone can argue that is harsh

Ben18

You're missing Jackson from your player stats LL

lancashire lad

thanks Ben, Think I'll have to put him with the defenders

ateamofcorygibbs

Honestly don't remember who Seabourne was. Did he play many other games?

Viewfinder

ateamofcorygibbs said:

Honestly don't remember who Seabourne was. Did he play many other games?

Not recalling Dan Seaborne is understandable: a defender, he played seven games for us on loan from Southampton in 2012-13. Now at Partick Thistle

Covered End

ateamofcorygibbs said:

Honestly don't remember who Seabourne was. Did he play many other games?

You don't remember the legend that is Dan Seabourne ?

You couldn't have been there for the Valley game (can't remember the oppo), when the ball fell from the sky and he tried to trap it, only for it to ricochet, wildly off his foot. It truly was a memorable moment (even though I can't remember it clearly LOL).

bolloxbolder

Covered End said:

ateamofcorygibbs said:

Honestly don't remember who Seabourne was. Did he play many other games?

You don't remember the legend that is Dan Seabourne ?

You couldn't have been there for the Valley game (can't remember the oppo), when the ball fell from the sky and he tried to trap it, only for it to ricochet, wildly off his foot. It truly was a memorable moment (even though I can't remember it clearly LOL).

Ipswich boxing day mate. Mind you Stephens was worse and got subbed at ht.

Addickted2TheReds

2.64 for Bergdich. Is that the worst ever?

Leuth

Covered End said:

ateamofcorygibbs said:

Honestly don't remember who Seabourne was. Did he play many other games?

You don't remember the legend that is Dan Seabourne ?

You couldn't have been there for the Valley game (can't remember the oppo), when the ball fell from the sky and he tried to trap it, only for it to ricochet, wildly off his foot. It truly was a memorable moment (even though I can't remember it clearly LOL).

Nah, it was that the ball was sailing out for a Charlton throw, but he somehow let it hit him on the way out.

Twice.

In the same game.

Lowest ever is Wilson at Watford as above btw

lancashire lad

Leuth is right about Laurie, he is the lowest - I just checked

Addickted2TheReds

Sorry, I only looked at the Statbank, not the text.

soapboxsam

lancashire lad said:

Leuth is right about Laurie, he is the lowest - I just checked

The game when every one was crap ?

And we were lucky to get nil.

And Watford were unlucky not to get 10.

Watford is the best of times 4-3 win on new years day and JJ scores the winner
in front of the away end.

Watford is the worst of times, that 5-0 defeat.

At least at boxing they stop it when your taking too much punishment !

Dazzler21

Addickted2TheReds said:

2.64 for Bergdich. Is that the worst ever?

No idea how Lawrie is lower than Zacharya I never thought Lawrie was that bad... but saying that I've only seen Bergdich a couple of times.

redman

average of 4.18 seems high. To me this was a far worse performance than at Watford last year. Watford were actually a pretty good side who were at the peak of their form and then went up. Preston are likely to get relegated.

Stig

Lancs, you deserve this!

lancashire lad

thanks Stig, will I need a bar for it after tomorrow, let's hope not

cafcfan

AFKABartram said:

I always feel that a lot of posters mark childishly harshly after a defeat. But when you think about it, a team mark of 4.2 out of 10 for a 3-0 awful home defeat against a bottom team who hadn't won in 8, I don't think anyone can argue that is harsh

There are eleven possible ratings (not counting half marks) from zero to ten. So, surely an entirely average performance is 5.5?
On that basis It is difficult to imagine how it ended up with a team performance anywhere near as high as 4.2. That sort of mark should get you an away draw against a mid-table team, surely? Not a thrashing from rubbish at home while we displayed close to zero attacking intent. Far too generous.

Stig

I always start out with a baseline of 6. If people do a little better than I'd expect they get a 7 a lot better an 8. To get higher than that it has to be a brilliant performance, A little worse than baseline and they get 5, significantly worse and they're on a 4. To get three or lower, you probably need to be Mr and Mrs Bergdich's little boy.

cafcnick1992

The Dan Seaborne incident was hilarious because he tried to leave the ball to go out with his left foot but accidentally kicked it with his right