Arsenal watching Lookman
Comments
-
His legs have gone.28
-
Undisclosed fee. Gone in January, Pinocchio just won't be able to help herself.4
-
Lots of clubs look at lots of players, all the time. Means nothing. Now if they come in with a £5m offer, do we accept or turn it down?1
-
I think you meant to say does Roland accept it or not. And we all know the answer to that if £5m was the offer.Pedro45 said:Lots of clubs look at lots of players, all the time. Means nothing. Now if they come in with a £5m offer, do we accept or turn it down?
1 -
This is precisely our business model now. Whereas Murray and Varney may have dreaded interest, agents turning heads and having to fend off bids the new mob have explicitly stated that turnover of academy products is their way forward and therefore will be positively salivating at the prospect of a club offering a couple of million for our most exciting young prospect since poyet and gomez.colin1961 said:Why don't these teams just let these kids enjoy playing and learning the game ....again we will have a young man who head will be turned or an agent who sees a pay day
Don't just blame the buying club. It takes 2 to make a sale and we've made it abundantly clear to the world we are in the business of selling potential stars asap rather than investing in a suitable manager and backing him to build a team around such players.32 -
Karel Fraeye said in his press day yesterday a couple of decent things about Lookman. he said that lets make him a good Championship player first before we say he will be a good Premiership player. He also said we ought not to 'burn him'.
In yesterdays press day interview Fraeye was back to the chirpy bloke, rather than the battered bloke post Ipswich. Fraeye maintained that we were harshly treated by the magnitude of the Ipswich result, which worried me that he was looking a little bit too hard for excuses, but he admitted the first goal should have been cleared before the foul on Solly.
Fraeye continues to talk quite a convincing game, but after a succession of managers we are left, still, with only being able to properly judge them on results. If Fraeye thinks it is because we are under resourced player wise, then he must simply tell Roland that Lookman is not for sale at all.
It would do his standing a lot of good if he told Roland and also us that losing Lookman would be another wrong move.5 -
It's pretty obvious that there's a lot of potential there. He'll be moved on in January. I hope he has a good career at a proper club.3
-
There we goPedro45 said:Lots of clubs look at lots of players, all the time. Means nothing. Now if they come in with a tribunal fee at the end of the season, do we spend it on a house DJ or shiny new seats?
5 -
I agree with that. We're a joke right now. Still I support the team 100% and though i'd be glad to see any of them go, it is what it is. They're better off elsewhere.Friend Or Defoe said:It's pretty obvious that there's a lot of potential there. He'll be moved on in April. I hope he has a good career at a proper club.
1 -
Sponsored links:
-
I'm not surprised .. he's a star already .. a superstar in the making .. IF .. he can maintain progress and a level head .. it's inevitable that all super talented players will end up at a major club sooner or later0
-
+ add ons, say if he scores a hatrick in the world cup final we get an extra 100kLenGlover said:
Now if they come in with a £1m offer, do we accept or turn it down? Corrected for you and the answer is accept.Pedro45 said:Lots of clubs look at lots of players, all the time. Means nothing. Now if they come in with a £1m offer, do we accept or turn it down?
2 -
Two words:
'Sales Target'
That being said, to infer we are not a proper club is a bit extreme. I don't agree with a lot of things in how we are run currently but we are still a proper club.
Lookman doesn't 'deserve better than us'. We gave him his first chance of pro football, I would imagine he is delighted and very pro Charlton. Hope he stays a couple of years.4 -
Shiny seats will not stay shiny for long as there will be no bums on them to polish them!.3
-
Another symptom (if true) of the Premier League having too much money. A few million quid punt for them is absolutely feck all yet clubs just one league below in the championship are financially compelled to accept the bid.
I hate the PL and all it stands for.25 -
Lets not forget that, as good as he has looked at times, he hasn't scored a senior goal yet.7
-
Every opportuntiy he has had, he has seemed to create himself. With some proper service, we will see goals.0
-
I clearly remember Richard Murray telling us when the RD circus rolled into town that the days when we had to sell our young stars to keep afloat were over. I used to like RD. Now it seems our entire raison d'etre is to fatten up youngsters to sell on for a quick buck, and our CEO is so dimwitted that our players are pointlessly cheap. So we have to call every deal 'undisclosed'. Sounds like we are ashamed of our prices, and after the Gomez sale, it's not a surprise.
Thanks Richard.3 -
Watching doesn't mean a great deal. Wasn't long ago Arsenal were said to be watching Cousins.
http://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/arsenal-are-watching-jordan-cousins-but-he-s-only-focused-on-charlton-survival-9216342.html
The year before there was a lot of excitement around Harriott.
http://www.forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/54203/callum-harriott/p1
Don't think we need to worry about Lookman this early. As an attacking player he needs to show he's got goals/assists in him and that won't come without a run of games.1 -
All our acquisitions are undisclosed as wellken_shabby said:I clearly remember Richard Murray telling us when the RD circus rolled into town that the days when we had to sell our young stars to keep afloat were over. I used to like RD. Now it seems our entire raison d'etre is to fatten up youngsters to sell on for a quick buck, and our CEO is so dimwitted that our players are pointlessly cheap. So we have to call every deal 'undisclosed'. Sounds like we are ashamed of our prices, and after the Gomez sale, it's not a surprise.
Thanks Richard.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Just as they were under Slater and Jimenez.killerandflash said:
All our acquisitions are undisclosed as wellken_shabby said:I clearly remember Richard Murray telling us when the RD circus rolled into town that the days when we had to sell our young stars to keep afloat were over. I used to like RD. Now it seems our entire raison d'etre is to fatten up youngsters to sell on for a quick buck, and our CEO is so dimwitted that our players are pointlessly cheap. So we have to call every deal 'undisclosed'. Sounds like we are ashamed of our prices, and after the Gomez sale, it's not a surprise.
Thanks Richard.
0 -
Arsenal are probably watching 1,000 players right now (literally) I wouldn't panic yet.6
-
Fixed it again LenLenGlover said:
Corrected for you and the answer is accept.Pedro45 said:Lots of clubs look at lots of players, all the time. Means nothing. Now if they come in with a
£1m offer£250k upfront, Joel Campbell on loan until 5pm today and a friendly against an Arsenal trailist XI in July, do we accept or turn it down?1 -
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
Arsenal, if anything, need an experienced central midfielder, with their crippling injury list. Expect a £10m offer for Jackson in JanuaryJessieAddick said:I just read these two articles back to back and found it really funny that the first few paragraphs of both pieces are almost identical. So.... yeah, probably nothing much to worry about.
http://www.espnfc.com/blog/transfer-talk/79/post/2634285/man-united-tracking-charlton-morgan-fox-as-shaw-replacement
http://metro.co.uk/2015/12/04/arsenal-chasing-young-charlton-striker-ademola-lookman-after-successful-scouting-mission-5543413/
6 -
It does. Why not try the alrnative route though. Get an experienced manager and support him over three or four seasons in the transfer market giving the club at least a chance of getting its nose into the Premier League trough instead of the current half baked plan.colin1961 said:People are saying the club will sell , RD wants the cash that's just total bollocks the fact is a club like ours at times have to sell a player to balance the books ... Next season you will be having teams coming down with 90 mill pounds in the their pockets due to new TV and parachute deals how can a club like our compete with that ??
Look at Sky money last week that was Ipswich 11th appearance on TV since they last was on against us , compete that with how many times we have been 2 ?? again we are losing out money wise
All this makes it impossible for clubs like Charlton to turn down offers for anyone
4 -
Or you grow a pair of bollocks and decide to be more than a mere feeder team for bigger clubs, keep hold of your up and coming stars for as long as possible, get in a good manager who isnt surprised at the quality of the championship to build a team around poyet, gomez, cousins and lookman with proven quality players beyond a completely deflated network and some random data analysis bods.colin1961 said:People are saying the club will sell , RD wants the cash that's just total bollocks the fact is a club like ours at times have to sell a player to balance the books ... Next season you will be having teams coming down with 90 mill pounds in the their pockets due to new TV and parachute deals how can a club like our compete with that ??
Look at Sky money last week that was Ipswich 11th appearance on TV since they last was on against us , compete that with how many times we have been 2 ?? again we are losing out money wise
All this makes it impossible for clubs like Charlton to turn down offers for anyone
Penny rich pound stupid the current way. Gutless philosophy to say we have to sell all our youth so cheaply, cheaply in every sense.11 -
This content has been removed.
-
It is hard to keep players yes.colin1961 said:
Your missing a big point the club were helpless in keeping Poyet and Gomez and it does not matter if Lookman signs a five year deal any club with excessive amount of money to spend and to offer him and his family money beyond their dreams he will go , no matter what Charlton .RodneyCharltonTrotta said:
Or you grow a pair of bollocks and decide to be more than a mere feeder team for bigger clubs, keep hold of your up and coming stars for as long as possible, get in a good manager who isnt surprised at the quality of the championship to build a team around poyet, gomez, cousins and lookman with proven quality players beyond a completely deflated network and some random data analysis bods.colin1961 said:People are saying the club will sell , RD wants the cash that's just total bollocks the fact is a club like ours at times have to sell a player to balance the books ... Next season you will be having teams coming down with 90 mill pounds in the their pockets due to new TV and parachute deals how can a club like our compete with that ??
Look at Sky money last week that was Ipswich 11th appearance on TV since they last was on against us , compete that with how many times we have been 2 ?? again we are losing out money wise
All this makes it impossible for clubs like Charlton to turn down offers for anyone
Penny rich pound stupid the current way. Gutless philosophy to say we have to sell all our youth so cheaply, cheaply in every sense.
This is not new we have sold players to survive for years why back to players like Mike Bailey, Paul Walsh , Lee Bowyer so it's not the owners of managers fault when big clubs tempt them away
However it is not hard, given the money swilling around in the premiership, to get a fair price for those players if the will is there and the negotiator is half competent.
Raheem Sterling was sold for £49m Joe Gomez £3.5m, a derisory fee which explains Meire's desperation to suppress it or, to use her preferred phrase, not disclose it.
I accept attacking players are valued more highly than defenders but not £45.5m more!
We were robbed and will be again. To be fair Meire is not alone historically (although that will not interest her of course) arguably Len Glover and Darren Bent are the only full value transfer fees we have received in my 52 years of supporting the Club. Some might say Parker but more than 10 years on he has still not been properly replaced which makes that £10m look cheap.
Nevertheless I cannot recall an example of selling a player at such a marked discount as we did Gomez.5
