Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Anger reaching MSM
Comments
-
Personally I think this is the most damming article yet by a national newspaper on the RD ownership at CAFC.
I expect the media to be all over this.9 -
Such a good article, explains the situation very well. Such a sad state of affairs for OUR club, lets get our voices heard for tommorow!!!!!!3
-
Great article6
-
Momentum, momentum.
Our star rises, theirs is obscured. We stand firm, they quake.
In Unity shall we conquer.1 -
It's mainly lifted from VOTV!0
-
Great article. Spot on.0
-
Just replied to the other threads on this topic (so apologies to anyone reading this again):
Unfortunately if we're honest with ourselves we're gonna need the dastardly tabloids onside to really reach the masses.
Why hasn't Kelvin Mackenzie (*shudder*) been more proactive in his "column"?0 -
I have no idea why I received a 'flag' for merely supporting a post in a national newspaper as 'abuse'........ken from bexley said:Personally I think this is the most damming article yet by a national newspaper on the RD ownership at CAFC.
I expect the media to be all over this.
Perhaps the moderators might wish to review that action.?0 -
Brilliant article.0
-
Brilliant article, gets all the issues from recruitment, managers, arogance and the shambles off the pitch all in their0
- Sponsored links:
-
I don't care where it was lifted from, it was the best article in the national press yet.3
-
Great article and lots of comments from non-Charlton fans below. This message needs to be spread far and wide, Meire should become a laughing stock like the Venkys.0
-
May have been a mistake, I've nearly flagged people a few times as I scroll down on my phone.ken from bexley said:
I have no idea why I received a 'flag' for merely supporting a post in a national newspaper as 'abuse'........ken from bexley said:Personally I think this is the most damming article yet by a national newspaper on the RD ownership at CAFC.
I expect the media to be all over this.
Perhaps the moderators might wish to review that action.?1 -
Hope so, i have no objection to people wishing to disagree with me, that is the whole point of this website, hopefully the moderators will review this and modify the posting. I neither know the author of the article or the poster, just thought it was a good article........ jeez!PassItToLeaburn said:
May have been a mistake, I've nearly flagged people a few times as I scroll down on my phone.ken from bexley said:
I have no idea why I received a 'flag' for merely supporting a post in a national newspaper as 'abuse'........ken from bexley said:Personally I think this is the most damming article yet by a national newspaper on the RD ownership at CAFC.
I expect the media to be all over this.
Perhaps the moderators might wish to review that action.?0 -
Did we sell Diego Poyet? Thought he walked at the end of his contract.0
-
Reads very much like Inspector Sands' excellent summary of events. Did the Inspector pitch it to the Guardian or did they lift it? either way it's important our plight gets wider recognition.0
-
“I’m not perfect,” he said in response, “but now we understand each other better and that’s why we have signed a charter that stipulates that fans will have a say in issues that closely affect them such as facilities and ticket prices.”
So he's saying that it's his money/club/risk/ball/game/toy, so he'll say exactly what happens regarding the Club (which to a certain extent I can sympathise with), it's when he say that all the fans are entitled to have an opinion on is the state of the bogs and the cost of a ticket, smacks of an arrogant tnuc to me that0 -
Phone scroll fat finger.0
