Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

Club Official Website Ridiculous .... easy regime target

needlessneedless
in General Charlton
If we are serious about attacking the regime lets aim some effort at its digital genitalia and media organs.

The club's official website content is badly maintained and full of fluffed up unprofessional dross. This is probably because they "released" backroom staff who knew what they were doing - much as they did with the playing staff.

For example - The January Poll on our beloved club's website home page (still) invites us rate how much we are looking forward to our "forthcoming FA Cup campaign" ... and this nearly two weeks after the campaign ended at Colchester .... useless ...embarrassing.

Let's expose site the and all its naff content, double-speak to massive ridicule in every type of media (Twitter and the rest), pass on the howlers to local and national rags and newspaper websites... whatever it takes. I reckon a kick in the media organs can be quite painful and will get noticed.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    MiserableoldgitMiserableoldgit
    What does the "page 3 stunner" in the sun say about it ?
  • Options
    CafcWestCafcWest
    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?
  • Options
    AlgarveaddickAlgarveaddick
    The message from the club's facebook presence suggesting we "Pick up tickets" for the Bristol game. Is it a deliberate wind up to those bemoaning the ticket office being closed two days a week, or is it just stunning naivety?
  • Options
    Brendan_O_ConnellBrendan_O_Connell
    The website is poorly maintained and often littered with mistakes. I don't really bother with it anymore as most Charlton news is on here before it is on there.
  • Options
    RanTooFarRanTooFar
    Somebody needs to continually DDOS the ticket site and website in general. They wouldn't have a clue
  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    Peter_GPeter_G
    RanTooFar said:

    Somebody needs to continually DDOS the ticket site and website in general. They wouldn't have a clue

    Neither do I. DDOS?
  • Options
    WestCountryAddickWestCountryAddick
    Peter_G said:

    RanTooFar said:

    Somebody needs to continually DDOS the ticket site and website in general. They wouldn't have a clue

    Neither do I. DDOS?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack

    It's basically how groups of hackers take down websites.
  • Options
    YoungFishCosta4tuneYoungFishCosta4tune
    Disappointed, thought this was gonna be a cyber attack suggestion.
    Think someone may have floated the idea before. Obviously it's naughty & illegal but could you imagine if the official CAFC website/social media pages were hacked and were satirised into posting the truth a la the Charlton parody account on twitter?
    Would be impossible for them to ignore.
  • Options
    OllywozereOllywozere
    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
  • Options
    CafcWestCafcWest
    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    Cheers @Ollywozere. See they both say 4.5 years now. One hell of a contract.
  • Options
    boggzyboggzy
    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Almost every step they take seems to be geared towards destroying the club.
  • Options
    JarmanJarman
    YoungFishCosta4tune said:

    Disappointed, thought this was gonna be a cyber attack suggestion.
    Think someone may have floated the idea before. Obviously it's naughty & illegal but could you imagine if the official CAFC website/social media pages were hacked and were satirised into posting the truth a la the Charlton parody account on twitter?
    Would be impossible for them to ignore.

    Or better still somehow get the powerpoint response to Katrien Meire youtube video to be played through the big screen during a game.
    I'd like to see KM ignore that!
    Also imagine the press reaction, they'd have a lot to say about it and it would really help underline our message to the masses.
  • Options
    SwisdomSwisdom
    boggzy said:

    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Almost every step they take seems to be twisted and interpreted as them destroying the club.
    Fixed that for you.

    He's respected and highly rated at Liege. We've been shipping goals at a ridiculous rate lately so have moved to stop it.

  • Sponsored links:


  • Options
    The Red RobinThe Red Robin
    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Maybe Riga will get a cut. ;-)
  • Options
    limeygentlimeygent
    edited January 2016
    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Looks like some kind of "settlement" to me. Surprised SL would do any kind of business with RD.
  • Options
    kings hill addickkings hill addick
    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Although I completely agree with that the flip side is that if he does turn out to good we will be able to command a decent fee if we sell him next summer, as unlikely as that might be. The wages are also important. If he isn't earning too much we don't need to worry about the four years five months he will have left once we realise he's not good enough and farm him off to Upjest on loan.
  • Options
    kings hill addickkings hill addick
    Ollywozere said:

    A rather roundabout way of asking us to change the poll, but we'll get right on that first thing!

    Olly if the club are struggling for a new poll I could think of a few that would generate some interest from the customers. Feel free to message me and I'll share them with you.
  • Options
    sam3110sam3110
    Algarveaddick said:

    Swisdom said:

    boggzy said:

    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Almost every step they take seems to be twisted and interpreted as them destroying the club.
    Fixed that for you.

    He's respected and highly rated at Liege. We've been shipping goals at a ridiculous rate lately so have moved to stop it.

    Four and a half years? Really? They wouldn't give Yann two years, but this guy gets four and a half. C'mon Swisdom, get real mate.
    Yann was 32 Jorge is 29, so 4.5 years is 1.5 years after his 32nd birthday. Defenders tend to mature and peak later than strikers, and usually retire later.
  • Options
    ross1ross1
    Airman Brown said:

    Swisdom said:

    boggzy said:

    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Almost every step they take seems to be twisted and interpreted as them destroying the club.
    Fixed that for you.

    He's respected and highly rated at Liege. We've been shipping goals at a ridiculous rate lately so have moved to stop it.

    Indeed, he may be a good signing and Riga ought to know. It's unfortunate that he comes from Standard Liege presentationally in the light of Murray's comment and fair to note the inconsistency, I think, but it doesn't preclude him being a good player for us in our current situation.

    However, it is still extraordinary to give an untested (in Britain) player who will be 30 this year a four and a half year contract - and it comes from the same regime that gave Christophe Lepoint a two and a half year contract aged 30. He lasted five months, remember.
    I think Murray made the comment about 5 newcomers before Riga was appointed and if Tex is Riga's choice we should still see 2 more player coming in, although with Watt not going to Cardiff, I will not hold my breath. I do agree 4.5 year contract for him is over the top, (not that he will be here in 4.5 years), but look at the contracts given to many of our summer signings who cannot get in a struggling team
  • Options
    Airman BrownAirman Brown
    edited January 2016
    sam3110 said:

    Algarveaddick said:

    Swisdom said:

    boggzy said:

    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Almost every step they take seems to be twisted and interpreted as them destroying the club.
    Fixed that for you.

    He's respected and highly rated at Liege. We've been shipping goals at a ridiculous rate lately so have moved to stop it.

    Four and a half years? Really? They wouldn't give Yann two years, but this guy gets four and a half. C'mon Swisdom, get real mate.
    Yann was 32 Jorge is 29, so 4.5 years is 1.5 years after his 32nd birthday. Defenders tend to mature and peak later than strikers, and usually retire later.
    Correct in age, but the risk of decline is also greater over four and a half years than two and a half and Yann had proven he coud play at this level, whereas Jorge hasn't.

    I suspect the contract length is to secure an overall value, e.g. if the player wanted £1m Charlton weren't willing to pay more than £250k a year.
  • Options
    kings hill addickkings hill addick
    Airman Brown said:

    sam3110 said:

    Algarveaddick said:

    Swisdom said:

    boggzy said:

    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Almost every step they take seems to be twisted and interpreted as them destroying the club.
    Fixed that for you.

    He's respected and highly rated at Liege. We've been shipping goals at a ridiculous rate lately so have moved to stop it.

    Four and a half years? Really? They wouldn't give Yann two years, but this guy gets four and a half. C'mon Swisdom, get real mate.
    Yann was 32 Jorge is 29, so 4.5 years is 1.5 years after his 32nd birthday. Defenders tend to mature and peak later than strikers, and usually retire later.
    Correct in age, but the risk of decline is also greater over four and a half years than two and a half and Yann had proven he coud play at this level, whereas Jorge hasn't.

    I suspect the contract length is to secure an overall value, e.g. if the player wanted £1m Charlton weren't willing to pay more than £250k a year.
    Also if we assume that he will not be able to secure as lucrative a deal at 32 there is a tax advantage in spreading the pay over four years rather than over two.
  • Options
    AlgarveaddickAlgarveaddick
    sam3110 said:

    Algarveaddick said:

    Swisdom said:

    boggzy said:

    Airman Brown said:

    Ollywozere said:

    cafc-west said:

    Be nice if they could get the Tex..... Stories consistent. One says 3.5 year contract and the other 4.5 years...which is it @Ollywozere ?

    Unfortunately, we were given the wrong info. We were only told it was 4.5 after publishing. Should all be in line now.
    4.5 years for an unproven (in this league) 29-year-old is thoroughly absurd, no matter how highly Riga rates him.
    Almost every step they take seems to be twisted and interpreted as them destroying the club.
    Fixed that for you.

    He's respected and highly rated at Liege. We've been shipping goals at a ridiculous rate lately so have moved to stop it.

    Four and a half years? Really? They wouldn't give Yann two years, but this guy gets four and a half. C'mon Swisdom, get real mate.
    Yann was 32 Jorge is 29, so 4.5 years is 1.5 years after his 32nd birthday. Defenders tend to mature and peak later than strikers, and usually retire later.
    Yann was proven and successful in the Championship, we have no idea how this guy will perform. Airman's suggestion seems plausible. Lets hope that this one goes against the massive amount of evidence we have of previous incompetence in signing players.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!