If its the same story I just heard on the radio. She lost her daughter to bowel cancer who been advised that even had she survived she would not have had children due to the treatment. Therefore eggs were removed prior to treatment and death. Puts a bit a bit of a twist to the story.
art for art sake, science for science sake .... scientists are very clever and very inquisitive people .. to my mind this is a step too far .. I feel very sorry for the dead lady's mum, but this is just sentimentality gone over the top
No real dad, mum in 60s, its not ideal and could I think be avoided.
Wouldn't it be better to have parents who are who have fertility issues and need the eggs but who are prepared to have the grandoarents involved in the upbringing?
I wouldn't say it's selfish, but foolish definitely.
A 60 year old woman, who will potentially miscarry that baby and will likely only be alive for 20 years of the child's life should it survive the pregnancy just isn't fair...
Surely she has some other relative/close friend that would do it? One that could be around for as long as a mum should be?
Someone of sensible age to give birth that can offer a better chance and hopefully a longer life to support the resulting baby is the better option.
I just have no idea if that can be done? Don't know anything about surrogacy.
No real dad, mum in 60s, its not ideal and could I think be avoided.
Wouldn't it be better to have parents who are who have fertility issues and need the eggs but who are prepared to have the grandoarents involved in the upbringing?
Seems to me an improvement.
Spot on.
What kind of person ensures their child will have no parents by the age of 15.
Comments
Probably be a good swimmer though #webbedfeetandhands
It's usually 'woman to give birth to her own niece or newphew' but anything is possible there.
No real dad, mum in 60s, its not ideal and could I think be avoided.
Wouldn't it be better to have parents who are who have fertility issues and need the eggs but who are prepared to have the grandoarents involved in the upbringing?
Seems to me an improvement.
A 60 year old woman, who will potentially miscarry that baby and will likely only be alive for 20 years of the child's life should it survive the pregnancy just isn't fair...
Surely she has some other relative/close friend that would do it? One that could be around for as long as a mum should be?
Someone of sensible age to give birth that can offer a better chance and hopefully a longer life to support the resulting baby is the better option.
I just have no idea if that can be done? Don't know anything about surrogacy.
What kind of person ensures their child will have no parents by the age of 15.