Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Under 21s (Match updates and news)
Comments
-
No further updates yet...0
-
Cafc43v3r said:Surprised Smith isn't getting some minutes, unless he isn't allowed?
2 -
billysboots said:Cafc43v3r said:Surprised Smith isn't getting some minutes, unless he isn't allowed?0
-
3-3
0 -
Henry Irving said:cafcdave123 said:Henry Irving said:If only there was somewhere fans could ask Chuks direct questions about his recent form this week.
Upstairs of a pub or club would be ideal, maybe somewhere close to where many Charlton fans live.
1 -
Cafc43v3r said:billysboots said:Cafc43v3r said:Surprised Smith isn't getting some minutes, unless he isn't allowed?
21st Jan last full match - on the bench for the FA cup game on the 25th. Looked to have a pattern of starting one match and then on the bench the next week.
1 -
Replying to11FULL TIME | U23s 3-3 Charlton U23s An exciting game ends in a stalemate as the hosts pinch a late, late equaliser. #cafc1
-
Was 3-3 the final result?
Thanks for the updates Henry and Dazzler.
0 - Sponsored links:
-
Cheers, Dazzler. Thanks!
0 -
Watford are top so not a bad result.2
-
I was at the game this afternoon,played at the home of St Albans City,i didn't manage to get a team sheet,but it looked like the trialist was a central defender & the sub trialist came on in the 2nd half as a striker.
Aneke played as a striker & looked very sharp until being subbed after an hour,Lapslie was subbed at half-time & looked a bit rusty,he was replaced by Odoh,Wiredu was subbed after about 70 minutes & replaced by Dempsey.
A draw was a fair result in a very entertaining competitive game.
Messrs Bowyer & Gallen were also there.19 -
Davo55 said:When Chuks is banging them in like this it makes me wonder why Lee is so adamant that he sees him as a midfield player rather than a striker. Surely worth a chance up top if we have further injury problems?
So more a forward than a midfielder, but not the main striker.0 -
The evolution of Football and positions:
Chuks Aneke is a number "10" or second striker. For a hundred years it was known as inside right or inside left, and the Number 9 was always the Centre Forward.
Forwards can be wingers, main striker, second striker ("10")
Lyle Taylor and Karlan Grant worked so well because they were both main strikers and "wingers". When Taylor was down the middle, Grant was out wide and vice versa.
Frank Lampard was technically a midfield player but scored 231 goals at a ratio of 1 in 3 games so took up positions that many second strikers occupied.
I know 80% of you know this already but for the few that still get confused Aneke has been so far in his career a number 10 or second striker.5 -
He is such a unit that he will have a huge physical advantage playing U23 footy so not sure goals are a great guide to how he would perform in the first team; but it will give him fitness and confidence and I still reckon an on his game Aneke would be some player at Championship level.7
-
To be fair to Aneke, injuries have prevented him having the run in the team he needs. I think he could yet turn out to be a great signing for us.5
-
Such a pity Chucks was injured just when we needed him and he could have had a run in the team. Never easy coming on as a sub when everyone needs you to score. Everything other than a goal is going to disappoint and that leads to harsh judgements.
He is fit enough for at least 20 minutes and I would be surprised if he does not make the bench Saturday.
A striker on form has got to be a better choice.
How well did the trialists play?4 -
At the start of the season didn't Bowyer suggest him playing at the tip of the diamond, or was just something that was proposed on here?3
-
Talal said:At the start of the season didn't Bowyer suggest him playing at the tip of the diamond, or was just something that was proposed on here?
That said if he is fit I would prefer him to Hemed as an option off the bench (an I actually think there is a player in Hemed).4 - Sponsored links:
-
Covered End said:Davo55 said:When Chuks is banging them in like this it makes me wonder why Lee is so adamant that he sees him as a midfield player rather than a striker. Surely worth a chance up top if we have further injury problems?
So more a forward than a midfielder, but not the main striker.1 -
Chuks looks to have lost a bit of muscle mass. Wonder if this is on purpose?0
-
Dazzler21 said:Chuks looks to have lost a bit of muscle mass. Wonder if this is on purpose?2
-
killerandflash said:Dazzler21 said:Chuks looks to have lost a bit of muscle mass. Wonder if this is on purpose?3
-
-
Dazzler21 said:killerandflash said:Dazzler21 said:Chuks looks to have lost a bit of muscle mass. Wonder if this is on purpose?
(Very much my opinion on a lot of injuries)4 -
cantersaddick said:Talal said:At the start of the season didn't Bowyer suggest him playing at the tip of the diamond, or was just something that was proposed on here?
That said if he is fit I would prefer him to Hemed as an option off the bench (an I actually think there is a player in Hemed).9 -
Going off at a complete tangent, but it was being discussed anyway.
No 10 is the most broad stroke of a discription of a player I think that is used in "modern" football. I don't know if its the championship manager effect or the over saturation of sky TV pundits trying to justify themselves.
As the term has become more used it has basically become meaning less, it now sort of covers anyone who plays centrally but not off the last man and doesn't track back. But that could be also a false 9, an 8 and a half, the point of the diamond, the middle of a 3.
Anyway, is Chucks one? Now he is because of lazy use stereotypes and Bowyer using language that he knows his audience will understand.
Rant over.0 -
Surely Chuks can be on the bench now. Much better option than Hemed to bring on with 15-20 mins to go.1