So, ideally id like to go on as many short breaks away as I can, typically 4 days or so I can go to loads of different places.
Working on shifts makes this a bit awkward as I dont have set days off.
When it comes to booking time off, a few people have been up to see the boss already about short breaks, 2 days here and there. He has been requesting that they book off the entire week in which they want those days off. Obviously, that a quarter of the holiday allowance gone in one go, which is not ideal.
Just wondering where I stand on this when I go up to speak to him about mine, because I certainly dont want to book full weeks off when I dont need them.
0
Comments
Sounds like it might be a union issue.
I think the reason behind it is so that we dont get short of people on the floor and makes it easier for him to sort out holiday. Just wondering if I can say no I dont want that.
He's entitled to cite company need to cover but it's a bit unreasonable to say you have to take a full week.
Maybe offer to cover for others or to have a pairing system so you dont take leave when others do.
Mine used to state I had to take at least one full week within the year but that was not compulsory to have five days at a time.
What about days off for weddings, funerals or medical appointments?
This sounds unworkable to me unless already in your contract.
All you can do is ask for a chat with the owner in private, keep your cool and see if there is an amicable compromise as to the way forward. If no joy and this is the straw that breaks the camel's back in terms of the employer / employee relationship maybe it's time to look elsewhere for another job.
Drastic action though if you are happy with everything else at work and if it were my son asking me for advice I would say that in the overall scheme of things you are just going to have to suck it up mate.
To your first point - no, you can't say 'no I don't want that'. By law you are entitled to a minimum of 28 days holiday (public holidays can be part of that total) but by law your employer can determine when and how those holidays are taken.
I've got no life
Big things
It's unreasonable to expect you to take an entire week when you only want a couple of days off. It's your annual leave - does the boss take an entire week off when he only wants a couple of days off?
F**k it, just go sick.......
All sorts of reasons including health and safety, and even security. Not unreasonable in my view.
That said, shift work can't be a reason to deny you leave if enough notice is given.
When I worked in financial services we were required to take 2 business weeks off consecutively once per year. The official reason was too avoid burn-out; the actual reason was because if someone else is doing your job for two weeks, and you've been up to anything dodgy, it generally gets exposed. It also serves to highlight if anyone can adequately cover your role in case you scarpered (in a lot of cases, this is an issue and I've seen cases where ex-employees have had to be tracked down because no one knew how to do some business-critical task).