Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

"The Manager is dead. Long live the Manager"

Addick Addict
Addick Addict Posts: 39,788
edited February 2017 in General Charlton
Well not quite yet anyway. But, seriously, what decent Manager could/would want to manage us?

Ignoring the three match reign of Nugent, who clearly knew that the job is a poisoned chalice and the totally inept Fraeye, the stats from Roland's 166 match reign rather prove it:

W-D-L (Average points per game)

Powell 4-2-6 (1.17)
Riga 12-8-16 (1.22)
Peeters 7-13-8 (1.21)
Matthew 0-0-1 (0.00)
Luzon 12-9-15 (1.25)
Fraeye 2-4-8 (0.71)
Slade 5-10-6 (1.19)
Nugent 2-1-0 (2.33)
Robinson 3-8-4 (1.13)

So Powell, Riga, Peeters, Luzon, Slade and Robinson have "enjoyed" a remarkably similar average between 1.13 and 1.25 points per game. And if we carry on at that rate we will have just enough to keep us out of the relegation zone. Another season of steady improvement.

The big question on our minds, though, Roland is - "are you now going to 'stick or bust' with Robinson?"

Which is different to the one you are, no doubt, currently asking our dear Katy for the umpteenth time - "how much is it going to cost me this time to sack the Manager?"

I can't help thinking, though, that the laugh is all on you. After all, for such a great businessman, you really do waste a lot of money paying people off. Especially as you could have saved yourself a shed load by not employing such a useless CEO and of course boy head scout in the first place.

The bad news for you though Roland is that you are soon going to run out of players worth enough to sell in order to cover your losses.

So, the answer to my original question the answer has now become obvious. Any Manager who wants three years pay for six months work should apply. Rather like taking Belgian chocolates from a baby.





Comments

  • jamescafc
    jamescafc Posts: 1,831
    Don't worry because every time we have improved our ranking!

    :neutral:
  • rananegra
    rananegra Posts: 3,689
    jamescafc said:

    Don't worry because every time we have improved our ranking!

    :neutral:

    If you are reading the tables standing on your head
  • I've just realised what RD is doing. We have only had one manager in the last 2 years. It is Dr Who.
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 11,985
    It feels like a 'Robinson sacked, COL interim manager til end of season' moment is coming,
  • Dansk_Red
    Dansk_Red Posts: 5,727
    KR spent half the time consulting Congo Chris who appeared to be in control of the tactics lap top, CC he had an ear piece I wonder who was instructing him?
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,255
    Good post Addick Addict - I'm going to nick the stat bit if you don't mind for an email
  • cabbles
    cabbles Posts: 15,255
    Can't find the Meire out thread and can't be fucked to do it with humour anymore

    Dear Katrien,

    Here is the record of manager wins, draws and defeats under your stewardship

    W-D-L (Average points per game)

    Powell 4-2-6 (1.17)
    Riga 12-8-16 (1.22)
    Peeters 7-13-8 (1.21)
    Matthew 0-0-1 (0.00)
    Luzon 12-9-15 (1.25)
    Fraeye 2-4-8 (0.71)
    Slade 5-10-6 (1.19)
    Robinson 3-9-4 (1.13)

    With the greatest of respect, I think it's clear to see that everything you touch turns to manure (to put it politely).

    It's clear to see that after 3 years, neither you nor Roland have a clue about running a successful football club, and the only question remains how long you intend to drag this out, and indeed, can you achieve something never been done in our history before, and take us out of the football league.

    I and 1000s of others would ask that you do the best thing for all parties, and sell up and move on.

    Things will only get worse for ALL of us

    Best Regards,

    Robert


    Sent from my iPhone
  • cabbles said:

    Good post Addick Addict - I'm going to nick the stat bit if you don't mind for an email

    Please feel free.
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    BRING BACK LUZON THEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,353
    As i have said before there are hundreds more out there this lot can try...

    They can't all be shit can they?
  • Sponsored links:



  • As i have said before there are hundreds more out there this lot can try...

    They can't all be shit can they?

    Yes they can.
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,145
    Great thread title.
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,595
    I think if he loses the next 2 he could well be a out, cue C'Ol with Jacko as assistant......
  • As i have said before there are hundreds more out there this lot can try...

    They can't all be shit can they?

    Doesn't matter who the manager is, it's like changing the steering wheel when the axle's broken.
  • SuedeAdidas
    SuedeAdidas Posts: 7,741
    Dansk_Red said:

    KR spent half the time consulting Congo Chris who appeared to be in control of the tactics lap top, CC he had an ear piece I wonder who was instructing him?

    Our tactics laptop......
  • I thought Nugent was in charge for 3 games, not 2 as stated in the opening post ?
  • I thought Nugent was in charge for 3 games, not 2 as stated in the opening post ?

    On investigation I believe that you are correct. Robinson was appointed on Thursday 24th November but actually took charge on Monday 28th November. As we drew the one game in that time it means that Nugent loses his 100% record but it doesn't actually make much difference to Robinson - in fact, after "rounding", his points average is still 1.13 per game.
  • Another part of Robinson's record ...

    Wins: 3

    Red cards: 5 (arguably should have been 6 if Holmes had been sent off for his shocking challenge against Fleetwood; heaven help us what the count will be if Kettle's in charge on Saturday)

    Has club discipline ever been so bad?
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,979

    Another part of Robinson's record ...

    Wins: 3

    Red cards: 5 (arguably should have been 6 if Holmes had been sent off for his shocking challenge against Fleetwood; heaven help us what the count will be if Kettle's in charge on Saturday)

    Has club discipline ever been so bad?

    KR will just pass it off as 'banter between the lads', that cheeky chubby scouser.
  • While I was waiting for us to score last night I had a look at each of our manager's League win percentage (number of games won from number played), which shows the same picture but perhaps more vividly:

    23.1% - Robinson
    25.0% - Slade
    25.0% - Riga
    14.3% - Fraeye
    29.4% - Luzon
    24.0% - Peeters
    43.8% - Riga
    40.4% - Powell
    41.1% - Parkinson (not including 10 as caretaker)
    31.3% - Pardew
    16.7% - Dowie
    38.0% - Curbishley
    38.6% - Curbishley / Gritt
    30.4% - Lawrence
    33.3% - Craggs
    31.0% - Mullery
    45.5% - Bailey
    33.5% - Nelson
    31.3% - Foley
    30.8% - Firmani
    28.1% - Stokoe
    37.7% - Hill
    39.5% - Trotter
    42.5% - Seed
    37.5% - Lindon
    38.7% - MacFarlane
    30.0% - Lindon
    34.0% - MacFarlane
    30.4% - Rayner

    It's worth noting that Powell presided over more games than all the subsequent incumbents put together and only Riga's 20 games produced a better percentage. Even Pardew had a better record than them.
  • Sponsored links:



  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,958

    Well not quite yet anyway. But, seriously, what decent Manager could/would want to manage us?

    Ignoring the two match reign of Nugent, who clearly knew that the job is a poisoned chalice and the totally inept Fraeye, the stats from Roland's 164 match reign rather prove it:

    W-D-L (Average points per game)

    Powell 4-2-6 (1.17)
    Riga 12-8-16 (1.22)
    Peeters 7-13-8 (1.21)
    Matthew 0-0-1 (0.00)
    Luzon 12-9-15 (1.25)
    Fraeye 2-4-8 (0.71)
    Slade 5-10-6 (1.19)
    Robinson 3-9-4 (1.13)

    So Powell, Riga, Peeters, Luzon, Slade and Robinson have "enjoyed" a remarkably similar average between 1.13 and 1.25 points per game. And if we carry on at that rate we will have just enough to keep us out of the relegation zone. Another season of steady improvement.

    The big question on our minds, though, Roland is - "are you now going to 'stick or bust' with Robinson?"

    Which is different to the one you are, no doubt, currently asking our dear Katy for the umpteenth time - "how much is it going to cost me this time to sack the Manager?"

    I can't help thinking, though, that the laugh is all on you. After all, for such a great businessman, you really do waste a lot of money paying people off. Especially as you could have saved yourself a shed load by not employing such a useless CEO and of course boy head scout in the first place.

    The bad news for you though Roland is that you are soon going to run out of players worth enough to sell in order to cover your losses.

    So, the answer to my original question the answer has now become obvious. Any Manager who wants three years pay for six months work should apply. Rather like taking Belgian chocolates from a baby.





    You're missing out Nugent - but don't worry we got rid of him.
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,435
    To put it another way, even with our most effective manager (Luzon), our points total at the end of a 46 match season would be 57.5. That is half a point less than Fleetwood fucking Town have now with 13 games still to play!!
  • sm said:

    Well not quite yet anyway. But, seriously, what decent Manager could/would want to manage us?

    Ignoring the two match reign of Nugent, who clearly knew that the job is a poisoned chalice and the totally inept Fraeye, the stats from Roland's 164 match reign rather prove it:

    W-D-L (Average points per game)

    Powell 4-2-6 (1.17)
    Riga 12-8-16 (1.22)
    Peeters 7-13-8 (1.21)
    Matthew 0-0-1 (0.00)
    Luzon 12-9-15 (1.25)
    Fraeye 2-4-8 (0.71)
    Slade 5-10-6 (1.19)
    Robinson 3-9-4 (1.13)

    So Powell, Riga, Peeters, Luzon, Slade and Robinson have "enjoyed" a remarkably similar average between 1.13 and 1.25 points per game. And if we carry on at that rate we will have just enough to keep us out of the relegation zone. Another season of steady improvement.

    The big question on our minds, though, Roland is - "are you now going to 'stick or bust' with Robinson?"

    Which is different to the one you are, no doubt, currently asking our dear Katy for the umpteenth time - "how much is it going to cost me this time to sack the Manager?"

    I can't help thinking, though, that the laugh is all on you. After all, for such a great businessman, you really do waste a lot of money paying people off. Especially as you could have saved yourself a shed load by not employing such a useless CEO and of course boy head scout in the first place.

    The bad news for you though Roland is that you are soon going to run out of players worth enough to sell in order to cover your losses.

    So, the answer to my original question the answer has now become obvious. Any Manager who wants three years pay for six months work should apply. Rather like taking Belgian chocolates from a baby.





    You're missing out Nugent - but don't worry we got rid of him.
    I did from the list but stated at the outset that he knew better than to take the job.
  • I think we would have been better off with Anne Robinson
  • Addicted
    Addicted Posts: 2,804
    Luzon truly was our Alex Ferguson
  • Those stats are grim, especially as we're in a lower division now. Yes the team has been weakened, but we're losing to Oldham and Oxford now, not Hull or Burnley.

    One thing Riga did very well in his first spell was prioritising games, getting 3 points in the "winnable" games at the expense of "giving away" the really hard games.
  • SuedeAdidas
    SuedeAdidas Posts: 7,741



    One thing Riga did very well in his first spell was prioritising games, getting 3 points in the "winnable" games at the expense of "giving away" the really hard games.

    All games are hard when you're pony.