Players Marks: Charlton v Scunthorpe
Comments
-
Rudd: 5 distribution poor, command poor
Byrne: 7
Konsa: 7
Teixeira: 8.5
Chicksen: 7 a decent LB
Jackson: 7 captain's performance
Aribo: 6 tries hard
Ulvestad: 7
Holmes: 9 was everywhere
Magennis: 6.5
Novak: 5 runs a lot with little result
Crofts: 4 the game turned for worse when he came on
Watt: 6 had bottle to take pen but obvious and silly booking
Ahearn-Grant: 6 useful addition of pace up top1 -
Rudd: 6 - on his knees at full-time, knew he'd got away with one. Bit of a clanger but otherwise good.
Byrne: 7 - technically decent, quick and problems generally didn't come down his side
Konsa: 7 - great tackle, looks classy
Teixeira: 7.5 - dominated in the air, fouled for penalty. Only criticism that he seemed a bit casual when they were coming back at us
Chicksen: 5.5 - exposed badly in 4-3-3. Take issue with how he arrows towards the touchline when he gets the ball, even in space. Lack of technical ability for me, but works hard and is fast.
Jackson: 7 - yeeesss! A bit quiet second half but puts in the legwork.
Aribo: 6.5 - wanted to see a bit more from him on the ball, not a bad game at all and well involved throughout
Ulvestad: 7 - think we've missed his creativity a bit, looked sharp
Holmes: 8.5 - combination of confidence and work rate, a couple too many touches sometimes when he could release the ball early, some lovely first touches
Magennis: 6 - looked a little frustrated but battled well and had a spell where has was knocking oppo off the ball for fun
Novak: 6.5 - very slow, but put himself about, held it up, even ventured into the channels - nothing in front of goal though
Crofts: 5.5 - am generally a big fan of what crofts does for the team, but I hope we don't try him on the left side of a 4-3-3 again
Watt: n/a - can't believe he lost that footrace just after he came on, decent pen, too big a gap between where he is now and the fitness levels he needs to be at
Ahearn-Grant: n/a - hope he gets a few run outs when we're safe0 -
Rudd 6
Byrne: 6.5
Konsa: 7.5
Teixeira: 6.5
Chicksen: 7
Jackson: 6.5
Aribo: 6.5
Ulvestad: 7
Holmes: 7
Magennis: 7
Novak: 7
Crofts: 60 -
Rudd: 5
Byrne: 6
Konsa: 7
Teixeira: 6
Chicksen: 7
Jackson: 6
Aribo: 7
Ulvestad: 6
Holmes: 7
Magennis: 5
Novak: 5
Crofts: 5
0 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 6
Konsa : 8
Teixeira: 5
Chicksen: 7.5
Jackson: 6
Aribo: 6
Ulvestad: 7
Holmes: 7
Magennis: 6
Novak: 7
Crofts: 6
0 -
Rudd: 7 One outstanding/flukey save off the back foot onto the post. Unlucky with their goal after getting fist to the ball which spun horribly.
Byrne: 7 Decent game. Getting better and probably more suited to attacking right back.
Konsa: 8 The last ditch tackle in the second half was class.
Teixeira: 7 Got caught out a few times and hit the bar.
Chicksen: 7 Stuck to his job at left back.
Jackson: 7 Cracking goal off his right peg and got stuck in where needed and broke up their midfield.
Aribo: 6 Did OK
Ulvestad: 7 Worked hard
Holmes: 7.5 Some lovely football at times and a constant threat.
Magennis: 6 Way off his levels pre-millwall.
Novak: 6 Needs to sharpen up.
Crofts: 5 Just confused.com why he came on.1 -
Rudd: 7 a point for the save onto the post.
Byrne: 5
Konsa: 7.5
Teixeira: 8
Chicksen: 7
Jackson: 8
Aribo: 7
Ulvestad: 7.5 excellent first half.
Holmes: 7.5
Magennis: 6
Novak: 6.5
Crofts: 51 -
Rudd - 6.5 (looses point for the drop)
Byrne - 6.5
Konsa - 7
Teixeira - 7
Chicksen - 7
Jackson - 7.5
Aribo - 7
Ulvestad - 6.5
Holmes - 6.5
Maggenis - 6
Novak - 6.5
Crofts - 51 -
Rudd: 7 Maybe could have done better with the save that led to their goal but that was more than cancelled out by his save from the diving header he pushed against the post
Byrne: 7 Stuck to his task and did well considering full back is not his natural position
Konsa: 7.5 One superb goal saving tackle and generally solid
Teixeira: 7 Pretty solid most of the time
Chicksen: 7 Up for it and worked hard
Jackson: 7 Extra point for the goal. An inspiration
Aribo: 7 Worked hard and stuck at it
Ulvestad: 6.5 Faded badly so loses .5 generally played well otherwise
Holmes: 8 Involved in everything positive. Worked really hard MOM
Magennis: 7 Better than he has been until he got injured
Novak: 7 Put a shift in and stretched their defence with his channel running
Crofts: 6 Did what he does1 -
Rudd: 6 - an error for their goal but, watching the Sky highlights, a very good save to deflect the point blank header onto the post.
Byrne: 6.5 - did well. Didn't get forward as much as he might have but I expect he was under instructions, given the number of goals we've conceded recently on the counter-attack.
Konsa: 7.5 - a goal saving tackle early in the second half and played well throughout.
Teixeira: 7 - solid defensively and dangerous up top at set plays.
Chicksen: 6 - a significant upgrade on Page.
Jackson: 7 - led from the front and his first half performance was the catalyst for this result.
Aribo: 6 - some nice touches.
Ulvestad: 6.5 - much better.
Holmes: 7.5 - getting back to his best form and ran himself into the ground.
Magennis: 6 - much improved. Hope he's not out for too long.
Novak: 6 - did ok, although playing him and Magennis in wider positions often meant we had only only one or two men in their box.
Crofts: 5 - difficult for him playing out of position.
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Rudd: 5.5
Byrne: 6
Konsa: 6.5
Teixeira: 7
Chicksen: 8
Jackson: 7.5
Aribo: 7
Ulvestad: 7
Holmes: 7.5
Magennis: 6
Novak: 6.5
Crofts: 60 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 6
Konsa : 7
Teixeira: 6
Chicksen: 6
Jackson: 7
Aribo: 6
Ulvestad: 6
Holmes: 7
Magennis: 6
Novak: 7
Crofts: 60 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 6
Konsa: 7
Teixeira: 7
Chicksen: 6.5
Jackson: 7
Aribo: 6
Ulvestad: 6.5
Holmes: 7.5 MOM Great effort put in
Magennis: 6.5
Novak: 6.5 His best game for Charlton & most running he's done as well.
Crofts: 5.51 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 6.5
Konsa: 7.5
Teixeira: 7.5
Chicksen: 7
Jackson: 6.5
Aribo: 6.5
Ulvestad: 7.5
Holmes: 8
Magennis: 6.5
Novak: 6
Crofts: 60 -
Ulvestad. 7. Good first half, went missing second half as he did under spade.RedChaser said:
Post it like this @JamesSeed and @Boughtonaddicks will get a notification show upJamesSeed said:
Ulvestad?Boughtonaddicks said:
Rudd: 5
Byrne: 7. Best game since his debut
Konsa: 8. Quality. Great goal saving tackle
Teixeira: 7. Looks better without Bauer
Chicksen: 7.5. Best left back by far
Jackson: 7. Goal and helped team look hungry
Aribo: 6.5. Quiet
Ulvestad:
Holmes: 8. Love his work rate even when not at his best.
Magennis: 6. Something is not right with him
Novak: 7. One of his best games. Not brilliant but improvement on effort
Crofts: 5. Wrong sub choice.
Watt: n/a. Was a big fan, out ran by lumbering centre back, looked fucked after 2 mins then acted like our saviour when scoring a pen. Still it was good though
Ahearn-Grant: n/a
.
0 -
That's slade not spade.Boughtonaddicks said:
Ulvestad. 7. Good first half, went missing second half as he did under spade.RedChaser said:
Post it like this @JamesSeed and @Boughtonaddicks will get a notification show upJamesSeed said:
Ulvestad?Boughtonaddicks said:
Rudd: 5
Byrne: 7. Best game since his debut
Konsa: 8. Quality. Great goal saving tackle
Teixeira: 7. Looks better without Bauer
Chicksen: 7.5. Best left back by far
Jackson: 7. Goal and helped team look hungry
Aribo: 6.5. Quiet
Ulvestad:
Holmes: 8. Love his work rate even when not at his best.
Magennis: 6. Something is not right with him
Novak: 7. One of his best games. Not brilliant but improvement on effort
Crofts: 5. Wrong sub choice.
Watt: n/a. Was a big fan, out ran by lumbering centre back, looked fucked after 2 mins then acted like our saviour when scoring a pen. Still it was good though
Ahearn-Grant: n/a .
I'm not very good at this.1 -
Ha ha freudulent slip, @Boughtonaddicks you could have edited the original marks post and the previous one. If it's any consolation I'm a technophobe as well, just click on the 'cog' icon to the top right of the post and click on the drop down 'Edit' box and away you go, give it a tryBoughtonaddicks said:
That's slade not spade.Boughtonaddicks said:
Ulvestad. 7. Good first half, went missing second half as he did under spade.RedChaser said:
Post it like this @JamesSeed and @Boughtonaddicks will get a notification show upJamesSeed said:
Ulvestad?Boughtonaddicks said:
Rudd: 5
Byrne: 7. Best game since his debut
Konsa: 8. Quality. Great goal saving tackle
Teixeira: 7. Looks better without Bauer
Chicksen: 7.5. Best left back by far
Jackson: 7. Goal and helped team look hungry
Aribo: 6.5. Quiet
Ulvestad:
Holmes: 8. Love his work rate even when not at his best.
Magennis: 6. Something is not right with him
Novak: 7. One of his best games. Not brilliant but improvement on effort
Crofts: 5. Wrong sub choice.
Watt: n/a. Was a big fan, out ran by lumbering centre back, looked fucked after 2 mins then acted like our saviour when scoring a pen. Still it was good though
Ahearn-Grant: n/a .
I'm not very good at this. . 0 -
DoneRedChaser said:
Ha ha freudulent slip, @Boughtonaddicks you could have edited the original marks post and the previous one. If it's any consolation I'm a technofobe as well, just click on the 'cog' icon to the top right of the post and click on the drop down 'Edit' box and away you go, give it a tryBoughtonaddicks said:
That's slade not spade.Boughtonaddicks said:
Ulvestad. 7. Good first half, went missing second half as he did under spade.RedChaser said:
Post it like this @JamesSeed and @Boughtonaddicks will get a notification show upJamesSeed said:
Ulvestad?Boughtonaddicks said:
Rudd: 5
Byrne: 7. Best game since his debut
Konsa: 8. Quality. Great goal saving tackle
Teixeira: 7. Looks better without Bauer
Chicksen: 7.5. Best left back by far
Jackson: 7. Goal and helped team look hungry
Aribo: 6.5. Quiet
Ulvestad:
Holmes: 8. Love his work rate even when not at his best.
Magennis: 6. Something is not right with him
Novak: 7. One of his best games. Not brilliant but improvement on effort
Crofts: 5. Wrong sub choice.
Watt: n/a. Was a big fan, out ran by lumbering centre back, looked fucked after 2 mins then acted like our saviour when scoring a pen. Still it was good though
Ahearn-Grant: n/a .
I'm not very good at this. .1
