The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
Word today was old director loans have been paid up.
Don't know by who or even if that is fact.18 -
TomHards said:
Steve G & our new Chairman were talking animatedly throughout whilst the guy in the cloth cap looked a sad, solitary figure....I didn't see any indication that he was involved in their conversation at all.
7 -
Bloody chuffed to bits for you.84
-
2
-
owlsonlineadmin said:Bloody chuffed to bits for you.1
-
owlsonlineadmin said:Bloody chuffed to bits for you.
I love the Championship and think it is the most competitive league in the world and it would be good to be competitive in it. Not fussed about the Premiership and would not like us to become a prawn sandwich club.
Next time we meet maybe we will have our A team available. Hope you got home safely.3 -
ShootersHillGuru said:Ultimatum said:Let’s throw 10 mil here, 15 mil there , 2 mil here etc etc... this is real money people 😂. There’s no way these new owners, regardless how rich they are will throw money away. They’re business men who got rich by being clever not throwing it around like it’s nothing.Secondly, how much can we realistically spend with FFP rules?2
-
Brown Bear said:cantersaddick said:Addickted2TheReds said:PopIcon said:0
-
Any unknowns in the director’s box today? ... sorry I forgot we were bought by a billionaire . Old habits....
6 -
KiwiValley said:Any unknowns in the director’s box today? ... sorry I forgot we were bought by a billionaire . Old habits....1
- Sponsored links:
-
Do we know if Muir got the wrong memo and tried to hand his red and white scarf back?3
-
I don’t think we should make fun of the ozzies (difficult for a kiwi to say). They understood the fans and would have connected better with them than RD. Maybe never quite pulled the money together. They lost out, we all move on.34
-
KiwiValley said:I don’t think we should make fun of the ozzies (difficult for a kiwi to say). They understood the fans and would have connected better with them than RD. Maybe never quite pulled the money together. They lost out, we all move on.
Still glad they missed out though4 -
I can't see why we should fail the EFL test unless our prospective new owner is either directly or indirectly involved in another club. Just because he may have family that owns clubs seems irrelevant.
Associations between clubs:
(a) either directly or indirectly being involved in, or having the power to determine or influence, the management or administration of another Club or Premier League Club unless a dispensation in respect of the same has been granted by the Board in accordance with Regulation 110;
(b) either directly or indirectly holding or acquiring any Significant Interest in a Club while at the same time either directly or indirectly holding any interest in any class of shares or securities of another Club unless a dispensation in respect of the same has been granted by the Board in accordance with Regulation 110;
https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/efl-rules--regulations/appendix-3---owners-and-directors-test/
5 -
blackpool72 said:KiwiValley said:I don’t think we should make fun of the ozzies (difficult for a kiwi to say). They understood the fans and would have connected better with them than RD. Maybe never quite pulled the money together. They lost out, we all move on.
Still glad they missed out though0 -
Wonder if the Aussies will move on and try to buy someone else - Plenty of other clubs here in England who could do with the help - Coventry being one of them!!2
-
Our new chairman liking chants about our economic status to come is the best thing as a Charlton fan you’ll see on Twitter this weekend 😂
22 -
BR7_addick said:Our new chairman liking chants about our economic status to come is the best thing as a Charlton fan you’ll see on Twitter this weekend 😂49
-
Covered End said:
I can't see why we should fail the EFL test unless our prospective new owner is either directly or indirectly involved in another club. Just because he may have family that owns clubs seems irrelevant.
Associations between clubs:
(a) either directly or indirectly being involved in, or having the power to determine or influence, the management or administration of another Club or Premier League Club unless a dispensation in respect of the same has been granted by the Board in accordance with Regulation 110;
(b) either directly or indirectly holding or acquiring any Significant Interest in a Club while at the same time either directly or indirectly holding any interest in any class of shares or securities of another Club unless a dispensation in respect of the same has been granted by the Board in accordance with Regulation 110;
https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/efl-rules--regulations/appendix-3---owners-and-directors-test/
0 -
Danny Addick said:Covered End said:
I can't see why we should fail the EFL test unless our prospective new owner is either directly or indirectly involved in another club. Just because he may have family that owns clubs seems irrelevant.
Associations between clubs:
(a) either directly or indirectly being involved in, or having the power to determine or influence, the management or administration of another Club or Premier League Club unless a dispensation in respect of the same has been granted by the Board in accordance with Regulation 110;
(b) either directly or indirectly holding or acquiring any Significant Interest in a Club while at the same time either directly or indirectly holding any interest in any class of shares or securities of another Club unless a dispensation in respect of the same has been granted by the Board in accordance with Regulation 110;
https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/efl-rules--regulations/appendix-3---owners-and-directors-test/
But then that could be why the Sheikhs arent on the board for us (whilst Nimer is)1 - Sponsored links:
-
KiwiValley said:I don’t think we should make fun of the ozzies (difficult for a kiwi to say). They understood the fans and would have connected better with them than RD. Maybe never quite pulled the money together. They lost out, we all move on.
I think a bit of mickey taking is fair enough.6 -
I don't want us singing about having loads of dosh. I remember Spurs fans doing that when they bought Paul Stewart. They sounded like wankers then and so would we now. We should just go about things quietly and with respect to other clubs, whilst remembering the last difficult decade.54
-
jimmymelrose said:I don't want us singing about having loads of dosh. I remember Spurs fans doing that when they bought Paul Stewart. They sounded like wankers then and so would we now. We should just go about things quietly and with respect to other clubs, whilst remembering the last difficult decade.0
-
Covered End said:Derek1952 said:We were all pleased when Roland bought the club-- then look what happend! I would prfere to wait a year or so and see where we are then.
RD was never seen in the fans bar, they are already in credit.0 -
Fanny Fanackapan said:5
-
jimmymelrose said:I don't want us singing about having loads of dosh. I remember Spurs fans doing that when they bought Paul Stewart. They sounded like wankers then and so would we now. We should just go about things quietly and with respect to other clubs, whilst remembering the last difficult decade.0
-
I thought it was great that Southall was talking to Gallen every time the camera was on him, not just watching the game. Also the statement he made. I have long thought that you give this management team the tools the sky is the limit.14
-
Things remain murky, good murky but murky. I simply want to know who actually owns us and how much money he/she/they have, and how much they would like to spend on our club.6
-
Whilst we would all want to know that, I'm sure it will be played down. We don't want to find other clubs hike their prices. The picture will become clearer in February and after the summer window but also with players like Taylor staying and the management team extending their contracts.2
-
Never one to pass up a good photo opportunity is Vince.....6