Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Most overrated films.

1235

Comments

  • Donnie Darko
    Clock work orange
  • scruffle said:

    Inception, complete dribble

    You serious?

    My favourite film ever.
  • edited June 2017
    Another vote for Anchorman. I know a lot of people that loved it, I just didn't find it remotely funny
  • Drive....drivel
  • Battleship Potempkin. Don't get what all the fuss was about.
  • PopIcon said:

    I love Kubrick and scfi, but I find Space Odyssey painful.

    ok, this is the first one that's made me scrunch up my fist and yell 'no!' at the screen (not literally, obviously, that'd be ridiculous)
  • Pulp Fiction. Dross.
  • Funny @PragueAddick I loved Cloud Atlas. I'm always drawn to that kind of film.
  • PopIcon said:

    I love Kubrick and scfi, but I find Space Odyssey painful.

    Anyone who watches space oddessy and doesn't "get it" seems to me to have an essential part of their soul missing.
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited June 2017

    PopIcon said:

    I love Kubrick and scfi, but I find Space Odyssey painful.

    Anyone who watches space oddessy and doesn't "get it" seems to me to have an essential part of their soul missing.
    Okay it's official I have no soul
  • Shutter Island is incredibly overrated.
  • Valley11 said:

    Drive....drivel

    That's a bad stutter you've got there
  • I saw Shawshank on VHS when it first came out, knew absolutely nothing about it, and loved every second of it. It's popularity and subsequent backlash can't change what I thought of it the first time I saw it, and I think many people felt that way at that time.

    @Bedsaddick - how come wth Shutter Island? I loved the final line, it made the movie for me.
  • PopIcon said:

    I love Kubrick and scfi, but I find Space Odyssey painful.

    Anyone who watches space oddessy and doesn't "get it" seems to me to have an essential part of their soul missing.
    Okay it's official I have no soul
    Me neither.

    HAL does my nut in, call me a philistine.
    I'd rather watch Barry Lyndon twice back to back, followed by the Starwars prequals (@extended versions)
  • Not a problem, just don't rate them as top ten films of all time as they are often voted. And I love game of thrones.

    Widely considered a masterpiece by old hippies and fantasy genre freaks : - ) It is nonsense. Even the lion, the witch and wardrobe and harry potter make more sense.

    And they are very derivative of Norse myths and legends as Tolkien was a professor of medieval studies or something.

    What doesn't make sense about a group of short, hairy footed people who live in beautiful countryside and eat and drink all day everyday? :)
    Aah, I see you've had the honour of meeting Mrs cafcfan then?
  • The Shawshank Redemption, American History X.

    WUM ..... surely?
  • edited June 2017

    The Shawshank Redemption, American History X.

    WUM ..... surely?
    More or less every post so far is WUM material.

    Overrated doesn't mean 'popular or classic films that I personally don't like'.
  • JiMMy 85 said:

    I saw Shawshank on VHS when it first came out, knew absolutely nothing about it, and loved every second of it. It's popularity and subsequent backlash can't change what I thought of it the first time I saw it, and I think many people felt that way at that time.

    @Bedsaddick - how come wth Shutter Island? I loved the final line, it made the movie for me.

    I suppose the main gripe I have with it is that it doesn't feel like a Martin Scorsese film. I love Scorsese but this felt like someone else has directed it.
  • Shutter island.. isn't that basically a modern remake of the cabinet of dr caligari?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Pulp Fiction. Tarantino at his pointless, self-indulgent worst. None of it matters or means anything, it's like a sketch show

    ...so you went into a film called "pulp fiction" and expected anything different?

    It's like coming out of "snakes on a plane" and complaining it had too many scenes on a plane where there were snakes.
    I got exactly what I expected; some nonsense mess. This thread is about overrated films, and Pulp Fiction is king of that; it's number 1 on Reddit's top 250 films, number 7 on imdb's top 250 etc and people describe it as one of the best films of all time. It's not even good pulp fiction.
    Well said...I saw it at the cinema and by half way through half the audience had walked out...Me and the Mrs stayed as we were paying a babysitter, otherwise we would have done. When I asked the usherettes about it when we left she said that the same had been happening since it opened its screening.
    Agree with you, Chips. Its the only film I can remember that I walked out of. I couldn't understand half the dialogue anyway, and realised I didn't want to.

    Crikey be careful its the first time we have agreed on anything
    Second time actually Chips, you were kind enough to rate my rant about the FAPL and the money, the other week.

    I'll chuck in a gratuitous "Roland Out" so you can like this too :-)

  • I think Anchorman is winning this thread. Recommended to me as it was "my humour" but only laughed once. Amusing yes, comedy classic, no.
  • Another vote for the Tolkein stuff - films and books. I can take magic and fantasy stuff, I'm a big Michael Moorcock fan for example, but LoTR is so juvenile. You've got your goodies in handsome, noble or cute varieties. And you've got your baddies - you can tell they are bad because they are very ugly and have no characteristic other than being really, really bad. Where is the nuance? Where is the dramatic tension? Where, come to that, is the plot? Why are highly intelligent people apparently satisfied with this? Grrr.
  • 24 Red said:

    Another vote for the Tolkein stuff - films and books. I can take magic and fantasy stuff, I'm a big Michael Moorcock fan for example, but LoTR is so juvenile. You've got your goodies in handsome, noble or cute varieties. And you've got your baddies - you can tell they are bad because they are very ugly and have no characteristic other than being really, really bad. Where is the nuance? Where is the dramatic tension? Where, come to that, is the plot? Why are highly intelligent people apparently satisfied with this? Grrr.

    Spot on.

    And it not just that some people like them and others don't that makes them over rated but that they are voted in the top ten films of ALL TIME.
  • Snatch, Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, A Beautiful Mind. Not bad films but overrated.
    I despise what Cameron did with his Titanic story.

    Not sure Anchorman deserves to be on this list. It's a marmite film which splits an audience. Does anyone think it's a classic?

    Pulp Fiction is a brilliant film.
  • 24 Red said:

    Another vote for the Tolkein stuff - films and books. I can take magic and fantasy stuff, I'm a big Michael Moorcock fan for example, but LoTR is so juvenile. You've got your goodies in handsome, noble or cute varieties. And you've got your baddies - you can tell they are bad because they are very ugly and have no characteristic other than being really, really bad. Where is the nuance? Where is the dramatic tension? Where, come to that, is the plot? Why are highly intelligent people apparently satisfied with this? Grrr.

    Spot on.

    And it not just that some people like them and others don't that makes them over rated but that they are voted in the top ten films of ALL TIME.
    Spot on? @24 Red criticised the plot. And the fact that the baddies are bad. That's an issue of the Tolkien books FFS. Not the films. Now, if someone encountered the films without being a fan of the book, then I can understand a reaction like 24Red's . But it's not the films' fault.

    I made sure to watch all three LoTR in the cinema, and I thought that visually they were the most staggering films I had ever seen. Some of the battle scenes were simply awesome.

    That said, I have not bothered with The Hobbit, as they are clearly cynical money grabbers. The Hobbit book is a slim volume, far smaller than any one of the three LoTR trilogies. Making multiple films out of that is taking the piss.

  • edited June 2017
    24 Red said:

    Another vote for the Tolkein stuff - films and books. I can take magic and fantasy stuff, I'm a big Michael Moorcock fan for example, but LoTR is so juvenile. You've got your goodies in handsome, noble or cute varieties. And you've got your baddies - you can tell they are bad because they are very ugly and have no characteristic other than being really, really bad. Where is the nuance? Where is the dramatic tension? Where, come to that, is the plot? Why are highly intelligent people apparently satisfied with this? Grrr.

    Lord of the rings was written under the shadow of the Second World War, where there clearly was a good an evil, possibly for the first and last time in history. In that context, it's easy to see why it's so black and white. There's also people that switch sides, sometimes multiple times, smegol and Saruman are two. The Gandalf the white portrayal is a bit darker in the books, he's said to be basically a reincarnation of Saruman but Gandalf... if that makes sense. But it is a valid criticism of the books, which GRR Martin has said is the reason why in the song of ice and fire books there's no one that's clearly good and clearly evil.

    The battle of pellinor fields is one of the best written battles in epic fantasy and is an absolute page turner.

    It's also worth noting, especially the hobbit, are children's/young adults books.
  • 24 Red said:

    Another vote for the Tolkein stuff - films and books. I can take magic and fantasy stuff, I'm a big Michael Moorcock fan for example, but LoTR is so juvenile. You've got your goodies in handsome, noble or cute varieties. And you've got your baddies - you can tell they are bad because they are very ugly and have no characteristic other than being really, really bad. Where is the nuance? Where is the dramatic tension? Where, come to that, is the plot? Why are highly intelligent people apparently satisfied with this? Grrr.

    Spot on.

    And it not just that some people like them and others don't that makes them over rated but that they are voted in the top ten films of ALL TIME.
    Spot on? @24 Red criticised the plot. And the fact that the baddies are bad. That's an issue of the Tolkien books FFS. Not the films. Now, if someone encountered the films without being a fan of the book, then I can understand a reaction like 24Red's . But it's not the films' fault.

    I made sure to watch all three LoTR in the cinema, and I thought that visually they were the most staggering films I had ever seen. Some of the battle scenes were simply awesome.

    That said, I have not bothered with The Hobbit, as they are clearly cynical money grabbers. The Hobbit book is a slim volume, far smaller than any one of the three LoTR trilogies. Making multiple films out of that is taking the piss.

    Except they are films of the books so share them same flaws.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!