Igor Vetekele to stay at St Truidan

AFKABartram

Either signing on a perm or on another loan, seems to be pretty much accepted he'll be there next season now.

https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/26096/charlton-striker-way-valley-salaries-scupper-outgoing-deals/

The_President

He was quite a hit with STVV fans last season,
STVV also have another young kid coming through scoring lots of goals, a South African called Abrahams.

Henry Irving

Assumes Charlton can agree terms with them.

The Red Robin

Henry Irving said:

Assumes Charlton can agree terms with them.

'Roland can I sign Vetokele from you? Why yes Roland, of course you can,'

palarsehater

the whole article just reminds me what a twat weve got that owns us, these multiple club owning wankers annoy me

Covered_End_Lad

The Red Robin said:

Henry Irving said:

Assumes Charlton can agree terms with them.

'Roland can I sign Vetokele from you? Why yes Roland, of course you can,'

*walking away* "why can't everyone be as easy to deal with as Roland?"

cabbles

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Henry Irving

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

he had a year on his contract. Marshall was free

Dazzler21

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Contraact termination fee? Sign on fee?

se9addick

Disappointing as I would have liked him back, hopefully we've got someone even better lined up.

Scoham

Dazzler21 said:

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Contraact termination fee? Sign on fee?

6 figure transfer fee wasn't it?

Chizz

Roland will still want 10% for negotiating the deal. From both clubs.

Viewfinder

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Punter on the Bradford forum says it was £150,000. Some of them are laughing that we actually paid for him.

Oh_Yoni_Boy

Viewfinder said:

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Punter on the Bradford forum says it was £150,000. Some of them are laughing that we actually paid for him.

Was reading some comments on their thread about Mark Marshall and they have us at 1-1 having paid for Clarke. Sounds like £100k-£150kish. Unanimous opinion seems to be that they should have paid us to take him.

se9addick

Oh_Yoni_Boy said:

Viewfinder said:

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Punter on the Bradford forum says it was £150,000. Some of them are laughing that we actually paid for him.

Was reading some comments on their thread about Mark Marshall and they have us at 1-1 having paid for Clarke. Sounds like £100k-£150kish. Unanimous opinion seems to be that they should have paid us to take him.

Player leaves club, fans of left club slag player off - always the same.

Oh_Yoni_Boy

se9addick said:

Oh_Yoni_Boy said:

Viewfinder said:

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Punter on the Bradford forum says it was £150,000. Some of them are laughing that we actually paid for him.

Was reading some comments on their thread about Mark Marshall and they have us at 1-1 having paid for Clarke. Sounds like £100k-£150kish. Unanimous opinion seems to be that they should have paid us to take him.

Player leaves club, fans of left club slag player off - always the same.

Although in the same thread they're basically all saying that losing Mark Marshall is a big loss.

cafcfan

Chizz said:

Roland will still want 100% for negotiating the deal. From both clubs.

Fixed that for you (if Lookman and Fox deals are anything to go by).

Talal

se9addick said:

Disappointing as I would have liked him back, hopefully we've got someone even better lined up.

Ajose

guinnessaddick

Scoham said:

Dazzler21 said:

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Contraact termination fee? Sign on fee?

6 figure transfer fee wasn't it?

7, Fook all.

Beardface

se9addick said:

Oh_Yoni_Boy said:

Viewfinder said:

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Punter on the Bradford forum says it was £150,000. Some of them are laughing that we actually paid for him.

Was reading some comments on their thread about Mark Marshall and they have us at 1-1 having paid for Clarke. Sounds like £100k-£150kish. Unanimous opinion seems to be that they should have paid us to take him.

Player leaves club, fans of left club slag player off - always the same.

Exactly. Always happens. I still can't believe we made a profit on Mark Hudson.

kinveachyaddick

Beardface said:

se9addick said:

Oh_Yoni_Boy said:

Viewfinder said:

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Punter on the Bradford forum says it was £150,000. Some of them are laughing that we actually paid for him.

Was reading some comments on their thread about Mark Marshall and they have us at 1-1 having paid for Clarke. Sounds like £100k-£150kish. Unanimous opinion seems to be that they should have paid us to take him.

Player leaves club, fans of left club slag player off - always the same.

Exactly. Always happens. I still can't believe we made a profit on Mark Hudson.

That would be the bloke who's in the Premier League this season?

golfaddick

Scoham said:

Dazzler21 said:

cabbles said:

I thought Clarke was a free transfer? Says in the article he cost us money

Contraact termination fee? Sign on fee?

6 figure transfer fee wasn't it?

not disclosed............so we will never know but I believe it was a 6 figure sum - hopefully not more than £150k.