Sky have said today that they are moving away from satellite-based TV and will in the future provide all services via the internet. Italy and then Austria will be the first countries to be switched.
I'm guessing that means that the channels available via satellite on Freesat will no longer be viable and that service, too, will eventually disappear?
bbc.co.uk/news/business-42815603
Comments
Works well for me!
It will be much harder for Sky to control subscriptions without the dish and box, which gave them a fair bit of control over what packages they can sell
My current speed is less than 2 mbps and BT have quoted £50k to run a private fibre network to the 8 houses in our little spot. Bastards!!!
When I do watch on the net, BBC iPlayer, All4, or once in a blue moon ITV, buffering is pretty much to be expected at some point. And it isn't my line speed which is now 25mbps plus, even with the VPN set to UK. So I make @sam3110 right.
It's the same issue with cellphones. Who hasn't in the last week experienced trouble with a call that dropped, temporarily or completely? Listen to the BBC Today programme, at least once a week an interview or link up is abandoned on air, and they have advanced gear to try and combat the problem.
22 years or so, and they still can't deliver reliable calls. WTF?
RIP
I'm sure graphs exist to show the average broadband speed 5 years ago and the availability of it compared to now. Bobmunro has a valid moan about being quoted 50k to run a private fibre network however, let's play devils advocate here. OFCOM tell British Telecom they cannot refuse a reasonable request for telephony. So it's not unusual for them to erect 20 poles to provide a remote Scottish farmhouse with a PSTN line (A phone line) but if that remote Scottish farm wants super fast broadband he's going to have to pay, look at it from a business perspective. BT will get back say 20 quid a month or thereabouts per superfast serviice they deliver and whose to say you wont decide you dont want the super fast broadband in a years time. Any business would say the cost of the investment is not worth the return.
That's not my opinion, I think from a PR perspective BT would be well served providing you that service however once they make a noise about it they have to do the same for every tiny group of remote homes everywhere.
I said years and years ago broadband speed would become a big factor in house churn and house prices and I'm not shocked to be proven right. Now the government have tendered tons of bids and largely BT are the only company winning them to do joint enterprise fibre along with local authorities
One thing this and the previous couple of governments have got right is investment in superfast broadband along with telecoms firms
I've never had satellite TV, ever.
Have I missed out on anything .... ?