This age old arguement has surfaced again, should replays be scraped.
Personally I think they should.
Shrewsbury v West Ham is a good example for me, had it gone to extra time and pens, I think Shrewsbury would have won.
But it went to a replay and West Ham won.
I have seen a few reporters tonight say that a draw and a replay is better for newport than winning, now I understand that financially, but surely the players dont think like that.
0
Comments
Regardless, replays are a great part of our game and should stay.
Same goes for replays.
What would Newport player and supporters rather have an away trip to Spurs regardless of it being at Wembley or White hart lane or getting someone like Wigan in the next round only to lose.
Up pops Harry Kane with a goal.
I am not saying thats what happened, but if you are saying they would rather have a replay, they could have let tottenham score, which is then not in the spirit of the game.
No one is saying they'd RATHER have a replay just that a replay was still a good result for them.
They would rather have won and then maybe got a big team in the next round as they did when they beat Leeds in round 3.
than us at the time, in league cup.
75031 at the first game at the Valley.
But ask any Newport fan or player if replays are a good idea... even the Shrewsbury example given in the first post, both fans and players would've been delighted with that replay.