To say 'you must be pleased' is a crap question feeding the expected answer. Why not simply ask how he feels about things?
FFS Seth, give it a rest.
Your constant slagging off of Olly and the rest of the comms team is as tedious as it is misguided.
And yes, I'll remind you that you once slagged off the official programme that you then had to admit you didn't read.
Errm if you want to go back I slagged off the official programme after I bought the first issue of that particular season because it contained the handbook. It might be better if you didn't make things up about me. if my criticism of the communications team is misguided then perhaps you would like to tell me why, persuade me even (no that is not obligatory obviously), but the tedious nature might be true if occasional comments are not allowed (although you might consider the repetitive nature of some of the stuff you write too). My comment about the first question on that clip is neither a slagging off, nor even unhelpful, it is about asking a leading question which in my opinion does not take us to very original answers. I get your loyalty to Olly and I am sure that he and others are good people, it is what is actually said and done that I criticise.
To say 'you must be pleased' is a crap question feeding the expected answer. Why not simply ask how he feels about things?
FFS Seth, give it a rest.
Your constant slagging off of Olly and the rest of the comms team is as tedious as it is misguided.
And yes, I'll remind you that you once slagged off the official programme that you then had to admit you didn't read.
Errm if you want to go back I slagged off the official programme after I bought the first issue of that particular season because it contained the handbook. It might be better if you didn't make things up about me. if my criticism of the communications team is misguided then perhaps you would like to tell me why, persuade me even (no that is not obligatory obviously), but the tedious nature might be true if occasional comments are not allowed (although you might consider the repetitive nature of some of the stuff you write too). My comment about the first question on that clip is neither a slagging off, nor even unhelpful, it is about asking a leading question which in my opinion does not take us to very original answers. I get your loyalty to Olly and I am sure that he and others are good people, it is what is actually said and done that I criticise.
Don't lie Seth, that's just not true and you either know it or you really are losing it. You admitted it at the time that you hadn't read the programme.
seth plum December 2015 Sorry folks. After more than 40 years of religiously buying the programme I stopped a couple of seasons ago. When I glance at somebody else's programme occasionally it still looks like overpriced, oversized, badly written, un-informative and deliberately misleading dross tarted up by some pretty pictures on glossy paper. I would learn more about Charlton Athletic by buying the fecking Metro which is free anyway. IMHO
So now they are good people but a few minutes ago they were "Dreary flunkies". At least be honest enough to own your own prejudices and insults for once.
It's as if no journalist ever used a leading question. It's a standard technique to start the conversation. But you just want to slag off the comms teams so you jump on this, again.
To say 'you must be pleased' is a crap question feeding the expected answer. Why not simply ask how he feels about things?
FFS Seth, give it a rest.
Your constant slagging off of Olly and the rest of the comms team is as tedious as it is misguided.
And yes, I'll remind you that you once slagged off the official programme that you then had to admit you didn't read.
Errm if you want to go back I slagged off the official programme after I bought the first issue of that particular season because it contained the handbook. It might be better if you didn't make things up about me. if my criticism of the communications team is misguided then perhaps you would like to tell me why, persuade me even (no that is not obligatory obviously), but the tedious nature might be true if occasional comments are not allowed (although you might consider the repetitive nature of some of the stuff you write too). My comment about the first question on that clip is neither a slagging off, nor even unhelpful, it is about asking a leading question which in my opinion does not take us to very original answers. I get your loyalty to Olly and I am sure that he and others are good people, it is what is actually said and done that I criticise.
Don't lie Seth, that's just not true and you either know it or you really are losing it. You admitted it at the time that you hadn't read the programme.
So now they are good people but a few minutes ago they were "Dreary flunkies". At least be honest enough to own your own prejudices and insults for once.
It's as if no journalist ever used a leading question. It's a standard technique to start the conversation. But you just want to slag off the comms teams so you jump on this, again.
I have not lied. I think you might have to do a lot of trawling back if you think you can back that up. However I won't flag you for calling me a liar because I never flag anybody. Even dreary flunkies can be good people, it takes all sorts to make a world as you demonstrate on a daily basis.
Comments
Your constant slagging off of Olly and the rest of the comms team is as tedious as it is misguided.
And yes, I'll remind you that you once slagged off the official programme that you then had to admit you didn't read.
It might be better if you didn't make things up about me.
if my criticism of the communications team is misguided then perhaps you would like to tell me why, persuade me even (no that is not obligatory obviously), but the tedious nature might be true if occasional comments are not allowed (although you might consider the repetitive nature of some of the stuff you write too).
My comment about the first question on that clip is neither a slagging off, nor even unhelpful, it is about asking a leading question which in my opinion does not take us to very original answers.
I get your loyalty to Olly and I am sure that he and others are good people, it is what is actually said and done that I criticise.
seth plum
December 2015
Sorry folks.
After more than 40 years of religiously buying the programme I stopped a couple of seasons ago.
When I glance at somebody else's programme occasionally it still looks like overpriced, oversized, badly written, un-informative and deliberately misleading dross tarted up by some pretty pictures on glossy paper.
I would learn more about Charlton Athletic by buying the fecking Metro which is free anyway.
IMHO
So now they are good people but a few minutes ago they were "Dreary flunkies". At least be honest enough to own your own prejudices and insults for once.
It's as if no journalist ever used a leading question. It's a standard technique to start the conversation. But you just want to slag off the comms teams so you jump on this, again.
I think you might have to do a lot of trawling back if you think you can back that up.
However I won't flag you for calling me a liar because I never flag anybody.
Even dreary flunkies can be good people, it takes all sorts to make a world as you demonstrate on a daily basis.