Charlton staff wages paid late? (Ed. Unsubstantiated rumour)
Comments
-
-
It had a question mark originally. I was asking a question. I understand grammar. So I posed my question with a question mark. The body of the op asked if I was right, with a question mark..RedChaser said:
Not in the title originally it didn't but does now. Don't you start.iainment said:
It has a question mark.RedChaser said:
Agreed it needs a question mark.Covered End said:
The title says it's a fact !Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
Ffs.
4 -
I heard the Supporters Trust are making secret deals with Duchatelet.Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
I don't know if it is true though.
Anyone else heard this?
See how easy it is to spread disinformation.
For the record I have no evidence to say that CAST are meeting with Duchatelet and no reason whatsoever to believe this.1 -
Chillax the title implied it was fact and that's why admin have amended it for you!iainment said:
It had a question mark originally. I was asking a question. I understand grammar. So I posed my question with a question mark. The body of the op asked if I was right, with a question mark..RedChaser said:
Not in the title originally it didn't but does now. Don't you start.iainment said:
It has a question mark.RedChaser said:
Agreed it needs a question mark.Covered End said:
The title says it's a fact !Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
Ffs.0 -
Someone's bored ........1
-
I bet they have lanyards too. Everybody loves a good lanyard.Dazzler21 said:1 -
What's the separate issue?Henry Irving said:Just this moment been told not true, wages have been paid and on time.
There is another, separate issue but the thread title is wrong.0 -
☝️shirty5 said:If it was true, then we would heard it a long time ago before now.
0 -
Theyve all been sacked, so I heard.The Red Robin said:
What's the separate issue?Henry Irving said:Just this moment been told not true, wages have been paid and on time.
There is another, separate issue but the thread title is wrong.0 -
If you had read/understood your thread title as I said, you would have realised that the title stated it as a fact !iainment said:
Do you understand what "?" Means?Covered End said:
Who told you ?iainment said:Fortnight late I hear.
But as soon as I said I'd post on here my source kinda ran away.
Is this right?
A bloke down the pub ?
If you're going to leave the post/thread, at least correct the title, which says it's a fact.
I asked a question. I didn't say it was a fact.
There was no question mark !!!!!!!3 -
Sponsored links:
-
It does now, because it has been amended by admin.iainment said:
It has a question mark.RedChaser said:
Agreed it needs a question mark.Covered End said:
The title says it's a fact !Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
Ffs.0 -
What's a question mark0
-
Not for me to share, sorry.The Red Robin said:
What's the separate issue?Henry Irving said:Just this moment been told not true, wages have been paid and on time.
There is another, separate issue but the thread title is wrong.4 -
If you're told anything else inflammatory and you don't know if there's a shred of truth in it, you should make the title clear and at least add a question mark, rather than stating it as a fact.iainment said:3 -
8
-
No. I put a question mark. I was asking a question so there was a question mark. Don't rewrite history.Covered End said:
It does now, because it has been amended by admin.iainment said:
It has a question mark.RedChaser said:
Agreed it needs a question mark.Covered End said:
The title says it's a fact !Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
Ffs.0 -
Spill the beans!Henry Irving said:Just this moment been told not true, wages have been paid and on time.
There is another, separate issue but the thread title is wrong.0 -
THERE WAS NO QUESTION MARK IN THE THREAD TITLE !!!!!!!iainment said:
No. I put a question mark. I was asking a question so there was a question mark. Don't rewrite history.Covered End said:
It does now, because it has been amended by admin.iainment said:
It has a question mark.RedChaser said:
Agreed it needs a question mark.Covered End said:
The title says it's a fact !Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
Ffs.1 -
So I now know if someone tells me something about Charlton not to ask any questions on here.
0 -
There was.Covered End said:
THERE WAS NO QUESTION MARK IN THE THREAD TITLE !!!!!!!iainment said:
No. I put a question mark. I was asking a question so there was a question mark. Don't rewrite history.Covered End said:
It does now, because it has been amended by admin.iainment said:
It has a question mark.RedChaser said:
Agreed it needs a question mark.Covered End said:
The title says it's a fact !Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
Ffs.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
If you're all done pulling each others' pigtails it's Friday night and there's football on. Chill.4
-
Exactlyse9addick said:
Because Charlton’s “staff” are not wealthy professional footballers, they are normal people (mainly!) with real lives and very real mortgages to pay.Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
Speculating on their financial well being without any actual evidence is in very poor taste.0 -
iainment said:
Let's ask Stuwall. He will know.Covered End said:
THERE WAS NO QUESTION MARK IN THE THREAD TITLE !!!!!!!iainment said:
No. I put a question mark. I was asking a question so there was a question mark. Don't rewrite history.Covered End said:
It does now, because it has been amended by admin.iainment said:
It has a question mark.RedChaser said:
Agreed it needs a question mark.Covered End said:
The title says it's a fact !Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
Ffs.1 -
Funny how only now people are worried about unsubstantiated rumours. Nobody cared about the few hundred of them on the other thread.7
-
Any serious issue can be dealt with by the Chief Executive.
5 -
Unberfuckingbelievable ?iainment said:
There was.Covered End said:
THERE WAS NO QUESTION MARK IN THE THREAD TITLE !!!!!!!iainment said:
No. I put a question mark. I was asking a question so there was a question mark. Don't rewrite history.Covered End said:
It does now, because it has been amended by admin.iainment said:
It has a question mark.RedChaser said:
Agreed it needs a question mark.Covered End said:
The title says it's a fact !Weegie Addick said:The OP is not saying it is fact but asking if anyone else has heard anything. Don't see what is wrong with that?
Ffs.1 -
Charlton life at its very best, arguing over a fucking question mark.30
-
?2
-
I remember the great comma wars of 2009 and the battle of the semi colon of late 2015 on here. They were supposed to be the conflicts that put an end to all punctuation- based warfare.DaveMehmet said:Charlton life at its very best, arguing over a fucking question mark.
Sadly doesn't appear that we have learned from history and put a full stop to all of this ;-(
This is the lowest point of the post - Curbs era for me. Once grammar goes out of the window we're barely human any more.21 -
One involving (mostly) wealthy footballers is one thing but one involving normal people who happen to work for our club and may be friends of people on here - that’s entirely differentcafc_harry said:Funny how only now people are worried about unsubstantiated rumours. Nobody cared about the few hundred of them on the other thread.
2
