Billy Clarke

cafcfan1990

Henry Irving said:

Needs must

Excellent player with a brain who I'll be sad to see go.

But Bowyer has been given a budget. Maxwell and Williams replace Steer and Ward so to free up funds Ajose (no loss) and maybe Clarke go.

If that is reinvested in another striker then that is the juggling trick that Bowyer has to make a call on.

So far he's got it right, long may it continue.

Henry Irving said:

Needs must

Excellent player with a brain who I'll be sad to see go.

But Bowyer has been given a budget. Maxwell and Williams replace Steer and Ward so to free up funds Ajose (no loss) and maybe Clarke go.

If that is reinvested in another striker then that is the juggling trick that Bowyer has to make a call on.

So far he's got it right, long may it continue.

This, we should trust Bowyer. We are looking at 2 players per position and a squad of 22. We have a midfielder we can let go to bring in a striker given it’s clearly 1 in 1 out

SantaClaus

paulie8290 said:

Back to Bradford maybe

I doubt it. My Bradford mate reckons they were pretty happy that he left.

killerandflash

Henry Irving said:

Needs must

Excellent player with a brain who I'll be sad to see go.

But Bowyer has been given a budget. Maxwell and Williams replace Steer and Ward so to free up funds Ajose (no loss) and maybe Clarke go.

If that is reinvested in another striker then that is the juggling trick that Bowyer has to make a call on.

So far he's got it right, long may it continue.

I'm not even sure that finances are the only driver, as I suspect Bowyer doesn't "fancy" him for the way he wants us to play. Despite our injury issues over the last few weeks, he's made no league appearances.

roseandcrown

I trust bowyers judgement on this and if moving him on frees so budget for a forward then so be it

Was brilliant for us in Robinson’s system and we did miss him once injured when Robinson carried on with the system

Oldham away he was brilliant

Exiled_Addick

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

killerandflash

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

Hardly. No club would expect to have THREE players for every position. And we could still play Fosu in the position anyway.

Exiled_Addick

killerandflash said:

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

Hardly. No club would expect to have THREE players for every position. And we could still play Fosu in the position anyway.

3 injury prone players.

superclive

I just don't think he fits bowyers system and perhaps he hadn't got back to where he was after such a bad injury. with our budget restrictions, if bowyer can shift him out and get another body in it's good business. if we had the finance to keep him and wait for him to get fit then that would be great, but we're a league 1 club now and can't.

Scoham

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

We've added Purrington, so if Clarke goes and a striker comes in it's still four in (Maxwell, Purrington, Williams, striker) and four out (Steer, Clarke, Ward, Ajose).

That would be a better balanced squad. We've got to hope our key players don't get injured, but that's the same for every club in our league. We've got a decent number of options in midfield with a few youngsters that are good enough to fill in when needed.

Scoham

Exiled_Addick said:

killerandflash said:

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

Hardly. No club would expect to have THREE players for every position. And we could still play Fosu in the position anyway.

3 injury prone players.

Isn't that often the choice in this league? Someone with more quality such as Williams is available because of his injury record. I'd rather take a chance on him than go with fit but mediocre players like Crofts and Foley as Slade did.

I wouldn't call Fosu injury prone either, most players will pick up injuries at some point over a season. A player isn't injury prone just because they didn't stay fit all season.

Exiled_Addick

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

killerandflash said:

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

Hardly. No club would expect to have THREE players for every position. And we could still play Fosu in the position anyway.

3 injury prone players.

Isn't that often the choice in this league? Someone with more quality such as Williams is available because of his injury record. I'd rather take a chance on him than go with fit but mediocre players like Crofts and Foley as Slade did.

I wouldn't call Fosu injury prone either, most players will pick up injuries at some point over a season. A player isn't injury prone just because they didn't stay fit all season.

I don’t disagree. Williams over Croft’s any day of the week, but the three players I’m referring to are Reeves, Clarke and Williams.

It’s entirely conceivable for 2 of those 3 to be out at anytime. A genuinely properly funded squad going for promotion would be able to keep those three AND have more than two senior strikers.

That isn’t our reality right know, and as I said above getting a striker is more important than keeping Clarke but we should be able to do both half way through a season which has potential to end well.

SouthWest_Addicks

If someone has to leave it makes sense that it should be Billy Clarke. Attacking midfield is a position we are strong with Williams, Reeves, Fosu and even Aribo who can operate in that position.

Both Lapslie and Morgan deserve opportunities to be involved in the squad until the rest of the season, and if Bowyer believes that Clarke isn’t good enough to be 1st or 2nd choice then he should let him leave.

Only real concern is that we will have let Clarke and Ajose leave and replacing them with a loan player who will depart at the end of the season. Would prefer a permanent transfer, but very unlikely.

EastTerrace

I really like Clarke and don’t want him to go.

Fair enough if you have someone better signed up but given that Williams has a bad injury record, Reeves being similar, Fosu inconsistent and Aribo still may move in the window last minute, I’d say we need to keep everyone until the end of the season if we are serious about promotion.

Scoham

Exiled_Addick said:

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

killerandflash said:

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

Hardly. No club would expect to have THREE players for every position. And we could still play Fosu in the position anyway.

3 injury prone players.

Isn't that often the choice in this league? Someone with more quality such as Williams is available because of his injury record. I'd rather take a chance on him than go with fit but mediocre players like Crofts and Foley as Slade did.

I wouldn't call Fosu injury prone either, most players will pick up injuries at some point over a season. A player isn't injury prone just because they didn't stay fit all season.

I don’t disagree. Williams over Croft’s any day of the week, but the three players I’m referring to are Reeves, Clarke and Williams.

It’s entirely conceivable for 2 of those 3 to be out at anytime. A genuinely properly funded squad going for promotion would be able to keep those three AND have more than two senior strikers.

That isn’t our reality right know, and as I said above getting a striker is more important than keeping Clarke but we should be able to do both half way through a season which has potential to end well.

I know some like to exclude Igor because he spends most of his time out injured, but we’re paying his wages and he’s part of the squad. Given he signed in 2014 for a big fee he’s going to be one of our highest earners. Add a loan striker that gives us four senior strikers.

I agree we should do more but it’s not going to happen while Roland’s here. We’re not far off two players per position. With those 3 out and everyone else fit we could still have a strong midfield of:

Bielik
Cullen Aribo
Fosu

With two of Pratley, Marshall, Morgan or Lapslie on the bench, and further cover from Dijksteel and Maloney.

Add in Williams and Reeves you could argue that’s enough midfielders even for a properly funded squad.

When Roland does sell I don’t think we’ll see squads that much bigger than this, maybe 1 or 2 extra players, neither will we have squads without injury prone players.

Exiled_Addick

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

killerandflash said:

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

Hardly. No club would expect to have THREE players for every position. And we could still play Fosu in the position anyway.

3 injury prone players.

Isn't that often the choice in this league? Someone with more quality such as Williams is available because of his injury record. I'd rather take a chance on him than go with fit but mediocre players like Crofts and Foley as Slade did.

I wouldn't call Fosu injury prone either, most players will pick up injuries at some point over a season. A player isn't injury prone just because they didn't stay fit all season.

I don’t disagree. Williams over Croft’s any day of the week, but the three players I’m referring to are Reeves, Clarke and Williams.

It’s entirely conceivable for 2 of those 3 to be out at anytime. A genuinely properly funded squad going for promotion would be able to keep those three AND have more than two senior strikers.

That isn’t our reality right know, and as I said above getting a striker is more important than keeping Clarke but we should be able to do both half way through a season which has potential to end well.

I know some like to exclude Igor because he spends most of his time out injured, but we’re paying his wages and he’s part of the squad. Given he signed in 2014 for a big fee he’s going to be one of our highest earners. Add a loan striker that gives us four senior strikers.

I agree we should do more but it’s not going to happen while Roland’s here. We’re not far off two players per position. With those 3 out and everyone else fit we could still have a strong midfield of:

Bielik
Cullen Aribo
Fosu

With two of Pratley, Marshall, Morgan or Lapslie on the bench, and further cover from Dijksteel and Maloney.

Add in Williams and Reeves you could argue that’s enough midfielders even for a properly funded squad.

When Roland does sell I don’t think we’ll see squads that much bigger than this, maybe 1 or 2 extra players, neither will we have squads without injury prone players.

Which was exactly my point.

Oggy Red

killerandflash said:

Henry Irving said:

Needs must

Excellent player with a brain who I'll be sad to see go.

But Bowyer has been given a budget. Maxwell and Williams replace Steer and Ward so to free up funds Ajose (no loss) and maybe Clarke go.

If that is reinvested in another striker then that is the juggling trick that Bowyer has to make a call on.

So far he's got it right, long may it continue.

Despite our injury issues over the last few weeks, he's made no league appearances.

Although Clarke himself was out with a thigh injury for a much of that period.

cafcfan1990

Exiled_Addick said:

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

killerandflash said:

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

Hardly. No club would expect to have THREE players for every position. And we could still play Fosu in the position anyway.

3 injury prone players.

Isn't that often the choice in this league? Someone with more quality such as Williams is available because of his injury record. I'd rather take a chance on him than go with fit but mediocre players like Crofts and Foley as Slade did.

I wouldn't call Fosu injury prone either, most players will pick up injuries at some point over a season. A player isn't injury prone just because they didn't stay fit all season.

I don’t disagree. Williams over Croft’s any day of the week, but the three players I’m referring to are Reeves, Clarke and Williams.

It’s entirely conceivable for 2 of those 3 to be out at anytime. A genuinely properly funded squad going for promotion would be able to keep those three AND have more than two senior strikers.

That isn’t our reality right know, and as I said above getting a striker is more important than keeping Clarke but we should be able to do both half way through a season which has potential to end well.

I know some like to exclude Igor because he spends most of his time out injured, but we’re paying his wages and he’s part of the squad. Given he signed in 2014 for a big fee he’s going to be one of our highest earners. Add a loan striker that gives us four senior strikers.

I agree we should do more but it’s not going to happen while Roland’s here. We’re not far off two players per position. With those 3 out and everyone else fit we could still have a strong midfield of:

Bielik
Cullen Aribo
Fosu

With two of Pratley, Marshall, Morgan or Lapslie on the bench, and further cover from Dijksteel and Maloney.

Add in Williams and Reeves you could argue that’s enough midfielders even for a properly funded squad.

When Roland does sell I don’t think we’ll see squads that much bigger than this, maybe 1 or 2 extra players, neither will we have squads without injury prone players.

Which was exactly my point.

I agree that 4 in 3 out was probably what we needed. We will probably be one short on paper but midfield still has by far the strongest numbers

LargeAddick

EastTerrace said:

I really like Clarke and don’t want him to go.

Fair enough if you have someone better signed up but given that Williams has a bad injury record, Reeves being similar, Fosu inconsistent and Aribo still may move in the window last minute, I’d say we need to keep everyone until the end of the season if we are serious about promotion.

If you are talking injury records you need look no further than Clarke, his Charlton career has barely got started.

Scoham

Exiled_Addick said:

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

killerandflash said:

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

Hardly. No club would expect to have THREE players for every position. And we could still play Fosu in the position anyway.

3 injury prone players.

Isn't that often the choice in this league? Someone with more quality such as Williams is available because of his injury record. I'd rather take a chance on him than go with fit but mediocre players like Crofts and Foley as Slade did.

I wouldn't call Fosu injury prone either, most players will pick up injuries at some point over a season. A player isn't injury prone just because they didn't stay fit all season.

I don’t disagree. Williams over Croft’s any day of the week, but the three players I’m referring to are Reeves, Clarke and Williams.

It’s entirely conceivable for 2 of those 3 to be out at anytime. A genuinely properly funded squad going for promotion would be able to keep those three AND have more than two senior strikers.

That isn’t our reality right know, and as I said above getting a striker is more important than keeping Clarke but we should be able to do both half way through a season which has potential to end well.

I know some like to exclude Igor because he spends most of his time out injured, but we’re paying his wages and he’s part of the squad. Given he signed in 2014 for a big fee he’s going to be one of our highest earners. Add a loan striker that gives us four senior strikers.

I agree we should do more but it’s not going to happen while Roland’s here. We’re not far off two players per position. With those 3 out and everyone else fit we could still have a strong midfield of:

Bielik
Cullen Aribo
Fosu

With two of Pratley, Marshall, Morgan or Lapslie on the bench, and further cover from Dijksteel and Maloney.

Add in Williams and Reeves you could argue that’s enough midfielders even for a properly funded squad.

When Roland does sell I don’t think we’ll see squads that much bigger than this, maybe 1 or 2 extra players, neither will we have squads without injury prone players.

Which was exactly my point.

Fair enough, but if you could add one or two players would you want more midfielders? I’d rather add two strikers, or a striker and attacking right back.

killerandflash

Oggy Red said:

killerandflash said:

Henry Irving said:

Needs must

Excellent player with a brain who I'll be sad to see go.

But Bowyer has been given a budget. Maxwell and Williams replace Steer and Ward so to free up funds Ajose (no loss) and maybe Clarke go.

If that is reinvested in another striker then that is the juggling trick that Bowyer has to make a call on.

So far he's got it right, long may it continue.

Despite our injury issues over the last few weeks, he's made no league appearances.

Although Clarke himself was out with a thigh injury for a much of that period.

Been on the bench for the last 3 matches though, but never used

Oggy Red

killerandflash said:

Oggy Red said:

killerandflash said:

Henry Irving said:

Needs must

Excellent player with a brain who I'll be sad to see go.

But Bowyer has been given a budget. Maxwell and Williams replace Steer and Ward so to free up funds Ajose (no loss) and maybe Clarke go.

If that is reinvested in another striker then that is the juggling trick that Bowyer has to make a call on.

So far he's got it right, long may it continue.

Despite our injury issues over the last few weeks, he's made no league appearances.

Although Clarke himself was out with a thigh injury for a much of that period.

Been on the bench for the last 3 matches though, but never used

Sure, but Williams has since signed; and young Albie Morgan was given a chance, played very well and deserved to keep his place.

But we were desperate for bodies for the Coventry and Barnsley matches - he may well have got playing time from the bench, but was himself missing with injury.

harveys_gardener

We have played Fosu as 10 most season and it is clearly not his game, he's a winger. Williams excellent there but if he gets injured? Prefer Clarke and shift Reeves.

Alwaysneil

Totally agree with this.

golfaddick

Richard J said:

Not surprised.

He never moved his family home from Yorkshire and is sharing a flat with Wimbledon's Liam Trotter. I suspect he would attract someone like Bury, Oldham or Rochdale and get a contract for next season.

Good luck Billy

Not read all the posts but this tells me a lot about the modern day footballer. 2 year deal & lives away from his family......heart not really in it & as soon as the 2 years are up they are off to find another club (don't care where) and get the signing on fee.

Well Mr Billy (big bollox) Clarke, how has it worked out for you this time ?? Played around 20 games & whilst injured we paid you & then got you fit again.

Thanks & on the way out take Mr (injury prone mk2) Reeves with you.

Bangkokaddick

I don't see how we will miss a player that's hardly played in the past year. And I just don't think he's in Bowyer's plans.

Exiled_Addick

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

Scoham said:

Exiled_Addick said:

killerandflash said:

Exiled_Addick said:

When Reeves and Williams both get injured in the first game in February this won’t look such a smart move, but that’s the reality of life under Poundland - always one player short.

I’ll admit, I’m one of the few who wasn’t totally taken in by his performances last season but that’s not to say he looked a poor player and the system we play would appear to suit him.

Getting a striker in is a higher priority though, so if someone must make way he’ll probably be the easiest to shift as we can presumably just let another club take on the remainder of his contract. Two players out to get one in is not ideal though.

Hardly. No club would expect to have THREE players for every position. And we could still play Fosu in the position anyway.

3 injury prone players.

Isn't that often the choice in this league? Someone with more quality such as Williams is available because of his injury record. I'd rather take a chance on him than go with fit but mediocre players like Crofts and Foley as Slade did.

I wouldn't call Fosu injury prone either, most players will pick up injuries at some point over a season. A player isn't injury prone just because they didn't stay fit all season.

I don’t disagree. Williams over Croft’s any day of the week, but the three players I’m referring to are Reeves, Clarke and Williams.

It’s entirely conceivable for 2 of those 3 to be out at anytime. A genuinely properly funded squad going for promotion would be able to keep those three AND have more than two senior strikers.

That isn’t our reality right know, and as I said above getting a striker is more important than keeping Clarke but we should be able to do both half way through a season which has potential to end well.

I know some like to exclude Igor because he spends most of his time out injured, but we’re paying his wages and he’s part of the squad. Given he signed in 2014 for a big fee he’s going to be one of our highest earners. Add a loan striker that gives us four senior strikers.

I agree we should do more but it’s not going to happen while Roland’s here. We’re not far off two players per position. With those 3 out and everyone else fit we could still have a strong midfield of:

Bielik
Cullen Aribo
Fosu

With two of Pratley, Marshall, Morgan or Lapslie on the bench, and further cover from Dijksteel and Maloney.

Add in Williams and Reeves you could argue that’s enough midfielders even for a properly funded squad.

When Roland does sell I don’t think we’ll see squads that much bigger than this, maybe 1 or 2 extra players, neither will we have squads without injury prone players.

Which was exactly my point.

Fair enough, but if you could add one or two players would you want more midfielders? I’d rather add two strikers, or a striker and attacking right back.

I’m not talking about adding more midfielders, I’m talking about keeping the ones we already have.

We have half a season to go, a potentially pivotal half a season for the future of the club, and perhaps for Roland’s ability to sell the club and get a better asking price.

If this was the start of the season it’s be a different conversation but what’s Clarke on? Even if it’s £4k a week, which it may well be less than, we’re talking 4 months of a contract to see out, £16k a month, meaning a £64k investment in the budget now to keep him and bring in a striker as well. We’ll be losing him for free now or in the summer so there’s no lost transfer fee to factor, just a little more in wages.

That very modest investment could make doubly sure we have enough midfielders to cover injuries/loss of form and see out the season, keep us firmly on the promotion hunt, and provide some bodies for the potential extension to the season the play-offs might create.

I know that's not how Roland operates, but it should be.

raytreacy69

golfaddick said:

Richard J said:

Not surprised.

He never moved his family home from Yorkshire and is sharing a flat with Wimbledon's Liam Trotter. I suspect he would attract someone like Bury, Oldham or Rochdale and get a contract for next season.

Good luck Billy

Not read all the posts but this tells me a lot about the modern day footballer. 2 year deal & lives away from his family......heart not really in it & as soon as the 2 years are up they are off to find another club (don't care where) and get the signing on fee.

Well Mr Billy (big bollox) Clarke, how has it worked out for you this time ?? Played around 20 games & whilst injured we paid you & then got you fit again.

Thanks & on the way out take Mr (injury prone mk2) Reeves with you.

I think that is very harsh on a player that has just come back from a career threatening injury.He was a very valued member of our squad prior to that injury.Unfortunately for him it looks like he may never get back to being the same
Player again.We have a decent squad that includes Reeves who on his day is one of the best players in this league.Lets hope Reeves stays fit for the remainder of the season and I wish Billy Clarke all the best for he future

Alwaysneil

I agree before his injury Billy Clarke looked really good. An ACL is a shitty injury because you can’t do anything about it and then it’s a year of hard work to get back to where you were before if you ever quite get there.

If he were playing I’m sure he would but difficult off the bench.

YTS1978

How many teams are going to take a risk on a fella back from an acl injury, at the business end of the season? He's not played for us as we cant afford to ease him back in and we have other options. Id be surprised if another team takes a punt and sticks him straight in the starting line up. Id like to keep him and see if theres still a bit of magic he can produce off the bench later in the season.

He also seems like a good lad to have around the place

ForeverAddickted

YTS1978 said:

How many teams are going to take a risk on a fella back from an acl injury, at the business end of the season? He's not played for us as we cant afford to ease him back in and we have other options. Id be surprised if another team takes a punt and sticks him straight in the starting line up. Id like to keep him and see if theres still a bit of magic he can produce off the bench later in the season.

He also seems like a good lad to have around the place

Dunno... Bet there are a few at the bottom of the League who might be eager

Liam Trotter is still at AFC Wimbledon so am sure he'll be recommending Billy Clarke to them if they could get him