Referee: idk he didn't have to do any refereeing. Denied Wimbledon a couple of blatant corners though so 8 for amusement value Steer: 7.5 contrary to Paulie I think his distribution could be very, very useful for us, and good on crosses Dijksteel: 6.5 a bit scatterbrained Yao: 6 not ready but grew into it Sarr: 8 the master. His occasional misplaced pass simply adds to the mystique Marshall: 7 alternated between penetrating and maddening but at least he got the ball in a few times Reeves: 6.5 a good shift, match fitness and all that, showed a lovely touch Lapslie: 7 ran things nicely Morgan: 6 didn't see so much of it Maloney: 6.5 for everything good he did there was a duff touch, but set things off a few times Vetokele: 6 a matter of match fitness, some nice moves in there Hackett-Fairchild: 4.5 not remotely ready, little went right Mascoll: 8 added so much threat to our left flank and an awesome goal to boot
ref 6 Steer: 6 ok Dijksteel: 6 why can't he play in midfield? Yao: 6.5 was ok looked to go forward Sarr: 6.5 captains performance Marshall: 7 was our only attacking threat Reeves: 5.5 Wing back, what was that about? Lapslie: 7 dictated our play Morgan: 6 good on ball but didn't see enough Maloney: 6 ok Vetokele: 6 slightly disappointing Hackett-Fairchild: 5.5 poor Mascoll: 6.5 good strike but not ready for first eleven yet.
Referee: 6 better than most league 1 refs despite the corners that weren't
Steer: 6.5 questionable close distribution, commanded area well (vocal) but hardly tested Dijksteel: 6 steady Yao: 6.5 shaky start but grew into it Sarr: 8 Marshall: 7 as usual, good approach work but little end product Reeves: 6.5 good game-time Lapslie: 8.5 M O M Morgan: 6.5 Maloney: 7 Vetokele: 6.5 Hackett-Fairchild: 4 can be a good option but rarely involved Mascoll: 8 extra point for the goal
Referee: idk he didn't have to do any refereeing. Denied Wimbledon a couple of blatant corners though so 8 for amusement value Steer: 7.5 contrary to Paulie I think his distribution could be very, very useful for us, and good on crosses Dijksteel: 6.5 a bit scatterbrained Yao: 6 not ready but grew into it Sarr: 8 the master. His occasional misplaced pass simply adds to the mystique Marshall: 7 alternated between penetrating and maddening but at least he got the ball in a few times Reeves: 6.5 a good shift, match fitness and all that, showed a lovely touch Lapslie: 7 ran things nicely Morgan: 6 didn't see so much of it Maloney: 6.5 for everything good he did there was a duff touch, but set things off a few times Vetokele: 6 a matter of match fitness, some nice moves in there Hackett-Fairchild: 4.5 not remotely ready, little went right Mascoll: 8 added so much threat to our left flank and an awesome goal to boot
@Leuth Sarr the master haha! That’s the best comment on a player rating thread for a long time!
Wasnt gonna do these but after seeing some of the ratings and comments for Mascoll I had to.
Steer: 7- some good saves but distribution same as phillips, always plays it quick and only goes to a cafc player 50% of the time Dijksteel:-6 Yao:6- picked up in 2nd half but not ready for 1st team Sarr:-7- very commanding good goal Marshall:7-best I have seen him play this season Reeves:-5- very noticable it was his 1st game Lapslie:8 MOM- great performance Morgan:7- strong game from him Maloney:6- forgot he was on the pitch Vetokele:6 Hackett-Fairchild:5- Mascoll:8- great performance from him, looked good on the ball, put some great crosses in and a good goal, would like to see him on the bench Saturday
Wasnt gonna do these but after seeing some of the ratings and comments for Mascoll I had to.
Steer: 7- some good saves but distribution same as phillips, always plays it quick and only goes to a cafc player 50% of the time Dijksteel:-6 Yao:6- picked up in 2nd half but not ready for 1st team Sarr:-7- very commanding good goal Marshall:7-best I have seen him play this season Reeves:-5- very noticable it was his 1st game Lapslie:8 MOM- great performance Morgan:7- strong game from him Maloney:6- forgot he was on the pitch Vetokele:6 Hackett-Fairchild:5- Mascoll:8- great performance from him, looked good on the ball, put some great crosses in and a good goal, would like to see him on the bench Saturday
Why is that an excuse to do the marks now, surely you should always do them as the more people who do the more accurate it will be. LL makes the effort and so should we
Wasnt gonna do these but after seeing some of the ratings and comments for Mascoll I had to.
Steer: 7- some good saves but distribution same as phillips, always plays it quick and only goes to a cafc player 50% of the time Dijksteel:-6 Yao:6- picked up in 2nd half but not ready for 1st team Sarr:-7- very commanding good goal Marshall:7-best I have seen him play this season Reeves:-5- very noticable it was his 1st game Lapslie:8 MOM- great performance Morgan:7- strong game from him Maloney:6- forgot he was on the pitch Vetokele:6 Hackett-Fairchild:5- Mascoll:8- great performance from him, looked good on the ball, put some great crosses in and a good goal, would like to see him on the bench Saturday
Why is that an excuse to do the marks now, surely you should always do them as the more people who do the more accurate it will be. LL makes the effort and so should we
Everyone has an option for giving stats. Half the forum don't give stat feedback so no point digging him out mate. Let alone trying to play a guilt card saying everyone should make an effort because someone runs a stat bank for the fun of the forum.
Wasnt gonna do these but after seeing some of the ratings and comments for Mascoll I had to.
Steer: 7- some good saves but distribution same as phillips, always plays it quick and only goes to a cafc player 50% of the time Dijksteel:-6 Yao:6- picked up in 2nd half but not ready for 1st team Sarr:-7- very commanding good goal Marshall:7-best I have seen him play this season Reeves:-5- very noticable it was his 1st game Lapslie:8 MOM- great performance Morgan:7- strong game from him Maloney:6- forgot he was on the pitch Vetokele:6 Hackett-Fairchild:5- Mascoll:8- great performance from him, looked good on the ball, put some great crosses in and a good goal, would like to see him on the bench Saturday
Why is that an excuse to do the marks now, surely you should always do them as the more people who do the more accurate it will be. LL makes the effort and so should we
Everyone has an option for giving stats. Half the forum don't give stat feedback so no point digging him out mate. Let alone trying to play a guilt card saying everyone should make an effort because someone runs a stat bank for the fun of the forum.
Firstly it was half a joke, i will always give my marks/opinions personally as its a good indicator overall.
Comments
Steer: 7.5 contrary to Paulie I think his distribution could be very, very useful for us, and good on crosses
Dijksteel: 6.5 a bit scatterbrained
Yao: 6 not ready but grew into it
Sarr: 8 the master. His occasional misplaced pass simply adds to the mystique
Marshall: 7 alternated between penetrating and maddening but at least he got the ball in a few times
Reeves: 6.5 a good shift, match fitness and all that, showed a lovely touch
Lapslie: 7 ran things nicely
Morgan: 6 didn't see so much of it
Maloney: 6.5 for everything good he did there was a duff touch, but set things off a few times
Vetokele: 6 a matter of match fitness, some nice moves in there
Hackett-Fairchild: 4.5 not remotely ready, little went right
Mascoll: 8 added so much threat to our left flank and an awesome goal to boot
Referee: 5
Steer: 6,5
Dijksteel: 6,5
Yao: 7 - very good 2nd half
Sarr: 7,5 - rock solid for 80 mins
Marshall: 8 - biggest attacking threat, got tired
Reeves: 7
Lapslie: 8,5 - MOM
Morgan: 7
Maloney: 6
Vetokele: 7
Hackett-Fairchild: 6
Mascoll: 7,5
Ajose: n/a
Steer: 7
Dijksteel: 7
Yao: 6
Sarr: 7.5
Marshall: 7
Reeves: 7
Lapslie: 7
Morgan: 6.5
Maloney: 6.5
Vetokele: 6
Hackett-Fairchild: 5.5
Mascoll: 7
Ifollow
Steer: 7
Dijksteel: 6.5
Yao: 6.5
Sarr: 7.5
Marshall: 6
Reeves: 6
Lapslie: 7.5
Morgan: 7
Maloney: 7
Vetokele: 5
Hackett-Fairchild: 5
Mascoll: 7
Steer 7
Dijksteel 6
Yao 6
Sarr 8
Marshall 7
Reeves 6
Lapslie 7.5
Morgan 6
Maloney 6
Vetokele 6
Hackett-fairchild 5.5
Mascoll 6.5
Steer: 6 ok
Dijksteel: 6 why can't he play in midfield?
Yao: 6.5 was ok looked to go forward
Sarr: 6.5 captains performance
Marshall: 7 was our only attacking threat
Reeves: 5.5 Wing back, what was that about?
Lapslie: 7 dictated our play
Morgan: 6 good on ball but didn't see enough
Maloney: 6 ok
Vetokele: 6 slightly disappointing
Hackett-Fairchild: 5.5 poor
Mascoll: 6.5 good strike but not ready for first eleven yet.
Steer 7
Dijksteel 6
Yao 6
Sarr 8
Marshall 7
Reeves 6
Lapslie 7
Morgan 6
Maloney 6
Vetokele 6
Hackett-fairchild 5
Mascoll 6.0
Steer: 6.5 questionable close distribution, commanded area well (vocal) but hardly tested
Dijksteel: 6 steady
Yao: 6.5 shaky start but grew into it
Sarr: 8
Marshall: 7 as usual, good approach work but little end product
Reeves: 6.5 good game-time
Lapslie: 8.5 M O M
Morgan: 6.5
Maloney: 7
Vetokele: 6.5
Hackett-Fairchild: 4 can be a good option but rarely involved
Mascoll: 8 extra point for the goal
Ajose: n/a
Steer: 7- some good saves but distribution same as phillips, always plays it quick and only goes to a cafc player 50% of the time
Dijksteel:-6
Yao:6- picked up in 2nd half but not ready for 1st team
Sarr:-7- very commanding good goal
Marshall:7-best I have seen him play this season
Reeves:-5- very noticable it was his 1st game
Lapslie:8 MOM- great performance
Morgan:7- strong game from him
Maloney:6- forgot he was on the pitch
Vetokele:6
Hackett-Fairchild:5-
Mascoll:8- great performance from him, looked good on the ball, put some great crosses in and a good goal, would like to see him on the bench Saturday
Why is that an excuse to do the marks now, surely you should always do them as the more people who do the more accurate it will be. LL makes the effort and so should we
*shakes head