Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Banning CL users from the Valley?

hoof_it_up_to_benty
hoof_it_up_to_benty Posts: 22,443
in General Charlton
If a lot of the problems at Charlton are down to the negative views expressed on this website is it worth RD banning those who have expressed negative opinions?

Comments

  • EastStand
    EastStand Posts: 4,109
    I think most of us have banned ourselves at this point :joy:
  • eaststandmike
    eaststandmike Posts: 14,956
    He can ban me if he wants but until the old scrote has sold up and fecked off I will not be stepping foot inside The Valley.

    #notapennymore
  • addick05
    addick05 Posts: 2,348
    hoof_it_up_to_benty said:

    If a lot of the problems at Charlton are down to the negative views expressed on this website is it worth RD banning those who have expressed negative opinions?

    And just how would he go about identifying these disruptive rogues? I think you'll find we have a Data Protection Act in place.

  • Arsenetatters
    Arsenetatters Posts: 5,974
    addick05 said:

    hoof_it_up_to_benty said:

    If a lot of the problems at Charlton are down to the negative views expressed on this website is it worth RD banning those who have expressed negative opinions?

    And just how would he go about identifying these disruptive rogues? I think you'll find we have a Data Protection Act in place.

    I guess it's more obvious for some than others. I'll hide my arse.

    He's probably got an agent in Brasov looking for @Bigin
  • hoof_it_up_to_benty
    hoof_it_up_to_benty Posts: 22,443
    addick05 said:

    hoof_it_up_to_benty said:

    If a lot of the problems at Charlton are down to the negative views expressed on this website is it worth RD banning those who have expressed negative opinions?

    And just how would he go about identifying these disruptive rogues? I think you'll find we have a Data Protection Act in place.

    They should just fess up if they love Charlton.

    RD has said our failure is not down to him.
  • addick05
    addick05 Posts: 2,348
    hoof_it_up_to_benty said:

    addick05 said:

    hoof_it_up_to_benty said:

    If a lot of the problems at Charlton are down to the negative views expressed on this website is it worth RD banning those who have expressed negative opinions?

    And just how would he go about identifying these disruptive rogues? I think you'll find we have a Data Protection Act in place.

    They should just fess up if they love Charlton.

    RD has said our failure is not down to him.
    Could be interesting I suppose. Just imagine all those people in a court of law where their reasons for posting such diabolical accusations would be made public. More than a little embarrassing for the Belgian One I would think.

  • T_C_E
    T_C_E Posts: 16,418
    edited October 2018
    While on my visit to Toms lovely house in SE9, I was told if I signed the paper it would all go away and I would not be banned from the Valley. I did ask if I could appeal against the decision. ;)
  • N01R4M
    N01R4M Posts: 2,577
    Stupid twerp will hopefully send his minions to Pride Park Stadium to look for me.

Categories

“Marketplace”