Lino says it was so it was, Ref then produced a red.
I mean yeah it was given as so, but the Lino was on the wrong side of the challenge to be conclusive.
And where were you exactly ?
To be honest I didnt think it was a red card either... And I was next to the person you can see in the bottom right corner so was only the Lino closer to the incident than me
Hmmm, 63% plays 36% in favour of 'Yellow at most', wonder if there'll be cries for a second vote?
If it was a Wimbledon player the vote would be the other way round. You can talk about the sending off till the next fa cup match fact is the lino and ref give him the elbow. These refs now should be helped by technology. Dazzler21 has watched the tackle 321 times slowed it down as much as he could and told me sarr got the ball. These officials get one look at an incident at normal speed. No doubt in true CL tradition we will be discussing this till the cows come home.
Lino says it was so it was, Ref then produced a red.
I mean yeah it was given as so, but the Lino was on the wrong side of the challenge to be conclusive.
And where were you exactly ?
To be honest I didnt think it was a red card either... And I was next to the person you can see in the bottom right corner so was only the Lino closer to the incident than me
I take it all back. That photo proves it was only a yellow.
Lino says it was so it was, Ref then produced a red.
I mean yeah it was given as so, but the Lino was on the wrong side of the challenge to be conclusive.
And where were you exactly ?
To be honest I didnt think it was a red card either... And I was next to the person you can see in the bottom right corner so was only the Lino closer to the incident than me
I take it all back. That photo proves it was only a yellow.
The red card brigade are wavering, from a little trickle a raging torrent will often follow
I think the fact that so many on here have such contrasting views shows that we may need more clarification on the laws of the game or as a general population of football supporters, not too many actually understand the laws of the game. That applies to officials as well, too many make things up that just aren’t part of the game. We see it all the time.
So for that reason as well as the many stated from others on here and my previous comments. Just like a penalty, unless things are 100% certain, you can’t give it.
Lino says it was so it was, Ref then produced a red.
I mean yeah it was given as so, but the Lino was on the wrong side of the challenge to be conclusive.
And where were you exactly ?
To be honest I didnt think it was a red card either... And I was next to the person you can see in the bottom right corner so was only the Lino closer to the incident than me
I take it all back. That photo proves it was only a yellow.
The red card brigade are wavering, from a little trickle a raging torrent will often follow
Lino says it was so it was, Ref then produced a red.
I mean yeah it was given as so, but the Lino was on the wrong side of the challenge to be conclusive.
And where were you exactly ?
To be honest I didnt think it was a red card either... And I was next to the person you can see in the bottom right corner so was only the Lino closer to the incident than me
I take it all back. That photo proves it was only a yellow.
The red card brigade are wavering, from a little trickle a raging torrent will often follow
Lino says it was so it was, Ref then produced a red.
I mean yeah it was given as so, but the Lino was on the wrong side of the challenge to be conclusive.
And where were you exactly ?
To be honest I didnt think it was a red card either... And I was next to the person you can see in the bottom right corner so was only the Lino closer to the incident than me
I take it all back. That photo proves it was only a yellow.
The red card brigade are wavering, from a little trickle a raging torrent will often follow
I suspect he was being sarcastic.
So do I but as I keep suggesting the winky smiley thing is your friend
A no but what a prat. Can see why he got red cos he didn't get the ball and studs were showing. I would give him a yellow because I don't ever have a problem with a hard tackle old skool style. Then for this why when there was no need whatsoever. Classic sarr. Brain goes at least once in a match, just this time it happened after 30 seconds.
Charlton have decided not to appeal Naby Sarr’s red card in Saturday’s 2-0 win over Wimbledon.
The French defender was sent off inside the opening minute against the Dons. And he will now serve a three-match suspension.
“Chris Parkes [club secretary] seems to think that we wouldn’t be able to overturn it,” said Addicks manager Lee Bowyer.
“He has got more experience than me on this over the years.
“I thought it was harsh, I have seen it back now. There is nothing malicious in it, it’s just slightly mistimed. You’re talking about a split second. You could even argue he won the ball first.
It was one of those that a lot of refs would have given a yellow for, but one you can't really appeal. Mind you I was surprised Portsmouth won their appeal.
Charlton have decided not to appeal Naby Sarr’s red card in Saturday’s 2-0 win over Wimbledon.
The French defender was sent off inside the opening minute against the Dons. And he will now serve a three-match suspension.
“Chris Parkes [club secretary] seems to think that we wouldn’t be able to overturn it,” said Addicks manager Lee Bowyer.
“He has got more experience than me on this over the years.
“I thought it was harsh, I have seen it back now. There is nothing malicious in it, it’s just slightly mistimed. You’re talking about a split second. You could even argue he won the ball first.
Charlton have decided not to appeal Naby Sarr’s red card in Saturday’s 2-0 win over Wimbledon.
The French defender was sent off inside the opening minute against the Dons. And he will now serve a three-match suspension.
“Chris Parkes [club secretary] seems to think that we wouldn’t be able to overturn it,” said Addicks manager Lee Bowyer.
“He has got more experience than me on this over the years.
“I thought it was harsh, I have seen it back now. There is nothing malicious in it, it’s just slightly mistimed. You’re talking about a split second. You could even argue he won the ball first.
Sorry but that is bollocks letting Chris Parkes decide if you want to appeal.
We are already struggling with injuries and have now lost Sarr for 3 games, if he honestly doesnt think it was a red then appeal
Couldn’t agree more @paulie8290 Bowyer has played the game so for me that experience is more vital than what Chris Parkes seems to think. If Thompson’s can get overturned, so can Sarr’s.
Really poor from the club I think.
Anyone actually know how long he is suspended for?
Charlton have decided not to appeal Naby Sarr’s red card in Saturday’s 2-0 win over Wimbledon.
The French defender was sent off inside the opening minute against the Dons. And he will now serve a three-match suspension.
“Chris Parkes [club secretary] seems to think that we wouldn’t be able to overturn it,” said Addicks manager Lee Bowyer.
“He has got more experience than me on this over the years.
“I thought it was harsh, I have seen it back now. There is nothing malicious in it, it’s just slightly mistimed. You’re talking about a split second. You could even argue he won the ball first.
Sorry but that is bollocks letting Chris Parkes decide if you want to appeal.
We are already struggling with injuries and have now lost Sarr for 3 games, if he honestly doesnt think it was a red then appeal
Couldn’t agree more @paulie8290 Bowyer has played the game so for me that experience is more vital than what Chris Parkes seems to think. If Thompson’s can get overturned, so can Sarr’s.
Really poor from the club I think.
Anyone actually know how long he is suspended for?
Violent conduct is 3 games So Gills Coventry Barnsley
As reds can't be down turned to a yellow there's no point the club appealing. It would never get overturned completely so I make the club right not to appeal but it still wasn't a red card for me.
That said I've got no idea how the Pompey red got overturned then as that was a yellow card offence I thought too.
Charlton have decided not to appeal Naby Sarr’s red card in Saturday’s 2-0 win over Wimbledon.
The French defender was sent off inside the opening minute against the Dons. And he will now serve a three-match suspension.
“Chris Parkes [club secretary] seems to think that we wouldn’t be able to overturn it,” said Addicks manager Lee Bowyer.
“He has got more experience than me on this over the years.
“I thought it was harsh, I have seen it back now. There is nothing malicious in it, it’s just slightly mistimed. You’re talking about a split second. You could even argue he won the ball first.
Sorry but that is bollocks letting Chris Parkes decide if you want to appeal.
We are already struggling with injuries and have now lost Sarr for 3 games, if he honestly doesnt think it was a red then appeal
Couldn’t agree more @paulie8290 Bowyer has played the game so for me that experience is more vital than what Chris Parkes seems to think. If Thompson’s can get overturned, so can Sarr’s.
Really poor from the club I think.
Anyone actually know how long he is suspended for?
Violent conduct is 3 games So Gills Coventry Barnsley
Back for Walsall
It’s not violent conduct though, he hasn’t had a fight with someone. It’s serious foul play.
Which I’ve just found both serious foul play and violent conduct is 3 games. That’s very harsh on us and Naby.
You can't go in recklessly, smashing a player up in the air and risking breaking his ankle or leg and complain at getting a red card.
We'd be foolish to appeal and if we do I'm confident we will lose, which tells you all you need to know.
PS should we have another poll, asking opinions if that foul was on a Charlton player ?
Well the nearest thing to Sarr's challenge was the Pompey card in midweek, I felt a red card was harsh then too. Was Sarr's red any worse than the Pompey red in midweek?
Personally, I feel Sarr's was definitely worse and deserved a red card.
I thought Thompson of Portsmouth was a 50/50 challenge and not deserving of a red.
Like I say, let's see if we appeal and if we do let's see the result.
I reckon we have a 10% chance of appealing & winning.
Comments
If he didn't want to be tackled, he should take up dressage instead.
So for that reason as well as the many stated from others on here and my previous comments. Just like a penalty, unless things are 100% certain, you can’t give it.
It needs rescinding.
Red card on a dry day though
The French defender was sent off inside the opening minute against the Dons. And he will now serve a three-match suspension.
“Chris Parkes [club secretary] seems to think that we wouldn’t be able to overturn it,” said Addicks manager Lee Bowyer.
“He has got more experience than me on this over the years.
“I thought it was harsh, I have seen it back now. There is nothing malicious in it, it’s just slightly mistimed. You’re talking about a split second. You could even argue he won the ball first.
“He’s such a big fella that his momentum took him through the fella.”
https://www.londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-decide-on-whether-to-appeal-naby-sarrs-red-card/
We are already struggling with injuries and have now lost Sarr for 3 games, if he honestly doesnt think it was a red then appeal
Really poor from the club I think.
Anyone actually know how long he is suspended for?
So
Gills
Coventry
Barnsley
Back for Walsall
That said I've got no idea how the Pompey red got overturned then as that was a yellow card offence I thought too.
LB is being a bit disingenuous, by letting it seem that he would have appealed but Chris said no.
If Lee really felt there was a reasonable chance to get it overturned he would have appealed, end of.
Which I’ve just found both serious foul play and violent conduct is 3 games. That’s very harsh on us and Naby.
Also glad to see Bowyer agrees with me. Naby won the ball first.
It'd be interesting to see the facts of what his red was charged as.