Unattributed allegations in M"rd0ch's despicable rag = lies. That sordid publication enjoys nothing more than trashing people just because it can. If the entire staff could muster an atom of integrity between them, they'd publish and be damned. It ain't libel if it's true, so why wouldn't they? One might work for the rancid criminal enterprise if one absolutely needed the work and the wages to avoid penury but paying for the published ordure is worse, it condones every heinous offence perpetrated under that title. Scum all.
Unattributed allegations in M"rd0ch's despicable rag = lies. That sordid publication enjoys nothing more than trashing people just because it can. If the entire staff could muster an atom of integrity between them, they'd publish and be damned. It ain't libel if it's true, so why wouldn't they? One might work for the rancid criminal enterprise if one absolutely needed the work and the wages to avoid penury but paying for the published ordure is worse, it condones every heinous offence perpetrated under that title. Scum all.
Rumor has it that it was someone that not too long had a bit of a disagreement with someone at the Sun over an article. This is probably why the Sun are treading a bit carefully over naming him.
Comments