Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Lyle Taylor ban stands, Finley charged, their GK's ban is dropped
Comments
-
I think the fact that Lyle didn’t complain or argue the toss, and in fact apologised to all and sundry for his actions following the FA’s decision, kind of signifies his admission of some wrong doing.4
-
It's pretty clear watching the footage that he kicked out. I don't know why people complained about it.0
-
What Taylor did would now way leave marks on anyone. Can you imagine the keeper discovering rake marks (or any sort of marks) on his legs and not running to the ref.ForeverAddickted said:I think its worse because Taylor goes in with his studs... the way he pushes away is similar to how a player would go in two footed in a tackle and so get themselves sent off
There probably isnt much force in his action but Google the results of what marks a set of studs can leave on an opposing player
I'm with Bowyer, don't really get it.0 -
Pretty stupid to send that angle in as evidence against the decision in my opinion.
That angle footage should have been 'lost'3 -
0
-
We could hope that Fleetwood kicks off then gets abandoned, one left of Lyle's ban and he gets to play in the replay.3
-
Tomorrow??harveys_gardener said:We could hope that tomorrow kicks off then gets abandoned, one left of Lyle's ban and he gets to play in the replay.
1 -
Is today Wednesday?0
-
Another hg classic.harveys_gardener said:We could hope that Fleetwood kicks off then gets abandoned, one left of Lyle's ban and he gets to play in the replay.
If the game's abandoned then it surely can't count as a game played.4 -
It was a bit like the Beckham kick out in terms of force. Silly because it doesn't hurt so only achieves a negative for you. Might be a lesson learned for him.0
- Sponsored links:
-
looking at taylors cards this season 9 yellows and red is a lot for 29 games played i think0
-
Apparently Davinson Sanchez wont be charged for the very clear stamp he did on Laurent Koscielny. Looked far worse than what Taylor did but because the officials saw it no further action will be taken. The laws of the game are truly ridiculous.3
-
AllHailTheHen said:Apparently Davinson Sanchez wont be charged for the very clear stamp he did on Laurent Koscielny. Looked far worse than what Taylor did but because the officials saw it no further action will be taken. The laws of the game are truly ridiculous.0
-
That is a crazy rule. Mark Halsey was complaining how he had a bad angle on a tackle once where the player tried to take someone's leg off but didn't even get a booking. He told the FA and they said they weren't going to do anything because he had technically 'seen it'.
He said clearly he hadn't seen it properly because now that player was getting away scott free with violent play.
Madness.0 -
Chunes said:That is a crazy rule. Mark Halsey was complaining how he had a bad angle on a tackle once where the player tried to take someone's leg off but didn't even get a booking. He told the FA and they said they weren't going to do anything because he had technically 'seen it'.
He said clearly he hadn't seen it properly because now that player was getting away scott free with violent play.
Madness.
If the referee thinks something naughty may have happened but hasn't had a good enough view of the incident to be absolutely certain, especially if it's a possible red card offence, he should be able to flag the incident for a later review.
It may not be necessary in top flight matches next year because of the introduction of VAR but it could play a bigger part in Divisions two, Three, and Four.0 -
Good idea, what did the ref send the Accrington goalie off for? Red card rescinded on the Monday so what did the ref actually see or thought he saw?0
-
palarsehater said:
Rugby is so far ahead of football in terms of 1) respect to the officials and 2) retrospective actions. Those 2 points are indisputable facts.
But the backwards in terms of sliding around dressing rooms naked and drinking each other’s body fluids?0 -
Dazzler21 said:palarsehater said:
Rugby is so far ahead of football in terms of 1) respect to the officials and 2) retrospective actions. Those 2 points are indisputable facts.
But the backwards in terms of sliding around dressing rooms naked and drinking each other’s body fluids?3 -
So Sam Finley, who received a five match ban for that stamp on Taylor is in more trouble, This time he's received an eight game ban for using abusive language.
Couldn't have happened to a nicer player!1 -
Addick Addict said:So Sam Finley, who received a five match ban for that stamp on Taylor is in more trouble, This time he's received an eight game ban for using abusive language.
Couldn't have happened to a nicer player!4 - Sponsored links:
-
Whilst abuse is undesirable obviously I find it strange that a kick to the head is deemed less serious than being rude and offensive.
5 -
LenGlover said:Whilst abuse is undesirable obviously I find it strange that a kick to the head is deemed less serious than being rude and offensive.1
-
Guy is a prick. Every time I saw him in other games plus a few others.. they were a nasty piece of work.0
-
Sam Finley always seemed like a nice lad too...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cm2ekkpkjgxo0 -
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cm2ekkpkjgxo
Tranmere's Finley gets 13-game ban for homophobic slur
1 -
Callumcafc said:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cm2ekkpkjgxo
Tranmere's Finley gets 13-game ban for homophobic slur
Always been a wrong’un1 -
Callumcafc said:Callumcafc said:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cm2ekkpkjgxo
Tranmere's Finley gets 13-game ban for homophobic slur
Always been a wrong’un7