Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Charlton v Southend

2

Comments

  • Phillips: 6
    Solly: 6
    Bielik: 6.5
    Sarr: 7
    Purrington: 6
    Cullen: 6.5
    Reeves: 7
    Williams:6.5
    Fosu:6
    Marshall: 6
    Vetokele: 6
    Parker: 6
    Referee: 7
  • edited February 2019
    Phillips: 6
    Solly: 6
    Bielik: 6
    Sarr: 7
    Purrington: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Reeves: 7
    Williams: 8
    Fosu: 6
    Marshall: 6
    Vetokele: 5
    Parker: 7
    Referee: 8
  • Phillips: 6
    Solly: 6
    Bielik: 6
    Sarr: 7
    Purrington: 6.5
    Cullen: 6.5
    Reeves: 6
    Williams:6.5
    Fosu:4
    Marshall: 5
    Vetokele: 6
    Parker: 6.5
    Referee: 6
  • Phillips: 6 nearly gave them a goal by not coming for a bouncing ball. Following on for his mistake at heading a ball to Ched Evans last week I would change next week.
    Solly: 6 Good on 1-1, but 1st touch on so many passes was embarrassingly poor. Never going past a player. I think Dyksteel is better.
    Bielik: 7.5 dealt with everything that came his way.
    Sarr: 9.5 would have been 10 if that shot had gone in! 
    Purrington: 6 Solid. Pleased with that.
    Cullen: 8 ran the show
    Reeves: 7 good goal. Pity he was taken off.
    Williams: 6.5
    Fosu: 4 beat his player so superbly in the first half, and then tried to do it again instead of passing. The sort of decision making that says you will never make it?
    Marshall: 4 If you get near the goal line, cut it back, not take a shot. If you can’t get that bit right, give up. We had two waiting for a tap in. Poor.
    Vetokele: 6 We need the midfield to be a bit braver with their passing. You have to see the run, and then play the ball. If you can’t deliver you have reached your level. Blame them more than Veto.
    Parker: 7 Quite impressed. Good runs, got to some great headers. Would be my choice to play with Taylor. Didn’t think I would be saying that.
    Referee: 9 got nearly everything right. Did think he was not robust enough at dealing with their time wasting.

    Oh, and Reco. Hit the bloody target!

  • Phillips: 6
    Solly: 6
    Bielik: 6 surprisingly poor defensively in his natural position
    Sarr: 8
    Purrington: 6.5
    Cullen: 6
    Reeves: 7
    Williams: 7
    Fosu: 4
    Marshall: 5.5 
    Vetokele: 5
    Parker: 6.5
    Referee: 6
  • Phillips: 6 not much to do
    Solly: 7 usual dependable self
    Bielik: 8 class
    Sarr: 8 some  great passing and touches
    Purrington: 6 steady  
    Cullen: 9 ran the midfield, not his fault the flair players didn’t perform
    Reeves: 7 great header 
    Williams:6 flatters to deceive 
    Fosu: 4 poor toda 
    Marshall: 5 good cross for the goal but poor otherwise
    Vetokele: 4 just not involved
    Parker: 5 one good header but otherwise no impact
    Referee: 7 one of the better ones
  • RobRob
    edited February 2019
    Phillips:   5
    Solly:   6
    Bielik:   6
    Sarr:   7
    Purrington:   6
    Cullen:  7 
    Reeves:   7
    Williams:  8
    Fosu:  5
    Marshall:   5.5
    Vetokele:  5 
    Parker:   6
    Referee:  5     
  • at the Valley or from a live stream your marks please:

    Phillips: 6.5
    Solly: 5
    Bielik: 7
    Sarr: 7
    Purrington: 6.5
    Cullen: 6.5
    Reeves: 6.5
    Williams: 7
    Fosu: 6
    Marshall: 6
    Vetokele: 5.5
    Parker: 7
    Referee: 4

    Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
    Lapslie: n
  • edited February 2019
    Phillips: 5
    Solly: 5
    Bielik: 7
    Sarr: 9
    Purrington: 6
    Cullen: 5
    Reeves: 7
    Williams: 8
    Fosu: 1
    Marshall: 3
    Vetokele: 4
    Parker: 7
    Referee: 6
  • Sponsored links:


  • Phillips: 6.5 Not a great deal to do. Deflected goal not his fault 

    Solly: 6.5 Not quite up to his usual but solid enough. 

    Bielik: 6.5 Some 8.5 stuff some 4.5 stuff hence averaging out at 6.5

    Sarr: 8 Head and shoulders above the others in all senses

    Purrington: 6.5 Substituted early in order to change formation not because of poor form

    Cullen: 6.5 Busy one or two missed passes but overall did his job

    Reeves: 6.5 His mistake led to their goal but he did well to score ours so average overall

    Williams: 6.5 Some good things but led to little. Class is evident but jury out on end product.

    Fosu: 5.5 A shadow of his former self. One cross was grotesque

    Marshall: 6.5 Gets the extra .5 for his assist. Can't fault his effort but his crossing, other than the assist, was poor

    Vetokele: 6 Ran out of gas but tried to keep going and make his runs

    Parker: 6.5 Encouraging.

    Referee: 6 Seen worse
  • Phillips:  6
    Solly:  6
    Bielik:  7
    Sarr:  8
    Purrington:  7
    Cullen:  7.5
    Reeves:  7.5
    Williams:  6.5
    Fosu:  4
    Marshall:  5
    Vetokele:  5
    Parker:  6.5
    Referee:  6
  • Phillips: 7
    Solly: 5.5
    Bielik: 7.5
    Sarr: 8
    Purrington: 7
    Cullen: 7.5
    Reeves: 7
    Williams: 7.5
    Fosu: 5
    Marshall: 6
    Vetokele: 4
    Parker: 7

    Referee: 5
  • 1StevieG said:
    Phillips: 6
    Solly: 6
    Bielik: 6
    Sarr: 7
    Purrington: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Reeves: 7
    Williams: 8
    Fosu: 7
    Marshall: 6
    Vetokele: 5
    Parker: 7
    Referee: 8
    Fosu above 
    Phillips, Solly, Bielik, Purrington and Igor

    Fosu the same as
    Sarr, Cullen, Reeves and Parker.

    What f ing game were u watching
  • Phillips: 5
    Solly: 5
    Bielik: 5
    Sarr: 6
    Purrington: 5
    Cullen: 5.5
    Reeves: 5.5
    Williams: 5.5
    Fosu: 4
    Marshall: 5
    Vetokele: 4
    Parker: 6
    Referee: 5.5
  • Phillips: 7 Unlucky with the goal, good saves late on
    Solly: 7 Usual steady performance
    Bielik: 7 Always looking to come forward
    Sarr: 8 Looking more and more assured.
    Purrington: 7 Steady performance.
    Cullen: 7.5 Always busy, works very hard./
    Reeves: 6.5 Quietish performance, extra half point for the goal.
    Williams:8.5 MOM Has a touch of class which stands out.
    Fosu: 4 Poor. The ability's there, the football brain isn't
    Marshall: 5 Got into good positions, final ball awful.
    Vetokele: 4.5 Offered very little
    Parker: 7 Encouraging cameo performance, likely starter next week.
    Referee: 

    Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a
  • Phillips: 7 couldn't do much with the goal - a bit shakier than the last few games I've seen him
    Solly: 6.5 
    Bielik: 6.5 had a mare of a first half and improved loads in the back 3. Go figure
    Sarr:  8 our best player by miles. Wish his shot had gone in
    Purrington:  6.5 unlucky to be sacrificed at HT
    Cullen: 6.5
    Reeves: 7 got a goal. Should have stayed on
    Williams: 7.5
    Fosu: 4 poor
    Marshall: 5 also poor but at least got one accurate cross in and tried
    Vetokele: 5 anonymous
    Parker: 6.5 looked up for it
    Referee: 5 - on reflection got the red card right, but our bookings were all soft and they should have had more for the timewasting

    Hackett-Fairchild - needs a loan. Not ready for the first team.
  • Phillips: 6
    Solly: 6
    Bielik: 6
    Sarr: 8
    Purrington: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Reeves: 5.5
    Williams: 6
    Fosu: 5
    Marshall: 5
    Vetokele: 5
    Parker: 6
    Referee: 3

    Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a
  • 1StevieG said:
    Phillips: 6
    Solly: 6
    Bielik: 6
    Sarr: 7
    Purrington: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Reeves: 7
    Williams: 8
    Fosu: 7
    Marshall: 6
    Vetokele: 5
    Parker: 7
    Referee: 8
    Fosu above 
    Phillips, Solly, Bielik, Purrington and Igor

    Fosu the same as
    Sarr, Cullen, Reeves and Parker.

    What f ing game were u watching
    Was meant to be a 6. Have edited it. Thanks 
  • Phillips: 6
    Solly: 5
    Bielik: 7
    Sarr: 8
    Purrington:6
    Cullen 7
    Reeves: 7
    Williams:7
    Fosu:4
    Marshall: 5
    Vetokele:5
    Parker: 7
    Referee: 5

  • Sponsored links:


  • Phillips: 6 - One shaky moment and one or two dodgy kicks. Otherwise pretty solid. 
    Solly: 5 - Sloppy.
    Bielik: 7 - Solid.
    Sarr: 8 - Him and Bielik were our most effective attacking outlet. 
    Purrington: 6 - Solid. 
    Cullen: 6 - Solid(ish)
    Reeves: 7 - Shouldn’t have been substituted. 
    Williams: 6 - Clearly a good player but never seems to lead to any goal scoring opportunities. 
    Fosu: 4 - Frustrating.
    Marshall: 6 - Think he’s been overly criticised by fans and manager alike.
    Vetokele: 5 - Anonymous. 
    Parker: 7 - Should have started. 
    Referee: 6 - One of the better refs i’ve seen this season (-1 for the lack of punishment for clear time wasting). Probably says more about the standard of refereeing we’ve seen at The Valley this season. 

    Hackett-Fairchild: Not ready and the game changed when he came on. Reminded me of when Robinson chucked Lapslie on against Blackpool in 17/18 season. We were in control but he wasn’t ready and the game turned and ended up conceding a 91st min equaliser. Could have easily been a similar story yesterday. 
    Lapslie: Looked lively as ever. 
  • Phillips: 7
    Solly: 6.5
    Bielik: 6.5
    Sarr: 8.5
    Purrington: 6.5
    Cullen: 7
    Reeves: 7
    Williams: 6.5
    Fosu: 4
    Marshall: 5
    Vetokele: 5
    Parker: 6.5
    Referee: 6

    Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a

  • Phillips: 7
    Solly: 7
    Bielik: 7
    Sarr: 8
    Purrington: 7
    Cullen: 6.5
    Reeves: 7
    Williams: 7.5
    Fosu: 6
    Marshall: 6
    Vetokele: 5.5
    Parker: 7
    Referee: 6
  • Phillips: 7
    Solly: 6
    Bielik: 6
    Sarr: 8
    Purring ton6: 
    Cullen: 6
    Reeves: 7
    Williams:7
    Fosu:3
    Marshall: 5
    Vetokele 3
    Parker7: 
  • edited February 2019
    Phillips: 6
    Solly: 6.5
    Bielik: 6
    Sarr: 8 MOM
    Purrington: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Reeves: 6
    Williams: 7.5
    Fosu: 4 Terrible
    Marshall: 4.5 Nearly as terrible
    Vetokele: 4.5 Very busy doing nothing all game.
    Parker: 6.5 Encouraging.
    Referee: 6


  • Phillips: 7 good presence, like his throws
    Solly: 6.5 better at CH
    Bielik: 8 Love watching a CB who can play
    Sarr: 9 sublime
    Purrington:  6 hurry back Lewis
    Cullen:  7.5 reminds me of Parker (Scott) wonder if Hammers might let him go
    Reeves: 7  better. More like we were promised
    Williams: 7.5 must be nightmare to mark
    Fosu: 6.5 some good amongst the bad
    Marshall: 6 extra half for part in goal
    Vetokele: 6.5 hard to play alone up front while not fit
    Parker: 7.5 needs to start
    Referee: 5 not a single booking fot time-wasting which started 1st half. 
  • at the Valley or from a live stream your marks please:

    Phillips: 6.5 ... a small mix-up with Bielik first half, a couple of dodgy kicks, no chance with the goal, good saves at the end preserved a point
    Solly: 5.5 ... not his best game
    Bielik: 6 ... some suspect moments at the back, had a cracking shot second half
    Sarr: 9 ... MoTM by a country mile. Defensively solid, had one of the best shots of the match, put in one of the best crosses, skinned a couple of defenders on a rampaging run into the box
    Purrington: 6 ... didn't do much wrong first half, unlucky to be sacrificed for Parker at HT
    Cullen: 6 ... OK
    Reeves: 6 ... a mixed bag: scored the goal, put in some good corners, but gave away the ball for their goal and some of his other play was ropey
    Williams: 6.5 ... pick of the midfield
    Fosu: 3.5 ... oh dear
    Marshall: 5.5 ... good cross for the goal but the rest of his deliveries were awful
    Vetokele: 5.5 ... didn't do much but, in his defence, he didn't have any service
    Parker: 7 ... looked good when he came on, surely must be in the starting XI next week
    Referee: 5 ... too weak, allowed Southend to get away with too many cynical fouls and disgraceful timewasting

    Hackett-Fairchild: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a


  • edited February 2019
    Phillips: 7 - made a couple of very important blocks and saves at the end, unlucky with the goal.
    Solly: 6 - should've been played in numerous times in the first half, but we moved the ball too slow. Should've been on the right of the three second half.
    Bielik: 5.5 - nearly scored but showing his inexperience and potentially playing in midfield has not benefited him with his decision making, takes far too many touches. Now misses two games.
    Sarr: 8 - best player on the pitch. He is fast becoming a fan favourite.
    Purrington: 5 - can't give more than that as he only played first half where he done okay but he isn't Page who would've suited us far better when they went down to 10.
    Cullen: 6.5 - kept us ticking over well but doesn't offer much going forward. I know that wasn't his job but even his delivery yesterday was poor.
    Reeves: 7 - okay first half but really needs to take on board what Bows and Jacko are telling him, better in the second half, a good header, and I thought he should've stayed on. 
    Williams: 6.5 - holds onto the ball for a long time but he is a very good player, wrap him up in cotton wool as he is getting kicked so much.
    Fosu: 2 - waste of time so not wasting my time writing how poor he was yesterday.
    Marshall: 5 - out of position for a lot of the game but it was worth a go, he was unlucky to come off I feel and it was a good assist.
    Vetokele: 5.5 - good to see him get 90 minutes, looked sharper than I thought he would be and probably should've scored at one point, service to him was poor and tempo of our play didn't help his game.
    Parker: 6 - only other decent option on the bench that we had going forward. Played okay but hope there is much more to come.

    Referee: 6 - correct decision to send their man off. Reeves' booking was not a yellow, otherwise he was fair.

  • Phillips: 6.5
    Solly: 7
    Bielik: 6.5
    Sarr: 6.5
    Purrington: 6.5
    Cullen: 7.5
    Reeves: 7.5
    Williams:5
    Fosu: 5
    Marshall: 4.5
    Vetokele: 4
    Parker: 7.5
    Referee: 6.5

  • Phillips: 7
    Solly: 6
    Bielik: 6
    Sarr: 8
    Purrington: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Reeves: 7
    Williams: 7
    Fosu: 4
    Marshall: 6
    Vetokele: 6
    Parker: 7
    Referee: 6

Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!