You
are of course well within your legal right to cut the tree branches back to the
boundary line on your side and I’m happy for you to do so provided you adhere
to the following:
1.
Only prune/cut up to the boundary line, that being the dirt line between
Reg end of my front wall next to your path edge and my wall at the top of this
dirt strip;
2.
Legally you will also be aware that any infringement of workmen working
over this line/leaning against the tree or any cuts beyond this line on a
vertical plain is illegal and could result in charges of trespass and/or
criminal damage;
3.
Please dispose of the cuttings, we don’t want them - thank you."
I understood the above to be him saying go ahead. So I asked him to confirm.
Apparently, it didn't and he was still proposing to prune the tree and said he'd update me within the week, which he did. The above was only him confirming my legal rights.
I agreed to wait the week, but said I would be cutting the tree back to the boundary in any case, if his chap didn't.
So at the end of the week he suggested I go ahead and afterwards he would instruct a surgeon for his "side". This made sense to me, so I contacted a tree surgeon I've used before and agreed to do the work.
Unfortunately, he's come off his bike & damaged perhaps fractured ribs and won't be available for 4 weeks.
As I've waited 7 years, I've decided another 4 weeks won't hurt and I'm expecting it to be cut end April/early May.
You
are of course well within your legal right to cut the tree branches back to the
boundary line on your side and I’m happy for you to do so provided you adhere
to the following:
1.
Only prune/cut up to the boundary line, that being the dirt line between
Reg end of my front wall next to your path edge and my wall at the top of this
dirt strip;
2.
Legally you will also be aware that any infringement of workmen working
over this line/leaning against the tree or any cuts beyond this line on a
vertical plain is illegal and could result in charges of trespass and/or
criminal damage;
3.
Please dispose of the cuttings, we don’t want them - thank you."
I understood the above to be him saying go ahead. So I asked him to confirm.
Apparently, it didn't and he was still proposing to prune the tree and said he'd update me within the week, which he did. The above was only him confirming my legal rights.
I agreed to wait the week, but said I would be cutting the tree back to the boundary in any case, if his chap didn't.
So at the end of the week he suggested I go ahead and afterwards he would instruct a surgeon for his "side". This made sense to me, so I contacted a tree surgeon I've used before and agreed to do the work.
Unfortunately, he's come off his bike & damaged perhaps fractured ribs and won't be available for 4 weeks.
As I've waited 7 years, I've decided another 4 weeks won't hurt and I'm expecting it to be cut end April/early May.
What will happen first the takeover or the tree being cut?
You
are of course well within your legal right to cut the tree branches back to the
boundary line on your side and I’m happy for you to do so provided you adhere
to the following:
1.
Only prune/cut up to the boundary line, that being the dirt line between
Reg end of my front wall next to your path edge and my wall at the top of this
dirt strip;
2.
Legally you will also be aware that any infringement of workmen working
over this line/leaning against the tree or any cuts beyond this line on a
vertical plain is illegal and could result in charges of trespass and/or
criminal damage;
3.
Please dispose of the cuttings, we don’t want them - thank you."
I think you can only be charged with trespassing if there's intent to commit a crime, e.g vandalism or theft.
You
are of course well within your legal right to cut the tree branches back to the
boundary line on your side and I’m happy for you to do so provided you adhere
to the following:
1.
Only prune/cut up to the boundary line, that being the dirt line between
Reg end of my front wall next to your path edge and my wall at the top of this
dirt strip;
2.
Legally you will also be aware that any infringement of workmen working
over this line/leaning against the tree or any cuts beyond this line on a
vertical plain is illegal and could result in charges of trespass and/or
criminal damage;
3.
Please dispose of the cuttings, we don’t want them - thank you."
I understood the above to be him saying go ahead. So I asked him to confirm.
Apparently, it didn't and he was still proposing to prune the tree and said he'd update me within the week, which he did. The above was only him confirming my legal rights.
I agreed to wait the week, but said I would be cutting the tree back to the boundary in any case, if his chap didn't.
So at the end of the week he suggested I go ahead and afterwards he would instruct a surgeon for his "side". This made sense to me, so I contacted a tree surgeon I've used before and agreed to do the work.
Unfortunately, he's come off his bike & damaged perhaps fractured ribs and won't be available for 4 weeks.
As I've waited 7 years, I've decided another 4 weeks won't hurt and I'm expecting it to be cut end April/early May.
You
are of course well within your legal right to cut the tree branches back to the
boundary line on your side and I’m happy for you to do so provided you adhere
to the following:
1.
Only prune/cut up to the boundary line, that being the dirt line between
Reg end of my front wall next to your path edge and my wall at the top of this
dirt strip;
2.
Legally you will also be aware that any infringement of workmen working
over this line/leaning against the tree or any cuts beyond this line on a
vertical plain is illegal and could result in charges of trespass and/or
criminal damage;
3.
Please dispose of the cuttings, we don’t want them - thank you."
I understood the above to be him saying go ahead. So I asked him to confirm.
Apparently, it didn't and he was still proposing to prune the tree and said he'd update me within the week, which he did. The above was only him confirming my legal rights.
I agreed to wait the week, but said I would be cutting the tree back to the boundary in any case, if his chap didn't.
So at the end of the week he suggested I go ahead and afterwards he would instruct a surgeon for his "side". This made sense to me, so I contacted a tree surgeon I've used before and agreed to do the work.
Unfortunately, he's come off his bike & damaged perhaps fractured ribs and won't be available for 4 weeks.
As I've waited 7 years, I've decided another 4 weeks won't hurt and I'm expecting it to be cut end April/early May.
You
are of course well within your legal right to cut the tree branches back to the
boundary line on your side and I’m happy for you to do so provided you adhere
to the following:
1.
Only prune/cut up to the boundary line, that being the dirt line between
Reg end of my front wall next to your path edge and my wall at the top of this
dirt strip;
2.
Legally you will also be aware that any infringement of workmen working
over this line/leaning against the tree or any cuts beyond this line on a
vertical plain is illegal and could result in charges of trespass and/or
criminal damage;
3.
Please dispose of the cuttings, we don’t want them - thank you."
I understood the above to be him saying go ahead. So I asked him to confirm.
Apparently, it didn't and he was still proposing to prune the tree and said he'd update me within the week, which he did. The above was only him confirming my legal rights.
I agreed to wait the week, but said I would be cutting the tree back to the boundary in any case, if his chap didn't.
So at the end of the week he suggested I go ahead and afterwards he would instruct a surgeon for his "side". This made sense to me, so I contacted a tree surgeon I've used before and agreed to do the work.
Unfortunately, he's come off his bike & damaged perhaps fractured ribs and won't be available for 4 weeks.
As I've waited 7 years, I've decided another 4 weeks won't hurt and I'm expecting it to be cut end April/early May.
You see this is what they do. They tell all the other tree surgeons and one by one they all feign injury or sickness.
I'm surprised you've not thought about this before.
You
are of course well within your legal right to cut the tree branches back to the
boundary line on your side and I’m happy for you to do so provided you adhere
to the following:
1.
Only prune/cut up to the boundary line, that being the dirt line between
Reg end of my front wall next to your path edge and my wall at the top of this
dirt strip;
2.
Legally you will also be aware that any infringement of workmen working
over this line/leaning against the tree or any cuts beyond this line on a
vertical plain is illegal and could result in charges of trespass and/or
criminal damage;
3.
Please dispose of the cuttings, we don’t want them - thank you."
.
Unfortunately, he's come off his bike & damaged perhaps fractured ribs and won't be available for 4 weeks.
As I've waited 7 years, I've decided another 4 weeks won't hurt and I'm expecting it to be cut end April/early May.
I'll come round and help you cut the over hanging trees. We'll then dump them back over the fence. Exactly what I did when it happened to me. They are taking the piss out of you.
You
are of course well within your legal right to cut the tree branches back to the
boundary line on your side and I’m happy for you to do so provided you adhere
to the following:
1.
Only prune/cut up to the boundary line, that being the dirt line between
Reg end of my front wall next to your path edge and my wall at the top of this
dirt strip;
2.
Legally you will also be aware that any infringement of workmen working
over this line/leaning against the tree or any cuts beyond this line on a
vertical plain is illegal and could result in charges of trespass and/or
criminal damage;
3.
Please dispose of the cuttings, we don’t want them - thank you."
I understood the above to be him saying go ahead. So I asked him to confirm.
Apparently, it didn't and he was still proposing to prune the tree and said he'd update me within the week, which he did. The above was only him confirming my legal rights.
I agreed to wait the week, but said I would be cutting the tree back to the boundary in any case, if his chap didn't.
So at the end of the week he suggested I go ahead and afterwards he would instruct a surgeon for his "side". This made sense to me, so I contacted a tree surgeon I've used before and agreed to do the work.
Unfortunately, he's come off his bike & damaged perhaps fractured ribs and won't be available for 4 weeks.
As I've waited 7 years, I've decided another 4 weeks won't hurt and I'm expecting it to be cut end April/early May.
You must be the most patient man going.
I think i'd have got annoyed waiting a couple of weeks, never mind 7 years.
They are (rightly) very protective of their trees down here @Stu_of_Kunming and this isn't the first prosecution or POCA proceedings over someone ignoring a TPO to increase the value of their property.
Comments
So I asked him to confirm.
Apparently, it didn't and he was still proposing to prune the tree and said he'd update me within the week, which he did.
The above was only him confirming my legal rights.
I agreed to wait the week, but said I would be cutting the tree back to the boundary in any case, if his chap didn't.
So at the end of the week he suggested I go ahead and afterwards he would instruct a surgeon for his "side".
This made sense to me, so I contacted a tree surgeon I've used before and agreed to do the work.
Unfortunately, he's come off his bike & damaged perhaps fractured ribs and won't be available for 4 weeks.
As I've waited 7 years, I've decided another 4 weeks won't hurt and I'm expecting it to be cut end April/early May.
I'm surprised you've not thought about this before.
I think i'd have got annoyed waiting a couple of weeks, never mind 7 years.
I can't say I'm bothered anymore. I just wish I'd got it chopped years ago, instead of being so Russell Slade like
I'm hoping she's in doors sobbing. He's not home yet.
@Bournemouth Addick
Don't have a problem with it myself.