VAR - are you a fan?

queensland_addick

VAR is using highly sophisticated technology, but the outcome is still determined by human eyes and judgement. This is resulting in long disruptions to the game, human error, and mistrust from fans.

All the information, Laws of the game, camera angles etc needs, need to be fed into AI, Ai will then make an almost instantaneous decision, the result being far more accurate than is possible from humans sitting in a box, under pressure to make a decision from the crowd, and time constraints.

Fan's would appreciate the almost instantaneous decision that has been made, given all the available information, and done so without any perceived bias.

A full explanation of any decisions could be provided on a website for fans to read following the game, if they are interested to know.

I think you either don't have VAR at all, or, if you are going to use technology, it has to be the very best and most accurate that is available.

Algarveaddick

queensland_addick said:

VAR is using highly sophisticated technology, but the outcome is still determined by human eyes and judgement. This is resulting in long disruptions to the game, human error, and mistrust from fans.

All the information, Laws of the game, camera angles etc needs, need to be fed into AI, Ai will then make an almost instantaneous decision, the result being far more accurate than is possible from humans sitting in a box, under pressure to make a decision from the crowd, and time constraints.

Fan's would appreciate the almost instantaneous decision that has been made, given all the available information, and done so without any perceived bias.

A full explanation of any decisions could be provided on a website for fans to read following the game, if they are interested to know.

I think you either don't have VAR at all, or, if you are going to use technology, it has to be the very best and most accurate that is available.

AI will probably award a second down, behind the popping crease with a ten second penalty for speeding in the pit lane... 

SuedeAdidas

Algarveaddick said:

queensland_addick said:

VAR is using highly sophisticated technology, but the outcome is still determined by human eyes and judgement. This is resulting in long disruptions to the game, human error, and mistrust from fans.

All the information, Laws of the game, camera angles etc needs, need to be fed into AI, Ai will then make an almost instantaneous decision, the result being far more accurate than is possible from humans sitting in a box, under pressure to make a decision from the crowd, and time constraints.

Fan's would appreciate the almost instantaneous decision that has been made, given all the available information, and done so without any perceived bias.

A full explanation of any decisions could be provided on a website for fans to read following the game, if they are interested to know.

I think you either don't have VAR at all, or, if you are going to use technology, it has to be the very best and most accurate that is available.

AI will probably award a second down, behind the popping crease with a ten second penalty for speeding in the pit lane... 

Yeah… but that’s where the Coach’s Challenge comes in 👍🏼

Callumcafc

Interesting watching baseball grapple with newly introduced video assistance and fine margins between balls and strikes, reminds me of marginal offside decisions.

Chizz

Goal allowed by VAR. 

This is the first goal to be ruled "ok" under the new, experimental FIFA daylight rule/law.  The two players standing in offside positions were ruled not to have been offside when the player made his (saved) goal attempt.  The player on the corner of the six-yard box netted the rebound off the goalkeeper.  

redman

That's ridiculous. Both are clearly offside. 

Dansk_Red

Championship Clubs have rejected the use of VAR next season.

Chippycafc

VAR should only be used for matters of fact not matter of opinion. If it takes more than a few seconds to decide then it isn't an issue. 

clive

Championship clubs have turned down the chance to introduce a version of the video assistant referee system for next season.

Football Video Support (FVS), a variation of VAR which needs fewer resources and gives each coach two reviews per game, could have been brought in from August.

Professional Game Match Officials (PGMO) gave a presentation at the EFL's annual meeting last month.

The EFL subsequently canvassed feedback but it was clear clubs were strongly against any kind of video review system in the Championship.

BBC Sport understands the idea is closed for the foreseeable future and the idea is unlikely to be resurrected by the clubs in a year's time.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c17vjwe4gyro

Callumcafc

Chippycafc said:

VAR should only be used for matters of fact not matter of opinion. If it takes more than a few seconds to decide then it isn't an issue. 

So you’re ok with offsides under VAR?

Chippycafc

Callumcafc said:

Chippycafc said:

VAR should only be used for matters of fact not matter of opinion. If it takes more than a few seconds to decide then it isn't an issue. 

So you’re ok with offsides under VAR?

No cos it takes too long and they still get it wrong. VAR should be scrapped. 

JaShea99

It was refreshing to see that (bar the penalty) there were no real VAR checks for all 9 goals in the CL last night.