Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Millwall v Charlton (closes Monday teatime)

2»

Comments

  • Phillips; 7
    Lockyer: 7
    Pearce: 5.5
    Sarr: 4
    Mathews: 6
    Gallagher: 7.5
    Cullen: 8
    Pratley: 8.5
    Purrington: 5
    Leko: 5
    Bonne: 6
  • Phillips 8  He has grown enormously since he last appeared at the Toolbox . One reason I preferred Rudd that season was how they had respectively played against the Spanners
    Lockyer: 7 I like him . Lets ensure he signs a new contract he has proved himself at this.
    Pearce 6 . Reasonable
    Sarr: 5 Clearly to blame for the second but he did provide an assist . I regard 5 as below par which is why that is the mark I have awarded  
    Mathews: 8 Apart from one appalling foul throw on I thought he was outstanding . He is a better Right Wing Back than Solly and has given us a genuine squad option
    Gallagher: 6 Disappointed in him today.
    Cullen 7 Kept to his task well 
    Pratley: 7 Wish he had not been booked . Suspect that is why he was subbed 
    Purrington: 5 Is he fit ? Like Solly he is a better full back than wing back 
    Leko: 6 Not sure about him but he gains a point for taking his goal well 
    Bonne: 6 Think he has done well but needs someone like Hemed ( if match fit ) or Taylor as a partner 

    Kayal: Don't think he is a bad player Hope he can get fit as he is going to be needed with Field and Pratley unavailable  
    Lapslie: When he came on I realised we were holding on for a draw , but to be fair what other options did we have ? 

  • Phillips; 8
    Lockyer: 7
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 2
    Mathews: 7
    Gallagher: 7.5
    Cullen: 7
    Pratley: 7
    Purrington: 6
    Leko: 6
    Bonne: 6
    Referee: 7
  • At  the Den 

    Phillips; 7 Nice save  but some dodgy distribution.
    Lockyer: 5 several poor passes today
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 4 Allowed Smith to power over him for the winning goal.
    Mathews: 5
    Gallagher: 6 Targeted by Thompson and co but played okay.
    Cullen: 7 Played with gusto my MOM.
    Pratley: 6 Nice touches- shame he went off.
    Purrington: 5.5 kept Wallace quiet
    Leko: 6 
    Bonne: 6 goalie did well to keep out his shot. 
    Referee: 7 No real complaints. Scum might have been awarded a penalty early on. Was pretty much neutral.
  • Phillips: 7
    Lockyer: 7
    Pearce:  6
    Sarr: 3
    Mathews: 6
    Gallagher: 6
    Cullen: 8
    Pratley: 8
    Purrington: 5
    Leko: 4
    Bonne: 5
    Referee: 7

  • Phillips: 8
    Lockyer: 7
    Pearce:  6
    Sarr: 4
    Mathews: 7
    Gallagher: 6
    Cullen: 8
    Pratley: 8
    Purrington: 5
    Leko: 6
    Bonne: 7
    Referee: 7


  • Phillips; 7.5
    Lockyer: 7
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 4
    Mathews: 7.5
    Gallagher: 6.5
    Cullen: 8
    Pratley: 7
    Purrington: 5
    Leko: 5.5
    Bonne: 7
    Referee: 7
  • Phillips;  7
    Lockyer:  7
    Pearce:  6
    Sarr:  4
    Mathews:  6
    Gallagher:  6
    Cullen:  7.5
    Pratley:  7
    Purrington:  6.5
    Leko:  4
    Bonne:  6
    Referee:  6
  • Phillips; 7
    Lockyer: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 2
    Mathews: 6
    Gallagher: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Pratley 8
    Purrington 6
    Leko 7
    Bonne: 6
    Referee: 7
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited November 2019
    Phillips; 7.5
    Lockyer: 7
    Pearce: 6.5
    Sarr: 4   (knock off the two times he fell asleep and we won 0-1)
    Mathews: 7
    Gallagher: 6.5
    Cullen: 7
    Pratley: 7.5 MOM
    Purrington: 6
    Leko: 5 I just can't understand how a player can stand around, disinterested, staring at the ground, when the ball is close. 
    Bonne: 7
    Referee: 7.5 Got little to nothing wrong.
  • edited November 2019

    Referee: 7.5 Got little to nothing wrong.
    Apart from the assault on Sarr, miles before the ball arrived. 

  • Referee: 7.5 Got little to nothing wrong.
    Apart from the assault on Sarr, miles before the ball arrived. 
    I think your good self & Leuth are about the only 2 who doesn't think Sarr was at fault.
    No further proof required. Case closed. Sorry LL.
  • Bailey said:
    At corners you defend against players behind you. If guy peeled off and got in front of Naby, his fault. Goalscorer was in front all the time so was someone else's responsibility
    obviously you have never played football then, if he is behind you how do you track his movement unless you have eyes in the back of your head. If you want an example watch Pearce at Fulham.

    You keep looking behind you....like turn your head from time to time. A defender has to be goal side. Basic defending. Still think Sarr was fouled for their winner.......although if he had made a move towards the ball it might have helped.

    Oops.....just realised this is the marks thread.
  • At the New Den or on a live stream, your marks please

    Phillips;   7
    Lockyer:  7
    Pearce:    6
    Sarr:          5.5
    Mathews:  7
    Gallagher:   7
    Cullen:      7.5
    Pratley:       7
    Purrington:   6
    Leko:           5.5
    Bonne:         7
    Referee:       0. Would have been a foul the other way round. Especially down their end. I bet he didn't have to wait 45 mins to leave either 

    Kayal: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a
  • Nabster heading for a record low score here.....
  • Stream

    Phillips; 7
    Lockyer: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 5 Technically it might might have been a foul, but attack the ball and you’re not relying on the ref. Good assist though.
    Mathews: 6.5
    Gallagher: 6
    Cullen: 7.5 Ran with the ball well
    Pratley 8 Should have stayed on 
    Purrington 6
    Leko 5.5 Improved after looking disinterested. 
    Bonne: 7 Had the volley gone in...
    Referee: 6 

  • Phillips; 8
    Lockyer: 8
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 4
    Mathews: 6
    Gallagher: 7
    Cullen: 8
    Pratley: 8
    Purrington: 5
    Leko: 5
    Bonne: 7
    Referee: 7
  • Phillips; 8
    Lockyer: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 4
    Mathews:5 
    Gallagher: 6
    Cullen: 7
    Pratley: 8
    Purrington: 5 
    Leko: 5
    Bonne:6
  • edited November 2019
    Phillips; 7.5
    Lockyer: 6
    Pearce: 5.5
    Sarr: 3 That last goal was unforgivable (finally forced myself to watch the highlights)
    Mathews: 4.5 Don't understand the high scores at all
    Gallagher: 6.5
    Cullen: 7.5
    Pratley: 7.5
    Purrington: 4.5
    Leko: 4 Disgraceful performance
    Bonne: 7

  • Sponsored links:


  • Phillips; 7
    Lockyer: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Sarr: 5
    Mathews: 6
    Gallagher: 7
    Cullen: 6
    Pratley: 7
    Purrington: 6
    Leko: 5
    Bonne: 6
    Referee: 6
    Kayal 5
  • Phillips; 6
    Lockyer: 5
    Pearce: 5
    Sarr: 4
    Mathews:5 
    Gallagher: 6
    Cullen: 6
    Pratley: 7
    Purrington: 5 
    Leko: 4
    Bonne:6
  • At the game

    Phillips; 7
    Lockyer: 6
    Pearce: 6.5
    Sarr: 3.5
    Mathews: 6 
    Gallagher: 6.5
    Cullen: 6.5
    Pratley: 7
    Purrington: 5.5
    Leko: 5
    Bonne: 6
    Referee: 7
  • Sat there at the shit hole.....

    Phillips; 7 - brilliant save to keep us in it, but his kicking was very poor, and could he have done better with their first? 
    Lockyer: 7 - Really has settled into the team well, and is full of heart, 
    Pearce: 6 - Felt he could have reigned Naby in more with him being Cappo and having him to his left. Decent game. 
    Sarr: 4 - Take away that ridiculous decision to go down easy and lose us the game.... how many passes did he complete? Awful. 
    Mathews: 5 - Wasn't impressed, and looked scared to challenge at times. 
    Gallagher: 6 - Wasn't at his best today. 
    Cullen: 8 - Such a tidy player, did everything well, and wasn't afraid to make a challenge. 
    Pratley: 6 - Looked lively, made some good challenges, but looked tired at times. 
    Purrington: 5 - Not sure what he offers at times. 
    Leko: 6 - If it wasn't for the goal then he would have been a 5. Did nothing else. 
    Bonne: 7 - Full of running and battling up top, unlucky not to score too. 
    Referee: 6

    Kayal: n/a
    Lapslie: n/a
  • Phillips;   8
    Lockyer:  7
    Pearce:   7
    Sarr:      4
    Mathews: 6
    Gallagher: 8
    Cullen:  8
    Pratley: 7
    Purrington: 5
    Leko: 5
    Bonne: 7
    Referee: 7
  • Can't believe Purrington scoring so low, granted I only gave him a 6 but he didn't do much wrong to warrant the 4s and 5s... he kept Jed Wallace who is arguably their best player quiet for most of the game.
  • Phillips; 7.5
    Lockyer: 5
    Pearce: 5
    Sarr: 2.5
    Mathews: 4
    Gallagher: 4.5
    Cullen: 6
    Pratley: 6
    Purrington: 4
    Leko: 4
    Bonne: 5
  • At the game:

    Phillips; 8 not at fault for the goals, made a couple of smart saves and punches
    Lockyer: 7 the most composed of the back three
    Pearce: 6 battling performance 
    Sarr: 2 terrible
    Mathews: 5 looked a but shellshocked
    Gallagher: 6 tried hard
    Cullen: 6 worked tirelessly trying to make things happen
    Pratley: 5 not his best game
    Purrington: 5 not much to say
    Leko: 5 marked up for the goal, but didnt look interested 
    Bonne: 6 worked hard, should have buried that header though
    Referee: 2 weak under pressure from the home crowd

    Kayal: n/a awful
    Lapslie: n/a got to worth a place in the starting line up for the next game?
  • Too annoyed to give marks. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!