You do all realise that all these esi announcements aren't written by HE or Southall but by PR guru Paul McCarthy?
The intentions are good and the pr slick but suspect HR has never heard of the Valley Party or Derek Hales.
You can't say that with any certainty.
I've written my fair share of CEO statements and columns and they will either send over bullet points or messy paragraphs or even give you a call to tell you roughly what they want to say.
You do all realise that all these esi announcements aren't written by HE or Southall but by PR guru Paul McCarthy?
The intentions are good and the pr slick but suspect HR has never heard of the Valley Party or Derek Hales.
So how come Roland couldn’t get it right then?
Katrien
Sure but the point is he didn't even try and get it right. Slick PR shows that these guys want to get it right and are putting in effort in the hope it will make a difference.
Welcome to the Wally. My name is Roland and I do as I want and don't care what you want. It is my club and not yours after all. I do things my way and you should be grateful because I am better than all of you losers put together.
Very pleased indeed to read His Exellency's comments...very positive stuff and light years apart from the RD regime's misguided nonsense. Long may it continue. Look forward to seeing how this all develops, step by step ahead.
Assumed first off it was probably penned for him, you only need to look at his Intagram to see his English isn't as good as mine. But as said above, Hi must've gave it his stamp before it was published.
Assumed first off it was probably penned for him, you only need to look at his Intagram to see his English isn't as good as mine. But as said above, Hi must've gave it his stamp before it was published.
I saw a video of him at a conference and his English was fluent
Assumed first off it was probably penned for him, you only need to look at his Intagram to see his English isn't as good as mine. But as said above, Hi must've gave it his stamp before it was published.
I saw a video of him at a conference and his English was fluent
Assumed first off it was probably penned for him, you only need to look at his Intagram to see his English isn't as good as mine. But as said above, Hi must've gave it his stamp before it was published.
I saw a video of him at a conference and his English was fluent
I've seen it too, but I don't believe that means his written English is spot on. Look at his Instagram
But not wanting to get into another trivial argument over something that don't even matter, I'll leave it there mate
Assumed first off it was probably penned for him, you only need to look at his Intagram to see his English isn't as good as mine. But as said above, Hi must've gave it his stamp before it was published.
I saw a video of him at a conference and his English was fluent
Perfect and he speaks four other languages, he is one sharp cookie 👌😁
Will they get a monetary return on their investment ?
I don’t get why they’d “invest” in football or us !
Long term if they get it right very much so...
what clubs with stadiums with a capacity below 30k are making money in the premier league ?
There is the potential to make a profit in the Premier League, irrespective of capacity, because of the level of TV money. It all depends on how much you spend in the transfer market and on wages. There is also the point that the value of the club increases massively just by getting there.
Will they get a monetary return on their investment ?
I don’t get why they’d “invest” in football or us !
Long term if they get it right very much so...
what clubs with stadiums with a capacity below 30k are making money in the premier league ?
Norwich, Nigels, Burnley, Bournemouth, Watford
None of the premier league clubs need any ticket revenue to make a profit, it was calculated the increase in the current TV deal is so much greater than the previous deal all Premier League clubs could have thrown the doors open for free and still made more money than under the previous deal.
That said I'd still like to see The Valley completed to 40,000 especially if the new owners can keep us up in the Premier League should we get there.
Will they get a monetary return on their investment ?
I don’t get why they’d “invest” in football or us !
Long term if they get it right very much so...
what clubs with stadiums with a capacity below 30k are making money in the premier league ?
Norwich, Nigels, Burnley, Bournemouth, Watford
None of the premier league clubs need any ticket revenue to make a profit, it was calculated the increase in the current TV deal is so much greater than the previous deal all Premier League clubs could have thrown the doors open for free and still made more money than under the previous deal.
That said I'd still like to see The Valley completed to 40,000 especially if the new owners can keep us up in the Premier League should we get there.
I thought I’d read that Josh Harris and the American investors at palace wanted out due to the crazy wages and transfer fees, as in it wasn’t worth it .
Chelsea are £1.125b in debt, yes to the owner , but let that sink in. £1.125b. Madness. The club is unsellable without Abramovich waiving most or all of that debt. He’s got the club by the balls . Which is ironic considering their fan base are cnuts.
Chelsea are £1.125b in debt, yes to the owner , but let that sink in. £1.125b. Madness. The club is unsellable without Abramovich waiving most or all of that debt. He’s got the club by the balls . Which is ironic considering their fan base are cnuts.
After giving that a quick read the only people "trousering" money are the Glaziers. And I don't mean Crystal Palace
Chelsea are £1.125b in debt, yes to the owner , but let that sink in. £1.125b. Madness. The club is unsellable without Abramovich waiving most or all of that debt. He’s got the club by the balls . Which is ironic considering their fan base are cnuts.
What strikes me is how little impact gate receipts have on total turnover. Our gate receipts are only £2m lower than some Premier clubs.
Why do clubs incur massive debt to increase capacity, even if it’s doubled? Guess it makes sense if it has a material knock on effect on commercial revenue or its a property play.
I have to say I found it a bit odd seeing his picture in the match day programme particularly wearing his traditional costume, despite the ghost written words.
And before anyone jumps on me, I don’t say that from a prejudiced, discriminatory or biased point of view. Just from the perspective of what has been the norm for us over the years! Duchebag, Murray, Slater, Huyler and probably the Gliksteins all suited and booted.
The changing face and money of football I guess and hopefully a good one for us and Charlton.
Comments
I've written my fair share of CEO statements and columns and they will either send over bullet points or messy paragraphs or even give you a call to tell you roughly what they want to say.
He put his name to them. They are published. They are statements that require accountability. And they are very much saying the right things
They’re are no negatives here.
;-)
But not wanting to get into another trivial argument over something that don't even matter, I'll leave it there mate
He has many contacts both in the UAE and in the UK that he would of spoken to before making this investment.
There is also the point that the value of the club increases massively just by getting there.
None of the premier league clubs need any ticket revenue to make a profit, it was calculated the increase in the current TV deal is so much greater than the previous deal all Premier League clubs could have thrown the doors open for free and still made more money than under the previous deal.
That said I'd still like to see The Valley completed to 40,000 especially if the new owners can keep us up in the Premier League should we get there.
Why do clubs incur massive debt to increase capacity, even if it’s doubled? Guess it makes sense if it has a material knock on effect on commercial revenue or its a property play.
And before anyone jumps on me, I don’t say that from a prejudiced, discriminatory or biased point of view. Just from the perspective of what has been the norm for us over the years! Duchebag, Murray, Slater, Huyler and probably the Gliksteins all suited and booted.
The changing face and money of football I guess and hopefully a good one for us and Charlton.