many thanks to the 98 Lifers who gave marks, I have credited our 2nd goal to Lockyer in keeping with the OS match report which gives Doughty an assist:
Surprised the referee got higher marks than at QPR or WBA. Didn't see the Boro game.
I noticed you have given the goal to Lockyer. Don't disagree although officially it was an og. However no assist given so the crosser, Doughty, in your table.
Surely it's an assist from Lockyer for the og, no?
Thanks as ever for the 'above and beyond' effort you put into this, LL.
yes it is if it is an go, but I am following the lead of the CAFC match report which credits the goal to Lockyer and therefore the assist is with Alfie who made the cross to Lockyer. Now if CAFC confirm an og then I'll change it.
Surely it's an assist from Lockyer for the og, no?
Thanks as ever for the 'above and beyond' effort you put into this, LL.
yes it is if it is an go, but I am following the lead of the CAFC match report which credits the goal to Lockyer and therefore the assist is with Alfie who made the cross to Lockyer. Now if CAFC confirm an og then I'll change it.
Lockyer’s accepted he didn’t score in the article in the SLP on-line. The league says og. Why does CAFC’s opinion trump that?
I’d be happy if Lockyer had scored but should we not be steering clear of “alternative facts”?
Pratley one yellow from a 2 match ban, we need Cullen and Field back pronto! If I had a criticism of him this season, it's the number of soft yellows for dissent, which he should be avoiding at his age
Gallagher 2 yellows from a 2 match ban too so bad news for Swansea allegedly!
Comments
I noticed you have given the goal to Lockyer. Don't disagree although officially it was an og. However no assist given so the crosser, Doughty, in your table.
Thanks as ever for the 'above and beyond' effort you put into this, LL.
Now if CAFC confirm an og then I'll change it.
I’d be happy if Lockyer had scored but should we not be steering clear of “alternative facts”?
Gallagher 2 yellows from a 2 match ban too so bad news for Swansea allegedly!
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Don't worry Locks, we've got your back!<br><br>The club will be submitting a claim to the <a href="https://twitter.com/EFL?ref_src=twsrc^tfw">@EFL</a>'s dubious goals panel in an attempt to get the goal given back to him 💪 <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/cafc?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc^tfw">#cafc</a></p>— Charlton Athletic FC (@CAFCofficial) <a href="