Although the team still have an outstanding fixture away to Reading we are relegated according to a computer simulation system devised at the University there.
Seemingly, it runs all of the remaining fixtures 10,000 times having fed in certain known parameters at the time of the cessation of games.
Then its something to do with percentages but the bottom of the table sees us down along with Luton and Barnsley all in the same positions which those teams currently occupy. The only 'winners' are Wigan who leap out of the bottom 6.
But this is football for heaven's sake - if they ran the Charlton v Huddersfield game a million times over on a computer when we were 1-5 down, with 10 men and only 28 mins left - how often would it give us a 7-6 victory?
Championship: Experts at University of Reading predict the 'final table'
By Brent Pilnick
BBC Sport
Comments
They will be updating their tables, obviously they have been doing this every week, and will reveal the final table next week.
Not a surprise we ended up in the forecast bottom 3, we weren't playing well and our remaining fixtures were quite hard too. Our only hope would be that Hull do even worse than us!
So according to that we'd have been depressed at Leeds away, conceding 4, watching them celebrating the league win & promotion.
Would like to see these experts predict it at the start of the season. They can take the betting companies to the cleaners
.
I imagine a lot of people would have predicted that last summer.
I dont get people saying things like this saw one the other day say Hull would have slaughtered us.
Football is unpredictable, who knows what may or may not have happened but nothing is a given in football results, we have proved that ourselves this season.
Would Leeds have won, more than likely yes but there is a chance we could have caused an upset like we did back in September
Taylor for Leko
Green for Gallagher
Add to that the likelihood of Matthews for Solly
And would the squad if been MUCH worse of than the team that beat Leeds in September
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52507779
According to Sky, we stay up
http://c.newsnow.co.uk/A/1030106227?-11197:833
I think I will agree with FM
Shouldn't this be in the conditional using 'would'?;-