These people used to stand on the Strand ranting about these things
There are some very strange people out there in the world.
Can you get away with calling a judged "crooked" just because a case has gone against you?
Blimey! Not sure what to think about their criticism of Judge Pearce. Do his past actions suggest that he might disregard a strong case in a way that we get the wrong decision? If so, I guess the key question is who has the strongest case; Elliott or Panorame? Maybe he will sit on the fence and defer to someone else to make the decision at a future stage of the court process. So many questions........
These people used to stand on the Strand ranting about these things
There are some very strange people out there in the world.
Can you get away with calling a judged "crooked" just because a case has gone against you?
Blimey! Not sure what to think about their criticism of Judge Pearce. Do his past actions suggest that he might disregard a strong case in a way that we get the wrong decision? If so, I guess the key question is who has the strongest case; Elliott or Panorame? Maybe he will sit on the fence and defer to someone else to make the decision at a future stage of the court process. So many questions........
I really wouldn't worry about it. To summarise, the bloke criticising the judge did a U-turn on a motorway slip road, and got caught doing it by the police. The police began a prosecution, but didn't see it through, because there was uncertainty about whether or not the bloke turned before the point on the slip road at which the motorway regulations kicked in. Despite nothing coming of the prosecution, he complained to Cheshire Constabulary, the Independent Office of Police Conduct, his Police and Crime Commissioner and his MP. He also sued the police for malicious prosecution, and chose to represent himself (this was the case heard by Judge Pearce). When that went against him, he appealed, again representing himself. He lost the appeal. At some point, he created the website Cafc43v3r linked to, on which he labels everyone involved in the matter as either a criminal or a crook.
These people used to stand on the Strand ranting about these things
There are some very strange people out there in the world.
Can you get away with calling a judged "crooked" just because a case has gone against you?
Blimey! Not sure what to think about their criticism of Judge Pearce. Do his past actions suggest that he might disregard a strong case in a way that we get the wrong decision? If so, I guess the key question is who has the strongest case; Elliott or Panorame? Maybe he will sit on the fence and defer to someone else to make the decision at a future stage of the court process. So many questions........
I really wouldn't worry about it. To summarise, the bloke criticising the judge did a U-turn on a motorway slip road, and got caught doing it by the police. The police began a prosecution, but didn't see it through, because there was uncertainty about whether or not the bloke turned before the point on the slip road at which the motorway regulations kicked in. Despite nothing coming of the prosecution, he complained to Cheshire Constabulary, the Independent Office of Police Conduct, his Police and Crime Commissioner and his MP. He also sued the police for malicious prosecution, and chose to represent himself (this was the case heard by Judge Pearce). When that went against him, he appealed, again representing himself. He lost the appeal. At some point, he created the website Cafc43v3r linked to, on which he labels everyone involved in the matter as either a criminal or a crook.
You’d think you would just leave it after the initial case against you was dropped.
Comments
We have seen an example of this being questioned in the last week or so.......
https://www.clarkewillmott.com/news/email-signatures/
Can you get away with calling a judged "crooked" just because a case has gone against you?
Guess justice doesn't take bank holidays!
I really wouldn't worry about it. To summarise, the bloke criticising the judge did a U-turn on a motorway slip road, and got caught doing it by the police. The police began a prosecution, but didn't see it through, because there was uncertainty about whether or not the bloke turned before the point on the slip road at which the motorway regulations kicked in. Despite nothing coming of the prosecution, he complained to Cheshire Constabulary, the Independent Office of Police Conduct, his Police and Crime Commissioner and his MP. He also sued the police for malicious prosecution, and chose to represent himself (this was the case heard by Judge Pearce). When that went against him, he appealed, again representing himself. He lost the appeal. At some point, he created the website Cafc43v3r linked to, on which he labels everyone involved in the matter as either a criminal or a crook.
Prices are for information only!!