Chaisty says there’s no evidence that the club is under any sanctions due to the actions of his client. The embargoes were in place well before my client “came onto the scene”.
#cafc
Chaisty says there’s no evidence that the club is under any sanctions due to the actions of his client. The embargoes were in place well before my client “came onto the scene”.
#cafc
Mihail evidence says EFL disciplinary proceedings include Elliott's action, Chaisty says no evidence for that. Embargoes in place before Elliott appeared. Hard embargo in place since April.
LJ Lewison says that Judge Pearce's ruling may be based on the wrong hypothesis. Chaisty says that MM assumed that Elliott's disqualification is final ruling, which is false.
Don’t like this LJ seemingly agreeing with Chaisty
Yeah......I thought the while point was that Judges were impartial. But then again, all part of the old boys club.
No evidence put forward that EFL embargo will change if the injunction refused, says Chaisty. Mihail suggests club will be expelled if Elliott owns club but cannot be a relevant person under EFL rules. Chaisty says this ignores commercial position for LD.
Only statement re third party is that Nimer remains committed to finding a buyer. Court unable to find evidence from Mihail that ESI would suffer any harm from injunction, says Chaisty.
“No evidence put forward that EFL embargo will change if the injunction refused, says Chaisty. Mihail suggests club will be expelled if Elliott owns club but cannot be a relevant person under EFL rules. Chaisty says this ignores commercial position for LD.“
wasn’t the evidence of an imminent sale the reason we had to have the short term injunction in place? And now there’s no evidence that things will change - when a sale taking place would stop the embargo. Slimy flip flopping fucker.
Chaisty says there’s no evidence that the club is under any sanctions due to the actions of his client. The embargoes were in place well before my client “came onto the scene”.
#cafc
Au contraire Mr Chastity neither has your client managed to get the sanction lifted 😈.
Comments
wasn’t the evidence of an imminent sale the reason we had to have the short term injunction in place? And now there’s no evidence that things will change - when a sale taking place would stop the embargo. Slimy flip flopping fucker.