Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
No photo of an F5 button yet - I’m disappointed0
-
WowSoundAsa£ said:Almost 2,000 on line, which includes around 675 guests0 -
They prob see my Babestation comment mateAddickted said:People still joining with their cameras on.3 -
COME ON YOU REEEEDDSSSS0
-
Lets keep the updates real now.0
-
I can’t stop laughing following this stuff. They should do a sketch show of these court appearancessiblers said:Some fella lying in his bed with his camera on, this is very surreal6 -
Not a good start here. Nimer barely given any evidence and appears to have used Marian Mihail as his lawyer...0
-
Fuck me this is torture!!0
-
Just seen Sue with a Hostess trolley.18
-
Disallowed for off side. Blatant goal, the defence stepped forward except Elliot who played on our barrister who smaked it into the roof of the netHorsfield9 said:Have we scored yet ?0 -
Sponsored links:
-
“Is that all u take away”0
-
Don't start @KBslittlesis off FFS 😉flyingkiwiDK said:SISS2 -
Sue AT THE hostess trolleyAddickted said:Just seen Sue with a Hostess trolley.1 -
Token statement from Nimer, adopting Mihail’s statement. Chaisty says Mihail’s statement contains irrelevancies, errors and comments. Claims he fails to engage on real issues.
1 -
Chaisty saying Mihail has failed to engage in an issues raised by Lex Dominus - including the "considerable amount" of money Paul Elliott has put in and that failure of Nimer to put any money in.
0 -
Sod this, I'm taking the dog for a walk.
Will catch the 10 seconds highlights on Quest later9 -
Literally in tears here!AFKABartram said:
I can’t stop laughing following this stuff. They should do a sketch show of these court appearancessiblers said:Some fella lying in his bed with his camera on, this is very surreal2 -
FantasticForeverAddickted said:Token statement from Nimer, adopting Mihail’s statement. Chaisty says Mihail’s statement contains irrelevancies, errors and comments. Claims he fails to engage on real issues.0 -
Chaisty: "He provides no evidence at all that granting this injunction will cause any harm. His evidence is entirely woeful when you take away his speculation."
0 -
So first off, Nimer is a lazy slob...0
-
Sponsored links:
-
Elliotts QC is just fishing!
1 -
Elliott's Lawyer concentrating on mistruths in Mihails statement.
Nimer failed to put any finance into the club. Elliott did in June0 -
FYI, these comments in italics are all tweets from both Airman and Cawley9
-
Come on you reds!0
-
What like climate change and poverty etc? Clever diversion tac tics in play, but oldest legal trick in the book.ForeverAddickted said:Token statement from Nimer, adopting Mihail’s statement. Chaisty says Mihail’s statement contains irrelevancies, errors and comments. Claims he fails to engage on real issues.4 -
So... Thats Elliott's fault for putting money into the club when he didnt own it!!carly burn said:Elliott's Lawyer concentrating on mistruths in Mihails statement.
Nimer failed to put any finance into the club. Elliott did in June7 -
Elliott understands the need for a swift resolution0
-
Don’t remember crown court being like this.

4 -
6
This discussion has been closed.


















