Bet if that was done for Championship clubs there would be alot more with minus figures, shows the difference that clubs are working with, wasn't it Roland when selling us that said it was easier to sell a league one club, because in the championship you always lose money or words to that effect
Bet if that was done for Championship clubs there would be alot more with minus figures, shows the difference that clubs are working with, wasn't it Roland when selling us that said it was easier to sell a league one club, because in the championship you always lose money or words to that effect
Say what you like about Roland, but he knows his football.
Bet if that was done for Championship clubs there would be alot more with minus figures, shows the difference that clubs are working with, wasn't it Roland when selling us that said it was easier to sell a league one club, because in the championship you always lose money or words to that effect
Surely if you lose money then your net spend is larger. Sunderland and Hull are the only ones making a profit here, aren't they?
Bet if that was done for Championship clubs there would be alot more with minus figures, shows the difference that clubs are working with, wasn't it Roland when selling us that said it was easier to sell a league one club, because in the championship you always lose money or words to that effect
Championship clubs would generally have massive positive figures because they spend more than they receive. If they have received large transfer fees from Premiership clubs then their figure would go negative.
That's how I interpret it, or rather it's not a question of interpretation, but correct definition of language.
It says net SPEND. Therefore a positive amount is a bad thing, surely. ?
It is impossible to say wether a spend is good or bad without considering what the spend is on. At best, all this tells us is the amount of money going in or out without looking at the goods and services that have flowed in the other direction. Spending wisely on improved infrastructure and careful building of a winning team would surely be a good thing. Spaffing money up the wall on agents, consultants, Range Rovers, river views, court cases, failed vanity experiments and nonsense like under-pitch pipes without heating is bad. Let's consider the other side of the story before getting carried away one way or another on meaningless numbers.
Comments
Sunderland at minus £62M
Hull at minus £13M
Bet if that was done for Championship clubs there would be alot more with minus figures, shows the difference that clubs are working with, wasn't it Roland when selling us that said it was easier to sell a league one club, because in the championship you always lose money or words to that effect
?
That's how I interpret it, or rather it's not a question of interpretation, but correct definition of language.
I'm in SE9 too - Gissa cuddle!