Nottingham had been one of the worst areas for positive cases in October. At one point thay had 10 times the amount of positive cases per 100,000 than Bromley or Sevenoaks.
Nottingham had been one of the worst areas for positive cases in October. At one point thay had 10 times the amount of positive cases per 100,000 than Bromley or Sevenoaks.
great fact but Burton is in Staffs which doesn't even border Notts
I might be wrong here because I can’t be bothered to check the facts but I think Grimsby called a game off because two players tested positive! Unless they had another 10 isolating, that number seems low
What are the rules rules about self-isolating if tested negative at the same time an associate is tested negative? To my mind, anyone in this situation should have to wait a certain period before having a retest. This to ensure that they aren't just a bit behind on the same curve. That may not be the law or part of the FA/FL rules, though.
EFL are happy that protocols have been met from Burton which is impressive as they're rooted to the bottom of the table so could have used the excuse to get the Hull and Charlton games moved to a better time for them
Comments
Last thing we need is a fixture pile up.
This will happen all winter, we were lucky(?) that when Chuks tested positive it hadn't spread across the squad and management
the Doncaster ladies manager took charge of their cup game as their coaching staff were isolating.
Otherwise what's the quota of players called up to an international game for a game be postponed. Could it be the same as that?
EFL are happy that protocols have been met from Burton which is impressive as they're rooted to the bottom of the table so could have used the excuse to get the Hull and Charlton games moved to a better time for them
Good news for Hull, their game goes ahead, and against a side missing TWELVE players. Not sure how that maintains the integrity of the league?