Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Swindon v Charlton (closes Monday lunch time)

your marks please: 

Amos: 
Gunter: 
Pratley: 
Pearce: 
Maatsen: 
Watson: 
Gilbey: 
Maddison: 
Forster-Caskey: 
Bogle: 
Washington: 
Aneke: 
Referee: 

Purrington: n/a
Matthews: n/a
«13

Comments

  • Amos: 6
    Gunter: 5.5
    Pratley: 5.5
    Pearce: 5.5
    Maatsen: 6
    Watson: 5
    Gilbey: 5
    Maddison: 5
    Forster-Caskey: 5
    Bogle: 5
    Washington: 6
    Aneke: 6
    Referee: 6

  • Amos: 6 could have come for that last corner? Idk
    Gunter: 6 decent 
    Pratley: 7 played mostly well
    Pearce: 6 lacked some composure 
    Maatsen: 7 played well mostly 
    Watson: 8.5 our best player today
    Gilbey: 5 one lucky through-ball and a load of rubbish
    Maddison: 6.5 some inspired touches, ridiculous substitution 
    Forster-Caskey: 5.5 not his game today
    Bogle: 6.5 our biggest goal threat today
    Washington: 6 so much effort, but little execution 
    Aneke: 6.5 scored and held it up but was expected to do it on his own 
    Referee: 6 idk

    Purrington: n/a some nice passes
    Matthews: n/a ridiculous that he came on
  • Amos: 6.5
    Gunter: 6
    Pratley: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Maatsen: 6
    Watson: 6
    Gilbey: 5 
    Maddison: 6
    Forster-Caskey: 5
    Coco the Clown: 5
    Washington: 6
    Aneke: 6
    Referee: 5
  • Amos: 6.5
    Gunter: 6
    Pratley: 6.5
    Pearce: 6.5
    Maatsen: 7
    Watson: 7 MOM
    Gilbey: 5.5
    Maddison: 6.5
    Forster-Caskey: 6
    Bogle: 6
    Washington: 6
    Aneke: 6
    Referee: 6

    Purrington: n/a
    Matthews: n/a
  • your marks please: 

    Amos: 8 claimed everything but looked like he could have done better for their second
    Gunter: 7 fine
    Pratley: 7 best game at cb for a while
    Pearce: 7.5 warrior
    Maatsen: 6.5 seemed like he struggled first half
    Watson: 8 one of his best games for us
    Gilbey: 5.5 some flashes of what he can do but also sloppy final ball
    Maddison: 7 wouldn’t have brought him off, he looked our best prospect going forward
    Forster-Caskey: 6 not as good as last week
    Bogle: 6 earned us one point cost us two
    Washington: 6 tried hard but too many cock ups on the final ball (bar the assist)
    Aneke: 7 changes the game when he comes on, why can’t he play more than 45’
    Referee: 8 motm

    Bowyer: 2, shocking subs

    Purrington: n/a
    Matthews: n/a

  • Amos: 6.5
    Gunter: 6.5
    Pratley: 7
    Pearce:  6.5
    Maatsen: 6.5
    Watson: 7.5
    Gilbey: 6.5
    Maddison: 6.5
    Forster-Caskey: 6.5
    Bogle: 6.5
    Washington: 6.5
    Aneke: 6.5
    Referee: 6
  • Amos: 6.5- Did OK claiming crosses but last minute goal has a question mark against him  
    Gunter: 7 -Fairly solid
    Pratley: 7.5 - Good game
    Pearce: 7.5 - Solid
    Maatsen: 6.5 - Some good play but did have trouble with Odumayo 
    Watson: 8 - Always involved
    Gilbey: 5 - Sorry, don't get him
    Maddison: 6 - Struggled to get involved
    Forster-Caskey: 6.5 - Too slow!
    Bogle: 5 - One extra point for the goal
    Washington: 6.5 - Ran all day and an assist but could have done better on occasion
    Aneke: 7 - Always a handful 
    Referee: 8 - Thought he did well
  • Amos:  6.5
    Gunter: 6
    Pratley: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Maatsen: 7
    Watson: 8
    Gilbey: 5.5
    Maddison: 6
    Forster-Caskey: 6
    Bogle: 5
    Washington: 6
    Aneke: 8.5
    Referee: 6

    Purrington: n/a
    Matthews: n/a
  • Amos: 7
    Pratley: 7
    Pearce:  6.5
    Maatsen: 6.5
    Watson: 7.5
    Gilbey: 6
    Maddison: 6
    Forster-Caskey: 6
    Bogle: 6
    Washington: 6
    Aneke: 6.5
    Referee: 7

  • Amos: 6 - Should have save that last effort from Pitman!
    Gunter: 7 - Not too bad.
    Pratley: 7 - As above.
    Pearce: 7 - Ditto
    Maatsen: 7 - Only one with any pace.
    Watson: 7 - Not too many bad passes.
    Gilbey: 5 - Should have been subbed along with Washington.
    Maddison: 6 - Didn't do anything worthwhile.
    Forster-Caskey: 6- As above and poor corners.
    Bogle: 5 - For the goal but what a miss.
    Washington: 4 - Hope u don't read this but today you were piss poor!
    Aneke: 7 - Should have played the whole game.
    Referee: 6 - OK.

    Purrington: Not our worst sub 
    Matthews: Why bring him on when you have JW on the bench.
    Would just like to add Valley Pass was very poor losing the sound and hardly any volume, hope they are going to give us all a credit for the next game!
  • Sponsored links:


  • Amos: 6 covered most things well
    Gunter: 6
    Pratley: 5
    Pearce: 6
    Maatsen: 7
    Watson: 7 MOM agreed
    Gilbey: 5
    Maddison: 5 needs to get stuck in more
    Forster-Caskey: 5 poor final ball
    Bogle: 6
    Washington: 5 wasted great chances
    Aneke: 6
    Referee: 6

    Purrington: n/a
    Matthews: n/a
  • your marks please: 

    Amos: 
    Gunter: 
    Pratley: 
    Pearce: 
    Maatsen: 
    Watson: 
    Gilbey: 
    Maddison: 
    Forster-Caskey: 
    Bogle: 
    Washington: 
    Aneke: 
    Referee: 

    Purrington: n/a
    Matthews: n/a
    Amos: 7.5 quiet day, claimed most crossed except at the end
    Gunter: 6.5 ok
    Pratley: 7 did well
    Pearce:  7 did well
    Maatsen: 6.5 seen better
    Watson: 8 good game
    Gilbey: 6 still not at it
    Maddison: 6 struggled to get involved 
    Forster-Caskey: 6 so slow at decision making
    Bogle: 6.5 hilarious goal, terrible miss
    Washington: 6 not at it
    Aneke: 7 super sub
    Referee: 8 every week please
  • edited December 2020
    Amos: 6.5 came and cleaned up most stufff not sure about their winner though
    Gunter: 6 better than average
    Pratley: 7.5 very solid best defender 
    Pearce: 6 mostly solid seemed closest to Pitman when he headed the equaliser
    Maatsen: 7 got done for the 1st goal but acquited himself well overall
    Watson: 6.5 put a decent shift in
    Gilbey: 5 poor, lucky not to get the hook with JFK
    Maddison: 5.5 not up to last week's 2nd half showing
    Forster-Caskey: 5 not at the races, end product sadly lacking
    Bogle: 5.5 extra point for the goal
    Washington: 6 lots of effort but little end product apart from assist for Chuks
    Aneke: 6.5 Offered more than Bogle which was not hard and also scored
    Referee: 6
  • edited December 2020
    Amos: 7
    Gunter: 6
    Pratley: 7
    Pearce: 6.5
    Maatsen:  6.5
    Watson: 7
    Gilbey:  3 Crap again for pretty much whole game but no doubt he will start on boxing day leaving Williams on the bench again
    Maddison: 5
    Forster-Caskey:5.5 
    Bogle: 5.5
    Washington:6 
    Aneke: 7 Prob would have scored a hatrick if we would have actually attacked in the last 25 minutes.

  • Amos: 5.5
    Gunter: 5
    Pratley: 6.5
    Pearce: 6
    Maatsen: 5.5
    Watson: 5.5
    Gilbey: 4.5
    Maddison: 5
    Forster-Caskey: 4.5
    Bogle: 5
    Washington: 5
    Aneke: 5.5
    Referee: 7
  • Amos: 6.5
    Gunter: 6
    Pratley: 6.5
    Pearce: 6.5
    Maatsen: 6
    Watson: 7
    Gilbey: 5
    Maddison: 5.5
    Forster-Caskey: 5.5
    Bogle: 5.5
    Washington: 6
    Aneke: 6.5
    Referee: 6
  • Amos: 6 - Commanding but didnt like his approach to punching today
    Gunter: 7 - Pretty solid throughout, didnt get to attack as much
    Pratley: 7 - Absolutely everywhere as always, just in defence instead of midfield
    Pearce: 7 - Didnt really do much wrong today
    Maatsen: 6.5 - Good at getting forward at times, maybe dived in too early for the first goal
    Watson: 7 (MOTM) - Solid performance
    Gilbey: 5 - Too many over hit passes despite his pre-assist
    Maddison: 6 - Struggled to get involved
    Forster-Caskey: 6 - Struggled to get involved
    Bogle: 5 - Loses a mark for that miss
    Washington: 6 - Had nothing to work with, showed his team work by passing to Aneke

    Aneke: 7 - Typical performance from him
    Purrington: 6 - Had an OK game, improved since Blackpool

    Referee: 6 - Not the worst we've had this season
  • Amos: 6.5
    Gunter: 6
    Pratley: 7
    Pearce: 6
    Maatsen: 6.5
    Watson: 7.5
    Gilbey: 5
    Maddison: 5.5
    Forster-Caskey: 4.5
    Bogle: 4.5
    Washington: 4.5
    Aneke: 6.5

    BOWYER 2 Get a fucking grip man

  • Amos: 8 
    Gunter: 7
    Pratley: 6
    Pearce: 7
    Maatsen: 7
    Watson: 7
    Gilbey: 4
    Maddison: 6
    Forster-Caskey: 5
    Bogle: 6
    Washington: 6
    Aneke: 7
    Referee:8 thought he was very good  

  • This is becoming increasingly depressing!

    Amos: 7
    Gunter: 5.5
    Pratley: 7.5 MOM
    Pearce: 7
    Maatsen: 5.5 (should have been a straight swap for Purrington)
    Watson: 7
    Gilbey: 4.5 - still waiting for him to kick on, better in the 2nd half but poor in the first
    Maddison: 6.5
    Forster-Caskey: 5.5 - He is a player that reflect the game around him
    Bogle: 4.5 I really try to be positive but I can't be anymore
    Washington: 5 Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
    Aneke: 6 needed support but shooting was tame
    Referee: 5

    Purrington: handled the winger better than Maatsen did
    Matthews: I don't think he even knew where he was meant to play
  • Sponsored links:


  • Amos:  7.0
    Gunter: 7.0
    Pratley: 7.5
    Pearce: 7.0
    Maatsen: 6.5
    Watson: 7.0
    Gilbey: 5.0
    Maddison: 6.0 
    Forster-Caskey: 6.5
    Bogle: 6.5
    Washington: 6.5
    Aneke: 6.5
    Referee:  7.0

    Purrington: n/a
    Matthews: n/a

    Bowyer  3.0 inept tactical substitutions.
  • Posted after watching and now with the hump after another late goal conceded & when we should have scored 4

    Amos: 6.5 - Couldn't do too much about the goals - some decent punches and catches
    Gunter: 6 - Rarely got forward but defended ok
    Pratley: 6 - Doing all he can at CH
    Pearce: 5 - Not the commanding CH he used to be. 
    Maatsen: 3 - Got done by his winger all game, slipped for their 1st and not the attacking threat he was
    Watson: 7 - Done his job, winning tackles and making simple passes
    Gilbey: 3 - Struggling to fit in - terrible pass when we had a 4 on 2 at 2-1 when his cross didn't beat the defender. 
    Maddison: 5.5 - Defo has the ability but didn't get into the game enough. Doesn't help when our players don't seem to want to pass to him. Surely he should be taking free kicks and corners
    Forster-Caskey: 3 - Another who struggled to do anything with the ball.
    Bogle: 4 - Should have scored a second. Got caught offside a lot and can't win a header.
    Washington: 4.5 - Works his socks off but didn't look a threat throughout.
    Aneke: 7 - Won headers, linked up play & was in the right place for a tap in
    Referee: 7 - Let the game flow and wasn't card happy
  • Amos: 7
    Gunter: 7
    Pratley: 7
    Pearce: 7
    Maatsen: 7
    Watson: 7.5
    Gilbey: 5
    Maddison: 5.5
    Forster-Caskey: 5.5
    Bogle: 5
    Washington: 5.5
    Aneke: 7
    Referee: 7
  • Amos: 7 nothing could be done about either.
    Gunter: 5 Average. What's happened?
    Pratley: 7 Good
    Pearce: 6.5 Good, but faded.
    Maatsen: 6 still not sure if I rate him
    Watson: 7 good.
    Gilbey: 4 not good enough
    Maddison: 7 his vision is class, his ability is decent his pace is lacking as is his physical strength but as soon as he went off I knew we'd throw at least 2 pts.
    Forster-Caskey: 7.5 tired badly but played well.
    Bogle: 6.5 not nearly as bad as some suggest, not nearly as good as one suggests either.
    Washington: 6.5 Works so hard for the team.
    Aneke: 7 Came on, scored, was a pain for the opposition... Needs to learn to pass as his short passing is woeful.
    Referee: 7 no issues, his lino 2nd half gets a 3

    Purrington: n/a 6
    Matthews: n/a 6

    Bowyer 4. For 10 mins in the first half we looked really decent, we replicated this for 20 mins of the second half and then we took off two decent passers for... Two full backs...
  • Amos: 6 
    Gunter: 6.5 
    Pratley: 6.5
    Pearce: 6.5 
    Maatsen: 6.5 
    Watson: 7
    Gilbey: 6
    Maddison: 6 substitution 
    Forster-Caskey: 5.5 
    Bogle: 6 
    Washington: 6  
    Aneke: 6.5 
    Bowyer 2
  • Amos: 7
    Gunter: 7
    Pratley: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Maatsen: 6.5
    Watson: 7.5
    Gilbey: 5
    Maddison: 6
    Forster-Caskey: 6
    Bogle: 4
    Washington: 6
    Aneke: 6
    Referee: 8 MOM
  • Amos:  7
    Gunter: 7
    Pratley: 7
    Pearce: 7.0
    Maatsen: 6.5
    Watson: 7.5
    Gilbey: 6
    Maddison: 6.5
    Forster-Caskey: 6.5
    Bogle: 7
    Washington: 6.5
    Aneke: 6.5
    Referee:  7.0

    Purrington: n/a
    Matthews: n/a
  • Amos: 6.5 did well claiming crosses all game-till the goal. 
    Gunter: 5.5 think he was pretty poor, if he really is our highest paid player as rumours have suggested, I think we’ve been had. 
    Pratley: 6 few good challenges and cut outs, but just not good enough at CB, understandably.
    Pearce: 4.5 don’t think he’s good enough at this level anymore. 
    Maatsen: 6 bit of a mixed bag, he plays well when the team plays well but pretty average otherwise. 
    Watson: 5.5 marking him down as I feel he was partially at fault for the first, seems like he often gets bypassed in defence due to his pace.  
    Gilbey: 4 maybe we’re just not using him in the correct role but from what I’ve seen I’ve got no idea how he makes any impact on a game. 
    Maddison: 6.5 another positive performance, think we missed him as an outlet when he went off. 
    Forster-Caskey: 5 slow and ineffective.  
    Bogle: 5.5 I’ll give him some credit for the goal, but generally poor and an awful miss not long after. 
    Washington: 6 not bad, not great. 
    Aneke: 7 not his best game but still scored and made a good impact. 
    Referee: 3 poor for both sides. 
  • Amos: 5
    Gunter: 6
    Pratley: 6
    Pearce: 6
    Maatsen: 6
    Watson: 6.5
    Gilbey: 4.5
    Maddison: 5.5
    Forster-Caskey: 4.5
    Bogle: 6
    Washington: 5
    Aneke: 6.5
    Referee: 7
  • Amos:  7 
    Gunter:  7
    Pratley:  7
    Pearce:  7
    Maatsen:   7
    Watson:  7
    Gilbey:   7
    Maddison: 6
    Forster-Caskey: 6
    Bogle: 4
    Washington: 5
    Aneke: 7
    Referee: 7

Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!