Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sandgaard on TalkSport today [16/3/21]

2

Comments

  • Talksport......producing polyfilla since 1995. 

    Thomas interview was nothing new from yesterday. 
  • edited March 2021
    It’s certainly saved TS the awkward decision of stick or twist at the end of the season. 
  • Looks like Birmingham came knocking, Lee showed a bit of interest and Thomas agreed he could go pretty swiftly.  
  • TS is clearly a long-term thinker (OK, a "100 year plan" sounds a bit OTT, but I think that's just his way of emphasising that). It certainly sounds like the new manager is lined up, so there must have been talks going on prior to this week. That makes me optimistic that we're going to be happy with the calibre of the new guy.
    Most of Jordan's points are invalidated by the fact that it seems that LB's contract didn't have a compensation clause (which is down to Mouthall). Why would he leave: he's now on a two-and-a-half year contract and whatever the rumours about what we were paying him, you can be pretty sure he's on more money.
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Jordan obviously unaware that ESI sorted Bowyer's contract. Not Sandgaard. 

    I remember when Jordan was saying, Sandgaard needs to run the club as he wants to. 

    Also seems unaware Sandgaard has stated he will be getting a new manager in soon. 

    I wonder if TalkShite cut those interviews to make things seem more dramatic than they are. I like how calm Sandgaard was on there. 
    Surely new contracts were offered when Thomas took over, I doubt anyone working at the club has a valid ESI contract of employment.
    No. It could have been TUPE'd if the Employer had changed, however this is not relevant where the Employer remains the same. 

    As Charlton Athletic Football Company Liimited was transferred from ESI ownership to Sandgaard Capital ownership the Employing organisation has not changed. The owner of the organisation has. 

    If ownership was transferred from Charlton Athletic Football Company Limited to another employer say Charlton Pathetic Football Company Limited, then contracts would be subject to TUPE.

    I know football contracts are quite different to a regular contract so the aboe may not apply. 
  • As ppl have already mentioned it was a case of results being poor since xmas really, which Simon and White didnt touch upon. 

    TS wants to get out of this league ASAP and if the results continued to be poor he would have ended up sacking LB, either at the end of the season or the beginning of next if the poor form continued. Along with the form were the constant digging out of players in public, and he generally just seemed burnt out and dishevelled from the drama of the last year or so. LB saved TS the stress in resigning. 
  • Jim trying to make a story that we will miss Bowyer and it is a massive spanner in our rebuilding plans. 
    Prick
  • Sponsored links:


  • Dazzler21 said:
    Jordan obviously unaware that ESI sorted Bowyer's contract. Not Sandgaard. 

    I remember when Jordan was saying, Sandgaard needs to run the club as he wants to. 

    Also seems unaware Sandgaard has stated he will be getting a new manager in soon. 

    I wonder if TalkShite cut those interviews to make things seem more dramatic than they are. I like how calm Sandgaard was on there. 
    Surely new contracts were offered when Thomas took over, I doubt anyone working at the club has a valid ESI contract of employment.
    That makes no sense at all. Of course they weren't. They weren't contracted to ESI they are contracted to Charlton. 
  • most new owners always want to bring in their own appointed manager eventually
  • Getting rid of Bowyer would have been a divisive move by Sandgaard and he knows it - this has saved him that aggravation, and potentially a bit of money too.

    As to whether he's been actively looking for a replacement (or had Roddy doing so) I am not sure but I would be very surprised if he hadn't at least been starting to look at what is out there.
  • MattF said:
    Obviously Simon Jordan doesn't watch too many Charlton games then
    You do surprise me! ;)
  • Could anyone post a link if it's not too much trouble please?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Do you think that Sandgaard was preparing for life without Bowyer, either now or in a couple of months time? It would explain why he seems pretty chilled about it all and is confident we’ll have a new manager in before the week is out. 
  • se9addick said:
    Do you think that Sandgaard was preparing for life without Bowyer, either now or in a couple of months time? It would explain why he seems pretty chilled about it all and is confident we’ll have a new manager in before the week is out. 
    TS seems like the kind of person who would at least account for the possibility, you don't get success by not anticipating such things.

    He seems to have been genuine in giving Bowyer the chance to reach play offs but I would be very surprised if he wasn't at the very least monitoring some options even if he was not actively planning anything.
  • edited March 2021
    Dazzler21 said:
    Dazzler21 said:
    Jordan obviously unaware that ESI sorted Bowyer's contract. Not Sandgaard. 

    I remember when Jordan was saying, Sandgaard needs to run the club as he wants to. 

    Also seems unaware Sandgaard has stated he will be getting a new manager in soon. 

    I wonder if TalkShite cut those interviews to make things seem more dramatic than they are. I like how calm Sandgaard was on there. 
    Surely new contracts were offered when Thomas took over, I doubt anyone working at the club has a valid ESI contract of employment.
    No. It could have been TUPE'd if the Employer had changed, however this is not relevant where the Employer remains the same. 

    As Charlton Athletic Football Company Liimited was transferred from ESI ownership to Sandgaard Capital ownership the Employing organisation has not changed. The owner of the organisation has. 

    If ownership was transferred from Charlton Athletic Football Company Limited to another employer say Charlton Pathetic Football Company Limited, then contracts would be subject to TUPE.

    I know football contracts are quite different to a regular contract so the aboe may not apply. 
    I imagine that's why Tone is still at the club. Difficult to get rid of straight away as he has a contract. TS probably biding his time until it's up or 'restructuring' to get rid of his job. I hope so anyway.

    Non-football staff aren't generally employed on fixed term contracts. Keohane has been there about six years so would have accrued employment rights anyway, but I don't think he's still there for (club) financial reasons. If TS appointed a chief executive he could restructure him out.
  • edited March 2021
    I have a feeling Thomas has known for a few weeks if not more, so they have a had a head start in the Manager recruitment, hence his bullish response  
  • There is always the option that they have both been aware a while:

    Maybe Bowyer told Sandgaard he was to be looking for a job come the end of the season?

    Maybe Sandgaard told Bowyer he can start looking for a new job as he'd be replaced come the end of the season.

    More speculation obviously. 
  • They are clearly are not up to speed on all things C.A.F.C, I don't expect them to be, its just another story to catch listeners and sell advertising. I don't think the story even made the BBC sports pages, if it did it wasn't up long. As for the departure of Bowyer, I think everyone thinks its probably for the best and we can all agree on that.
  • it may just be my impression but since LB became our manager we have been in the media quite a lot considering our lowly league status. If TS brings someone in who is more low profile it will be interesting to see if media coverage remains 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!