Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK: Charlton 2-0 Plymouth

lancashire lad
lancashire lad Posts: 15,655
in General Charlton
many thanks to the102 Lifers who gave marks, I enjoyed that :)







Comments

  • Jonniesta
    Jonniesta Posts: 1,163
    Well done Lancs, as always. Great set of scores befitting a great performance, and harsh to pick out a MOTM, so glad it's someone who has been such a key part of the turnaround. Well earned first MOTM for him, though Lee surely will get one soon. 
  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 15,851
    37% possession, worse pass completion rate, 100% goals.  There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.
  • fat man on a moped
    fat man on a moped Posts: 938
    @lancashire lad Lavelle listed twice in the Discipline section? 
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,655
    fat man on a moped said:
    @lancashire lad Lavelle listed twice in the Discipline section? 
    thanks I'll correct my original
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,035
    The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.

    The same could arguably said about Davison too
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,298
    killerandflash said:
    The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.

    The same could arguably said about Davison too
    Really the ref was good and when you compare him to the ones in last two games brilliant. 
    Davison deserves a decent mark because of the work rate he put in. Defending from the front!
  • Cloudworm
    Cloudworm Posts: 977
    killerandflash said:
    The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.

    The same could arguably said about Davison too
    Usually the case with the ref (aside from last week). Davison would have been MOTM in 6 other league games with that score!
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,402
    I thought Purrington had a good game but not an 8.63 game myself, got a lot of emotional post-game 10s because he scored 
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,402
    But I guess that's the winning against a good team bonus. Marks get inflated. Gilbey 8.31 - yeah he made some decent forward runs but...I'm being very churlish here though. Enjoy the moment yadda yadda. But the Statbank must give a FAIR REFLECTION ;) 
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,460
    Leuth said:
    But I guess that's the winning against a good team bonus. Marks get inflated. Gilbey 8.31 - yeah he made some decent forward runs but...I'm being very churlish here though. Enjoy the moment yadda yadda. But the Statbank must give a FAIR REFLECTION ;) 
    It gives a reflection based on all posters so it's as fair as you're gonna get.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,976
    Leuth said:
    But I guess that's the winning against a good team bonus. Marks get inflated. Gilbey 8.31 - yeah he made some decent forward runs but...I'm being very churlish here though. Enjoy the moment yadda yadda. But the Statbank must give a FAIR REFLECTION ;) 
    Yeah, but many posters mark players based on the emotion they feel, rather than the actual performance of the players they've watched.
    It's ever been thus.

    Lancs has often said that he reckons it averages out over a season.
    Anyway, as many have commented before, it's just opinions.




  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,402
    I know, I know. I guess this is payback for those who put in excellent performances when we lose or draw (it does happen)

    I reckon a lot of Purrington bonus marks come because people think he isn't a striker so when he scores it's like an amazing wondrous miracle or something. When will they realise he IS a striker ffs
  • king addick
    king addick Posts: 3,739
    Leuth said:
    I thought Purrington had a good game but not an 8.63 game myself, got a lot of emotional post-game 10s because he scored 
    He didnt do much, if anything wrong in the game overall I thought. 

    Agree 10s might be a bit much but that overall rating seems fair as it was best game for us by a long stretch. 
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,035
    Cloudworm said:
    killerandflash said:
    The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.

    The same could arguably said about Davison too
    Usually the case with the ref (aside from last week). Davison would have been MOTM in 6 other league games with that score!
    The top ref scores have been for the Doncaster 4-0 win and the Plymouth 2-0 win...
  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 15,851
    Leuth said:
    But I guess that's the winning against a good team bonus. Marks get inflated. Gilbey 8.31 - yeah he made some decent forward runs but...I'm being very churlish here though. Enjoy the moment yadda yadda. But the Statbank must give a FAIR REFLECTION ;) 
    We beat the division leaders comfortably so it's reasonable to assume at least some of them, if not all of them, played well without doing anything amazing like scoring.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,790
    AddicksAddict said:
    37% possession, worse pass completion rate, 100% goals.  There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.
    A meaningless pass to the bloke next to you deep in your own half counts on stats but nowhere else. 
  • TEL
    TEL Posts: 10,100
    Like the studio commentators I think the possession stats are wrong....even Walsh said, Im not having that, was the statistician asleep half the game....I thought we had more of the ball first half and perhaps they shaded the second.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,035
    redman said:
    killerandflash said:
    The ref getting an over generous mark, based on the result and team performance.

    The same could arguably said about Davison too
    Really the ref was good and when you compare him to the ones in last two games brilliant. 
    Davison deserves a decent mark because of the work rate he put in. Defending from the front!
    Was Davison actually worse last night than on Saturday?

    His score will be well down though...

Categories

“Marketplace”