Craig MacGillivray MOM? He didn't need to make a meaningful save (apart from the goal which he had no chance) and hardly took a cross. Bizarre. (nothing to do with you LL, or is it?).
EDIT
Sorry Lancs, but it seems so bizarre that I checked MacG's figures. I make him 356/57 = 6.245 making him 4th or 5th.
Craig MacGillivray MOM? He didn't need to make a meaningful save (apart from the goal which he had no chance) and hardly took a cross. Bizarre. (nothing to do with you LL).
as for the goalie being MoM - over the years I have noticed that when there isn't a clear MoM and the goalie has not had a bad game he tends to become MoM by default - however I have no stats to prove that remark
as for the goalie being MoM - over the years I have noticed that when there isn't a clear MoM and the goalie has not had a bad game he tends to become MoM by default - however I have no stats to prove that remark
But have you checked his score? See my above post, edited before your above post?
I have no issues with McG getting mom, as it's more a reflection of the mediocrity of the team as a whole, especially the outfield players
Check the figures, I don't think we did mark him MOTM.
I have it as 363.5/57 = 6.37719...
When you counted 356, are you sure you didn't miss a mark?
The majority gave him a six mark so I took 57*6 = 342 and then added up any deviations from 6 in the marks that were given to add that to the final total.
Is there a reason the average for the players for the match is 6.04, whereas when you you look at it on the table that shows all the games it is 5.80? Never noticed before.
Out of interest, is the average a weighted average or just average of all the scores. By weighted I mean in terms of how long they are on the pitch.
Comments
He didn't need to make a meaningful save (apart from the goal which he had no chance) and hardly took a cross. Bizarre.
(nothing to do with you LL, or is it?).
EDIT
Sorry Lancs, but it seems so bizarre that I checked MacG's figures.
I make him 356/57 = 6.245 making him 4th or 5th.
Bizarre decision though I agree.
as for the goalie being MoM - over the years I have noticed that when there isn't a clear MoM and the goalie has not had a bad game he tends to become MoM by default - however I have no stats to prove that remark
See my above post, edited before your above post?
Callum: thanks for your double check on my figures
onward to MK Dons and let's hope for a more distinct MoM mark.
Out of interest, is the average a weighted average or just average of all the scores. By weighted I mean in terms of how long they are on the pitch.
no I don't weight the averages, that is one calculation too far