Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK: Charlton 0-1 Wycombe

lancashire lad
lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
edited January 2022 in General Charlton
many thanks to the 57 Lifers who gave marks, the Opposition mark is 5.68









Comments

  • Cloudworm
    Cloudworm Posts: 977
    Great stats. Thanks. Any chance of average scores for the season for each player, or is it too tricky?
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
    Cloudworm said:
    Great stats. Thanks. Any chance of average scores for the season for each player, or is it too tricky?
    the average for each player is there on the 2nd page of each table, for example MacG is 6.46 and for Innis 6.01
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,084
    edited January 2022
    Craig MacGillivray MOM?
    He didn't need to make a meaningful save (apart from the goal which he had no chance) and hardly took a cross. Bizarre.
    (nothing to do with you LL, or is it?).

    EDIT

    Sorry Lancs, but it seems so bizarre that I checked MacG's figures.
    I make him 356/57 = 6.245 making him 4th or 5th.
  • bolloxbolder
    bolloxbolder Posts: 7,986
    Covered End said:
    Craig MacGillivray MOM?
    He didn't need to make a meaningful save (apart from the goal which he had no chance) and hardly took a cross. Bizarre.
    (nothing to do with you LL).
    No not Craig but Conor apparently. Sorry Lancs:)

    Bizarre decision though I agree.
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
    BB - thanks I have corrected my mistake

    as for the goalie being MoM - over the years I have noticed that when there isn't a clear MoM and the goalie has not had a bad game he tends to become MoM by default - however I have no stats to prove that remark :)
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,084
    lancashire lad said:
    BB - thanks I have corrected my mistake

    as for the goalie being MoM - over the years I have noticed that when there isn't a clear MoM and the goalie has not had a bad game he tends to become MoM by default - however I have no stats to prove that remark :)
    But have you checked his score?
    See my above post, edited before your above post?
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,016
    I have no issues with McG getting mom, as it's more a reflection of the mediocrity of the team as a whole, especially the outfield players
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,084
    killerandflash said:
    I have no issues with McG getting mom, as it's more a reflection of the mediocrity of the team as a whole, especially the outfield players
    Check the figures, I don't think we did mark him MOTM.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,861
    edited January 2022
    Covered End said:
    killerandflash said:
    I have no issues with McG getting mom, as it's more a reflection of the mediocrity of the team as a whole, especially the outfield players
    Check the figures, I don't think we did mark him MOTM.

    I have it as 363.5/57 = 6.37719...

    When you counted 356, are you sure you didn't miss a mark?
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,861
    edited January 2022
    Callumcafc said:
    Covered End said:
    killerandflash said:
    I have no issues with McG getting mom, as it's more a reflection of the mediocrity of the team as a whole, especially the outfield players
    Check the figures, I don't think we did mark him MOTM.

    I have it as 363.5/57 = 6.37719...

    When you counted 356, are you sure you didn't miss a mark?

    The majority gave him a six mark so I took 57*6 = 342 and then added up any deviations from 6 in the marks that were given to add that to the final total.

    Leuth 6.5 (+0.5)
    AddicksAddict 7 (+1)
    Killarahales 7 (+1)
    newyorkaddick 7 (+1)
    SE7_EVEN 7 (+1)
    RonnieMoore 7 (+1)
    john3 6.5 (+0.5)
    redman 6.5 (+0.5)
    Bangkokaddick 6.5 (+0.5)
    Longtimeaddicted 8 (+2)
    Buglehorn 7 (+1)
    seth plum 7 (+1)
    JamesSeed 7 (+1)
    Addictedoldgit 7 (+1)
    93Addick 7 (+1)
    Hal1x 7 (+1)
    Viewfinder 5 (-1)
    801912601 7 (+1)
    Cloudworm 7.5 (+1.5)
    bromleyjohn 7 (+1)
    superdulvertonred 7 (+1)
    CafcWest 7 (+1)
    Simonsen 7 (+1)
    killerandflash 6.5 (+0.5)
    cafcsinger 6.5 (+0.5)

    0.5+1+1+1+1+1+0.5+0.5+0.5+2+1+1+1+1+1+1-1+1+1.5+1+1+1+1+0.5+0.5 = 21.5

    342+21.5 = 363.5


  • Sponsored links:



  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
    Covered End: I have checked my spreadsheet and MacG's mark is 6.37 as per the statbank

    Callum: thanks for your double check on my figures

    onward to MK Dons and let's hope for a more distinct MoM mark.
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,296
    Is there a reason the average for the players for the match is 6.04, whereas when you you look at it on the table that shows all the games it is 5.80? Never noticed before.

    Out of interest, is the average a weighted average or just average of all the scores. By weighted I mean in terms of how long they are on the pitch. 
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,651
    Redman  - well spotted, I missed out Davison's mark in the average, now corrected.

    no I don't weight the averages, that is one calculation too far
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,296
    fair enough LL. You do enough work! At least we know 
  • Cloudworm
    Cloudworm Posts: 977
    lancashire lad said:
    Cloudworm said:
    Great stats. Thanks. Any chance of average scores for the season for each player, or is it too tricky?
    the average for each player is there on the 2nd page of each table, for example MacG is 6.46 and for Innis 6.01
    Gotcha. Thanks. Interesting; Pearce top average score.
  • Sark99
    Sark99 Posts: 181
    Can I just ask was Dobson replaced by Inniss?
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 70,016
    Sark99 said:
    Can I just ask was Dobson replaced by Inniss?
    He was
  • Sark99
    Sark99 Posts: 181
    killerandflash said:
    Sark99 said:
    Can I just ask was Dobson replaced by Inniss?
    He was
    Does not show on the stats table, which needs updating. 

Categories

“Marketplace”