Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Players Marks: Charlton v Gillingham (closed early as have to work Thursday - sorry)
Comments
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 8
 Fraser: 6
 B-T: 7
 Stockley: 6
 Washington: 7
 Lee: 5
 Referee: 7
 0
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6.5
 Lavelle: 6.5
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser: 7
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 6
 Washington: 6.5
 Lee: 6
 Referee: 7.5
 Opposition: 5
 0
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6 a bit erratic tonight
 Lavelle: 7 attacked the ball well in second half
 Purrington: 7
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 6
 Fraser: 6.5 - I hope there is more to come
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 6 - looked knackered for last 20
 Washington: 6 - seemed determined to get a yellow card
 Lee: 4
 Referee: 6
 Opposition: 4 but it was only through a goalkeeping mistake that we managed to beat them.
 0
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6.5
 Lavelle: 6.5
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser: 6
 B-T: 7.5
 Stockley: 7
 Washington: 6
 Lee: 5
 Referee: 8
 Opposition: 5
 0
- 
            MacG: 6 hes clearly been told to come for yhings
 Clare: 6 not his best
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 6.5
 Matthews: 6.5 he was good today
 Gilbey: 7.5 if he could keep this up...
 Fraser: 7.5 clever footballer
 B-T: 7.5
 Stockley: 6
 Washington: 6.5 Duracell bunny
 Lee: 5
 Referee: 6 ref was ok but the east stand lino was terrible
 Opposition: 4 poor
 Pearce: n/a
 0
- 
            lancashire lad said:MacG: 6.5 nothing to do , kicking not great
 Clare: 6 good and bad
 Lavelle: 6 good second half
 Purrington: 6.5 best game for a while
 Dobson: 7 couple of mistakes
 Matthews: 6 didn't do a lot
 Gilbey: 7.5 much better
 Fraser: 7 has real quality
 B-T: 8 a revelation at left wing back
 Stockley: 6 faded badly
 Washington: 6 worked hard , but not much came off
 Lee: 3 oh dear
 Referee: 7
 Opposition: 4
 Pearce: n/a
 0
- 
            MacG: 6 He caught the ball twice.Clare: 5 Poorish.
 Lavelle: 6.5 Decent.
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 7 MOM.
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 6.5 Extra half for goal.
 Fraser: 6
 B-T: 6.5
 Stockley: 6.5
 Washington: 6
 Lee: 5 Gave the ball away too much.
 Referee: 7
 Opposition: 4 Relegation candidates.
 0
- 
            MacG: 6 - took a couple of crosses and not much else to do
 Clare: 6 - some poor distribution but reasonably sound and made one excellent tackle in the second half (he wasn't to know the guy was flagged offside)
 Lavelle: 6.5 - fairly solid against their big centre-forward
 Purrington: 6.5 - pretty decent in a position where he has sometimes struggled
 Dobson: 6.5 - displayed his usual endeavour and spread the play well on occasions, albeit he gave the ball away once or twice in dangerous areas in the second half
 Matthews: 6 - a tidy enough display
 Gilbey: 7 - got in some good positions but lacks composure and his first touch often let's him down
 Fraser: 6.5 - a very neat and tidy player, who can see a forward pass. Not fully fit yet but there is much more to come from him
 B-T: 8: MoTM - torched the opposition with his pace. Understandably faded in the second half but he still produced our best effort on goal and pulled back one excellent cross from the byeline. I hope he's fit for Saturday, as we have been largely starved of entertainment, especially recently
 Stockley: 5 - very rusty but an important contributor defensively on set plays
 Washington: 7 - his movement was first class and he did very well for a player just returning to the side
 Lee: 4 - he gave the ball away repeatedly when we had retreated towards the end, although did manage to waste a couple of minutes of injury time near the corner flag (albeit not with the panache of Tony Watt)
 Referee: 7 - good
 Opposition: 4 - a poor performance, especially in the light of their recent form. Harris cannot really believe that they were worth a point but I can understand him trying to keep his players' morale up for the run in.
 1
- 
            lancashire lad said:MacG: 6
 Clare: 6
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 6
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 8
 Fraser: 6
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 9
 Washington: 7
 Lee: 6
 Referee: 8 (ACS linesman 3)
 Opposition: 5
 Pearce: n/a
 2
- 
            MacG: 7 Good handling, and more commanding
 Clare: 7
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 7
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 7
 Gilbey: 7.5
 Fraser: 7
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 6.5
 Washington: 6.5
 Lee: 5
 Referee: 7
 Opposition: 3 Very passive performance when we were potentially there for the taking.0
- 
Sponsored links:
- 
            MacG: 5.5 came and caught the ball a couple of times never really made a save
 Clare: 6 Makes some strange decisions sometimes
 Lavelle: 7 was ok
 Purrington: 6.5 was ok
 Dobson: 6.5 bit under par but ok
 Matthews: 6.5 better than usual
 Gilbey: 7 scored and possibly could have had another one or two
 Fraser: 7 as stated elsewhere missed him when he went off
 B-T: 7.5 good first half tired a bit in the second
 Stockley: 5 below his best falls over to easy
 Washington: 5.5 a bit headless chicken but did ok for 2nd game back
 Lee: 4 disappointing again
 Referee: 5 some poor decisions
 Opposition: 3 fortunately worse than us
 0
- 
            MacG: 6.5 Looked a bit more convincing but distribution not so good.
 Clare: 6.5 Hit and miss
 Lavelle: 6 Did OK but was up against a difficult big man
 Purrington: 6.5 Defensively sound but rarely made a forward pass
 Dobson: 6.5 Usual performance but a couple of errors than usual. Didn't get booked!
 Matthews: 6.5 Did a decent job
 Gilbey: 7 Some good runs and a goal.
 Fraser: 7 Looks useful. Maybe more to come.
 B-T: 7.5 Made a difference
 Stockley: 6.5 Makes a nuisance of himself even when not on top attacking form
 Washington: 6.5 Some good runs. We seem to play better with Washington
 Lee: 4 Hmmm
 Referee: 5
 Opposition: 4
 0
- 
            MacG: 7 Early scare from a long throw but actually came out & caught two crosses.
 Clare: 6.5 One really crap attempt at a clearance
 Lavelle: 5 Didn’t win a header all night mainly because he was too slow getting to the challenge
 Purrington: 6 He loves a backwards pass
 Dobson: 7.5 Full of energy but another who made one awful pass that could have cost us a goal.
 Matthews: 7 Solid defensive performance & got forward
 Gilbey: 6.5 Some good runs but missed the target from two good chances
 Fraser: 6.5 Started really brightly but a few crap crosses
 B-T: 8 MOTM Solid in defence and caused them problems all night going forward
 Stockley: 5 Struggled to get into the game but some good headed clearances
 Washington: 6.5 Worried their defence all night
 Lee: 3 Kept losing the ball
 Referee: 5 Ok
 Opposition: 2 Awful
 0
- 
            MacG: 5 does not impress, letting a long throw bounce in the 6 yard box, really!
 Clare: 8 lots of effort and work rate
 Lavelle: 7 solid enough
 Purrington: 7
 Dobson: 8 motm
 Matthews: 5 don’t impress
 Gilbey: 6 only cos he scored
 Fraser: 5 anonymous
 B-T: 8 very bright we should have given him the ball more
 Stockley: 6.5 working hard
 Washington: 5 don’t know fit
 Lee: 2 he really is quite poor
 Referee: 8
 Opposition: 2 as poor as us if not worse1
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser: 6
 B-T: 7
 Stockley: 6
 Washington: 6
 Lee: 6
 0
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 7
 Dobson: 6
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser: 6
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 6
 Washington: 6
 Lee: 5
 Referee: 5
 Opposition: 4
 Pearce: n/a
 0
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6
 Lavelle: 7
 Purrington: 6.5
 Dobson: 7.5
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 7.5
 Fraser: 7
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 6.5
 Washington: 7
 Lee: 5
 Referee: 6
 Opposition:5
 0
- 
            MacG: 7
 Clare: 7
 Lavelle: 7
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 7.5
 Matthews: 7
 Gilbey: 7.5
 Fraser: 7.5
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 7
 Washington: 7
 Lee: 5
 Referee: 7
 Opposition: 6
 Pearce: n/a0
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 6.5
 Fraser: 6
 B-T: 7.5
 Stockley: 6
 Washington: 6.5
 Lee: 5.5
 Referee: 7
 Opposition: 5
 0
- 
            MacG: 7Clare: 7Lavelle: 7Purrington: 7Dobson: 8Matthews: 6Gilbey: 8Fraser: 6.5B-T: 8 MOTMStockley: 7Washington: 7Lee: 4Referee: 8Opposition: 3Pearce: n/a0
- 
Sponsored links:
- 
            MacG: 6.5
 Clare: 6.5
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 6
 Matthews: 6.5
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser: 7
 B-T: 7.5
 Stockley: 5.5
 Washington: 6
 Lee: 3
 Referee: 7
 Opposition: 3
 0
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare:6
 Lavelle:7
 Purrington:6
 Dobson: 6
 Matthews:6
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser:7
 B-T: 8
 Stockley:6
 Washington:7
 Lee: 3
 0
- 
            lancashire lad said:MacG: 6.5
 Clare: 7
 Lavelle: 7
 Purrington: 6.5
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 6.5
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser: 7
 B-T: 7
 Stockley: 6
 Washington: 6
 Lee: 5
 Referee: 6
 Opposition: 4
 Pearce: n/a
 0
- 
            MacG: 7
 Clare: 6
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser: 7
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 6
 Washington: 6.5
 Lee: 5.5
 Referee: 7
 Opposition: 5
 Pearce: n/a
 0
- 
            MacG: 6.5
 Clare: 6.5
 Lavelle: 6.5
 Purrington: 6.5
 Dobson: 7
 Matthews: 6.5
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser: 6.5
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 7
 Washington: 6.5
 Lee: 4
 Referee: 7
 0
- 
            MacG: 6 - Not a lot to do but better (ie coming for two crosses); distribution poor though
 Clare: 6.5 - Did OK
 Lavelle: 6 - Did OK but lost nearly everything in the air
 Purrington: 5.5 - Just about got through the game OK
 Dobson: 6 - Poor first half but much better near the end
 Matthews: 5.5 - Quiet game which is a bonus for him
 Gilbey: 7 - Could have had three and a yellow first half
 Fraser: 6 - Early knock hampered him but slowly getting into it
 B-T: 7.5 (MoM) - Did what you want from a winger; beat his man, good crosses, cut inside and shot, easy peasy!
 Stockley: 4.5 - Tried hard but rarely involved
 Washington: 6.5 - All action and showed real fight
 Lee: 4 - Oh dear. His ever decreasing circles mean he'll be up his own arse by the end of the season!
 Referee: 6 - Let a lot go which probably did us a favour
 Opposition: 3 - Poor, they never really tried to win it (when we were there for the taking)
 3
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6
 Lavelle: 6
 Purrington: 6.5
 Dobson: 7.5
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 7.5
 Fraser: 7
 B-T: 8
 Stockley: 6.5
 Washington: 7
 Lee: 5
 Referee: 7
 Opposition:5
 sat there hoping we could hand on against a team as poor as Gillinham! But still an improvement
 0
- 
            MacG: 5
 Clare: 5
 Lavelle:5
 Purrington: 5
 Dobson: 6
 Matthews: 4
 Gilbey: 6
 Fraser: 4
 B-T: 7
 Stockley: 5
 Washington: 5
 Lee: 5
 1
- 
            MacG: 6
 Clare: 6
 Lavelle: 7
 Purrington: 6
 Dobson: 6
 Matthews: 6
 Gilbey: 7
 Fraser: 6
 B-T: 7.5
 Stockley: 6
 Washington: 6
 Lee: 4
 Referee: 6
 Opposition: 3
 0
- 
            MacG: 6 Better than recently. Good to see him catching a couple of crosses. Distribution still not great though.
 Clare: 6 Some good, some bad, but generally solid.
 Lavelle: 6 Took time to settle, but grew into the game.
 Purrington: 6 Looked very solid.
 Dobson: 6 Usual solid performance, but far from his best.
 Matthews: 5 No attacking threat at all. Not a wing-back. Prefer DJ at RWB.
 Gilbey: 6.5 Much better from him and a goal too. Takes up some odd positions at times, which I think is why many, including me, say he often hides.
 Fraser: 7 You don't notice him much when he is on the pitch, but, boy, do you notice it when he is not on the pitch. Quietly and efficiently gets on with the job. I hope the injury isn't too bad.
 B-T: 7 Excellent first half, but faded badly second half otherwise would have been higher mark.
 Stockley: 6 Makes a difference at both ends of the pitch. Doesn't seem to be fully match fit yet.
 Washington: 6.5 Great to have him back. He makes such a difference. Second name on the team sheet (after Dobson) for me.
 Lee: 5 Not good at all. Seemed to be getting in the way. We noticeably got worse when he replaced Fraser
 Referee: 6 Okay. Let it flow more than some.
 Opposition: 4 Not good. You can see why they are in the relegation zone. I was really surprised that Neil Harris hadn't got them "up" for this. They seemed to be lacking effort as well as quality. made us look good!
 0















