Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Football League Play-Offs
Comments
-
Because the basis of football in this country is teams from specific places competing and moving up and down the leagues. That to me is a big part of what creates the atmosphere and passion in the sport. How could anyone genuinely support a team that might be from Wimbledon one year then transplanted to another part of the country. That goes against the beautiful game to me.Covered End said:
Franchise club yes. I can't see where you get anti football from.Gary Poole said:
Don’t disagree with your view on Wycombe but MKD are surly an anti football franchise clubCovered End said:Wycombe Wanderers are what I call an anti football team.
Come on MKD.2 -
Decent player McCleary1
-
I think the majority agree with that.Gary Poole said:
Because the basis of football in this country is teams from specific places competing and moving up and down the leagues. That to me is a big part of what creates the atmosphere and passion in the sport. How could anyone genuinely support a team that might be from Wimbledon one year then transplanted to another part of the country. That goes against the beautiful game to me.Covered End said:
Franchise club yes. I can't see where you get anti football from.Gary Poole said:
Don’t disagree with your view on Wycombe but MKD are surly an anti football franchise clubCovered End said:Wycombe Wanderers are what I call an anti football team.
Come on MKD.1 -
I will always be anti-MK and what happened to Wimbledon should never be allowed again.Gary Poole said:
Because the basis of football in this country is teams from specific places competing and moving up and down the leagues. That to me is a big part of what creates the atmosphere and passion in the sport. How could anyone genuinely support a team that might be from Wimbledon one year then transplanted to another part of the country. That goes against the beautiful game to me.Covered End said:
Franchise club yes. I can't see where you get anti football from.Gary Poole said:
Don’t disagree with your view on Wycombe but MKD are surly an anti football franchise clubCovered End said:Wycombe Wanderers are what I call an anti football team.
Come on MKD.
The club was founded in June 2004, turning 18 in a month. I look at their fanbase in the stands and probably half of them weren't even born in 2004... I can't knock them for wanting to follow their local team and what happened in the early 2000s is not their fault.
Hope the EFL/FA have learned the lesson and it never happens again but begrudgingly, I'm glad to see there's a generation of fans in the area not sucked into being Man U, Arsenal and Liverpool armchair fans.6 -
I'm fairly certain Wycombe go back to being irrelevant as soon as Ainsworth moves on - which could be this summer if they don't go up.
Otherwise, I'm fine with any of the other three getting promoted. They would all be a pain in the neck to play against next season.
1 -
Hang in there Wycombe. Proper football club.1
-
Agreed, the really crazy thing about it all is when Pete Winkleman and his cronies decided they wanted a football club in Milton Keynes they could have either set one up or pumped money into a none league local club and brought them up. 18 years later If they had done that I would think they would have been in at least as good a position as they are now, without having had stolen another club from their fans.Callumcafc said:
I will always be anti-MK and what happened to Wimbledon should never be allowed again.Gary Poole said:
Because the basis of football in this country is teams from specific places competing and moving up and down the leagues. That to me is a big part of what creates the atmosphere and passion in the sport. How could anyone genuinely support a team that might be from Wimbledon one year then transplanted to another part of the country. That goes against the beautiful game to me.Covered End said:
Franchise club yes. I can't see where you get anti football from.Gary Poole said:
Don’t disagree with your view on Wycombe but MKD are surly an anti football franchise clubCovered End said:Wycombe Wanderers are what I call an anti football team.
Come on MKD.
The club was founded in June 2004, turning 18 in a month. I look at their fanbase in the stands and probably half of them weren't even born in 2004... I can't knock them for wanting to follow their local team and what happened in the early 2000s is not their fault.
Hope the EFL/FA have learned the lesson and it never happens again but begrudgingly, I'm glad to see there's a generation of fans in the area not sucked into being Man U, Arsenal and Liverpool armchair fans.If it had happened 15 years earlier we could have been in Wimbledons position2 -
Fuck it I’m gonna say sumin positive.
Watching these two over the two legs (Wycombe & MK Dons) makes you remember how much of a sizeable club we are. The atmosphere we created home and away against Doncaster was 8 times what either of these ever have and ever could produce, this just looks to me like a run of the mill league game, no intensity filtering in from the crowd, you could almost cut it with a knife for us during the promotion season of 18/19, I hope we see some good times next season my god we need it.12 -
What is amazing is that MKD skipper Dean Lewington has played 29 games for Wimbledon before they moved and is still there and has played 44 games this season3
-
We could do with a few players like him, he's literally never injured.Gary Poole said:What is amazing is that MKD skipper Dean Lewington has played 29 games for Wimbledon before they moved and is still there and has played 44 games this season
Today is his 886th appearance in 19 seasons. In 15 of those seasons he played 46 games or more.2 - Sponsored links:
-
Fake club, robot players 😉Chris_from_Sidcup said:
We could do with a few players like him, he's literally never injured.Gary Poole said:What is amazing is that MKD skipper Dean Lewington has played 29 games for Wimbledon before they moved and is still there and has played 44 games this season
Today is his 886th appearance in 19 seasons. In 15 of those seasons he played 46 games or more.0 -
15 minutes plus added... MK pushing but no luck yet.0
-
Looks like they're going to hold on.0
-
FT 1-0. Wycombe in the play-off final.
MK-Wycombe
68-32 possession
29-2 shots
6-0 on target
18-1 corners5 -
Imagine watching Wycombe every week. Dear god, the epitomy of anti football.
5 -
Awful football. But I doubt the Wycombe fans mind. In fact, they probably love that they wind everyone up.Clem_Snide said:Imagine watching Wycombe every week. Dear god, the epitomy of anti football.0 -
Indeed .. and I’ve seen some of our fans suggesting Ainsworth as our manager. Thanks, but no thanksClem_Snide said:Imagine watching Wycombe every week. Dear god, the epitomy of anti football.2 -
Results over style2
-
Don't want Wycombe back in the Championship.
If I had to choose between the other two, I think I'd rather see Sunderland win than Sheff Wed. The Sunderland fans have done their time in this league, whereas Wednesday need a couple more seasons to really feel the effects of their points deduction.
But in priority order:
1. Sunderland
2. Sheff Wed
3. Wycombe3 -
Well done Wycombe they fought hard to get through tonight but they will do well to beat Sunderland or Wednesday at Wembley.0
- Sponsored links:
-
shirty5 said:Results over style
It's the shit housing that I can't stand. Time wasting from the off, rolling around on the deck constantly etc etc etc......it amazes me that referees fall for it. The constant whining and "conversations" which are all aimed at running the clock down.
5 -
Wish we would take note of some of that. Game management. Nicky Bailey could teach them a few tricks (Excluidng pens)Clem_Snide said:shirty5 said:Results over style
It's the shit housing that I can't stand. Time wasting from the off, rolling around on the deck constantly etc etc etc......it amazes me that referees fall for it. They constant whining and "conversations" which are all aimed at running the clock down.0 -
DISRESPECT.
MK "giving" the Wycombe faithful just 2,000 tickets and putting them in 2 sections of the Upper with a vacant block of seats between them.
And it came back to bite them on the bum.
Hmmm. Thoughts, anyone ?2 -
Sums up what a classless bunch MK areFanny Fanackapan said:DISRESPECT.
MK "giving" the Wycombe faithful just 2,000 tickets and putting them in 2 sections of the Upper with a vacant block of seats between them.
And it came back to bite them on the bum.
Hmmm. Thoughts, anyone ?3 -
Apparently both Sunderland and Sheffield Wednesday have done the same, just 2,000 away fans.Fanny Fanackapan said:DISRESPECT.
MK "giving" the Wycombe faithful just 2,000 tickets and putting them in 2 sections of the Upper with a vacant block of seats between them.
And it came back to bite them on the bum.
Hmmm. Thoughts, anyone ?
0 -
As did Wycombe in the first place to MKD.LargeAddick said:
Apparently both Sunderland and Sheffield Wednesday have done the same, just 2,000 away fans.Fanny Fanackapan said:DISRESPECT.
MK "giving" the Wycombe faithful just 2,000 tickets and putting them in 2 sections of the Upper with a vacant block of seats between them.
And it came back to bite them on the bum.
Hmmm. Thoughts, anyone ?1 -
Bit different when your stadium only holds about 9k thoughCovered End said:
As did Wycombe in the first place to MKD.LargeAddick said:
Apparently both Sunderland and Sheffield Wednesday have done the same, just 2,000 away fans.Fanny Fanackapan said:DISRESPECT.
MK "giving" the Wycombe faithful just 2,000 tickets and putting them in 2 sections of the Upper with a vacant block of seats between them.
And it came back to bite them on the bum.
Hmmm. Thoughts, anyone ?1 -
But surely their ground has far less capacity than MK's ?Covered End said:
As did Wycombe in the first place to MKD.LargeAddick said:
Apparently both Sunderland and Sheffield Wednesday have done the same, just 2,000 away fans.Fanny Fanackapan said:DISRESPECT.
MK "giving" the Wycombe faithful just 2,000 tickets and putting them in 2 sections of the Upper with a vacant block of seats between them.
And it came back to bite them on the bum.
Hmmm. Thoughts, anyone ?0 -
Yes it does, as does The Valley compared to Bournemouth.Fanny Fanackapan said:
But surely their ground has far less capacity than MK's ?Covered End said:
As did Wycombe in the first place to MKD.LargeAddick said:
Apparently both Sunderland and Sheffield Wednesday have done the same, just 2,000 away fans.Fanny Fanackapan said:DISRESPECT.
MK "giving" the Wycombe faithful just 2,000 tickets and putting them in 2 sections of the Upper with a vacant block of seats between them.
And it came back to bite them on the bum.
Hmmm. Thoughts, anyone ?
Yet, I still think our fans can remember and still have the hump with Bournemouth, when we gave them more than 3,000 for their promotion game in 2015.
We were mid table and it didn't matter if we gave them a slight edge with extra fans.
Yet Charlton fans heavily criticised Charlton over a meaningless game, but MKD should give extra for a vital game?
There's so many double standards going on today.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/32459759
0 -
Over the 2 legs MK had 36 shots on goal.........but only 7 on target.Callumcafc said:FT 1-0. Wycombe in the play-off final.
MK-Wycombe
68-32 possession
29-2 shots
6-0 on target
18-1 corners0
