Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
January Transfer Window - Jan 2023 (Deadline Day starts page 112)
Comments
-
would be seriously underwhelmed with that. What is our obsession with bringing former players back? I suppose it’s easier than actually doing any scouting. I’m assuming the black box is really an old HR filing cabinet.9
-
give it up for.....Andy!! Scott!!!!9
-
Bonne and L Taylor as our new strike force, just to piss virtually everyone off.
9 -
Bonne is bad and i really wasn't a fan of his before but thinking of it as long as we bring in 1 other striker who is more prolific/proven then having him there fighting behind for a spot isn't as bad I suppose...0
-
Mrkinski said:If we get MB as our much needed striker, we will quickly know the direction of travel for this incoming investment / takeover.0
-
Bonne has mugged the club off twice on social media. Fuck him, doesn’t get my support.21
-
cafcfan1990 said:Bonne still improves us IMO. I think people are put off by his comments towards us which is fair enough, but if we were signing another playing who had scored 12 last season, and 11 in 33 in the champ a couple of years ago I think we'd pretty happy.2
-
I don’t think Bonne is anywhere near as bad as people make out, he has scored goals more consistently throughout his career at a similar to higher level than Stockton for instance.He’s just a bit of a mug sadly.8
-
J BLOCK said:Bonne has mugged the club off twice on social media. Fuck him, doesn’t get my support.5
-
killerandflash said:cafcfan1990 said:Bonne still improves us IMO. I think people are put off by his comments towards us which is fair enough, but if we were signing another playing who had scored 12 last season, and 11 in 33 in the champ a couple of years ago I think we'd pretty happy.2
- Sponsored links:
-
Imagine the buzz when we take off Leaburn and bring on Bonne!2
-
cafcfan1990 said:killerandflash said:cafcfan1990 said:Bonne still improves us IMO. I think people are put off by his comments towards us which is fair enough, but if we were signing another playing who had scored 12 last season, and 11 in 33 in the champ a couple of years ago I think we'd pretty happy.
If he does come, and does not score though, forget this as I’ll be first in the queue to dish out some online verbals 😉
3 -
I would be ok with bringing him back tbh.
14 goals at Championship level, 12 last season for Ipswich.
At this stage, he'd be an upgrade on what we have from both a production (Stockley) and availability (Aneke) standpoint.9 -
We had QPR’s pants around their ankles when they took Bonne off our hands. Couldn’t get into their team back then and then had a loan at Ipswich who didn’t want him either. Might improve us slightly from a very low starting point but if Bonne is the total of our ambition we ain’t going anywhere.6
-
He’s not very good, but he’s better than stockley. At least he can move.3
-
ShootersHillGuru said:We had QPR’s pants around their ankles when they took Bonne off our hands. Couldn’t get into their team back then and then had a loan at Ipswich who didn’t want him either. Might improve us slightly from a very low starting point but if Bonne is the total of our ambition we ain’t going anywhere.3
-
Callumcafc said:I would be ok with bringing him back tbh.
14 goals at Championship level, 12 last season for Ipswich.
At this stage, he'd be an upgrade on what we have from both a production (Stockley) and availability (Aneke) standpoint.0 -
StrikerFirmani said:Callumcafc said:I would be ok with bringing him back tbh.
14 goals at Championship level, 12 last season for Ipswich.
At this stage, he'd be an upgrade on what we have from both a production (Stockley) and availability (Aneke) standpoint.0 -
cafcfan1990 said:ShootersHillGuru said:We had QPR’s pants around their ankles when they took Bonne off our hands. Couldn’t get into their team back then and then had a loan at Ipswich who didn’t want him either. Might improve us slightly from a very low starting point but if Bonne is the total of our ambition we ain’t going anywhere.
Hopefully we will be in a position to bring in some more ambitious targets by the summer (don't laugh).2 -
I'd be ok with Bonne in if it's in addition to another striker coming in too, with Kanu getting a loan out to develop further. For short term, I'd even accept that second striker to be a young player on loan from higher up, provided they have some talent and a bit of pace about them.
What's more pressing is a left back, and I'm praying we get one in by the weekend1 - Sponsored links:
-
Wouldn't be surprised if Bonne ends up back at Orient3
-
Salford city trying to sign Tony Watt.0
-
Bonne is better than Stockley . Would take him as a bench option on a short term contract .
0 -
I love the "Bonne will be okay if we bring another striker in too"......a lot of fans not quite got the jist of our objectives in the transfer market!4
-
JohnfromNorfolk said:Salford city trying to sign Tony Watt.
I'm sure he'd be good in our League.3 -
To be honest, if we signed Bonne, a player who scored 11 goals for us in the Championship and 12 for Ipswich in L1, for £200,00, sold him for up to £2m and then got him back on a free that's pretty incredible business.People seemed pretty happy with the idea of Nombe who scored 0 in 6 games the Championship and has 11 in 25 in L1 at the moment. Bonne scored 11 L1 goals in 15 games before tailing off last season and 5 in his first 8 Championship games for us (plus 3 after lockdown as he more or less single-handedly tried to score the goals to keep us up). He starts well and then tends to fall away but he's definitely scored goals which our miserable stack of nothings struggle with (Stockley 2 in 23, Chuks 1 in 9) so he'd be an improvement on what we have now. I've never really understood the animosity towards him to be honest, he got so much grief in the Championship but he scored, turned up and if we'd not been the victims of some ridiculous late Barnsley goals and Blackburn own goals we would have had him to thank more than most of the others in that team.I would like us to sign two strikers though, sadly moving Stockley out somewhere else to rebuild himself. Leaburn, Bonne and another plus the ghost of Chuks would be pretty handy.15
-
Left Back that would be known to Scott as from Forest.
Young, just signed a new contract (which for a PL kid usually means a loan around the corner), would be his first loan so likely would come cheap, Irish so Gavin, Casey and Molyneux could keep him in good company... Aaron Donnelly.
Not a rumour, just me putting 2+2and likely getting it wrong.2 -
ShootersHillGuru said:We had QPR’s pants around their ankles when they took Bonne off our hands. Couldn’t get into their team back then and then had a loan at Ipswich who didn’t want him either. Might improve us slightly from a very low starting point but if Bonne is the total of our ambition we ain’t going anywhere.arny23394 said:He’s not very good, but he’s better than stockley. At least he can move.
Never really rated him & thought we did really well getting £2m (?!) from QPR. He is probably a League 1/2 striker and seeing as we are bottom half League 1 he fits the bill. However, I wouldn't be happy if that was our only striker signing......and I'm sure it wont be.0 -
What is our obsession with signing ex players. Don't want someone who is offside every 2 mins. Don't see how he improves our attacking line8
-
If you decide to shop in Poundland you are limited to what you can get.
Bonne, although not ideal, is definitely an improvement on both Chuks and Stockley
Let us be honest anyone who can walk unaided is an improvement on Chuks, and Stockley with 1 goal from open play is hardly setting the world alight.
1