Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
CAST meeting with Jim Rodwell
Comments
-
Kap10 said:PragueAddick said:RickAddick said:Kap10 said:Tracy Crouch bill seems to have gone very quiet, do we think it will be acted up on
Long forgotten by government.
I suppose for some of us the quiet is disconcerting but of course Parliamentary procedure and timetable runs at its own speed.
Much needed and should have been tackled years ago, but I have little confidence that this government will do the right thing.
And as this is not a HoC thread, I will leave it there.1 -
RickAddick said:Kap10 said:PragueAddick said:RickAddick said:Kap10 said:Tracy Crouch bill seems to have gone very quiet, do we think it will be acted up on
Long forgotten by government.
I suppose for some of us the quiet is disconcerting but of course Parliamentary procedure and timetable runs at its own speed.
Much needed and should have been tackled years ago, but I have little confidence that this government will do the right thing.
And as this is not a HoC thread, I will leave it there.It also has to be said that before her, another Tory, Damian Collins, did a lot of good work, and it was he I think who first argued for a regulator. But for whatever reason, I think internal party politics ( Collins backed Bozo’s leadership run), his work lost traction, but Crouch picked it up.Both gave the matter a lot of thought and research and tackled head on the key question, how is football’s money distributed, and is it optimal overall for all the voters to whom football matters? While some Labour politicians have weighed in locally about the issues of clubs, especially in the North-West, they have failed to engage their brains with concrete policies thst would fix the game, as Tracey Crouch has done. The only MP who tried was “our own” Clive Efford, a decent guy IMO despite being a Spanner. you can find details of his bill online. Admittedly its something like 15 years old now but it always looked a bit naive to me. It swerved the issue of how exactly you’d impose its recommendations on football. (The fans’ golden share was the standout idea, but with no mechanics on how it would work).
It looks like Tracey Crouch’s bill has cross-party support, an increasingly rare thing in our tribal politics, and when that regulator’s office opens she deserves a medal the size of a football, and a statue of her in her Spurs kit outside White Hart Lane ( although I hear Daniel Levy is not a fan, can’t think why).
here endeth the lesson😉12 -
PragueAddick said:RickAddick said:Kap10 said:PragueAddick said:RickAddick said:Kap10 said:Tracy Crouch bill seems to have gone very quiet, do we think it will be acted up on
Long forgotten by government.
I suppose for some of us the quiet is disconcerting but of course Parliamentary procedure and timetable runs at its own speed.
Much needed and should have been tackled years ago, but I have little confidence that this government will do the right thing.
And as this is not a HoC thread, I will leave it there.It also has to be said that before her, another Tory, Damian Collins, did a lot of good work, and it was he I think who first argued for a regulator. But for whatever reason, I think internal party politics ( Collins backed Bozo’s leadership run), his work lost traction, but Crouch picked it up.Both gave the matter a lot of thought and research and tackled head on the key question, how is football’s money distributed, and is it optimal overall for all the voters to whom football matters? While some Labour politicians have weighed in locally about the issues of clubs, especially in the North-West, they have failed to engage their brains with concrete policies thst would fix the game, as Tracey Crouch has done. The only MP who tried was “our own” Clive Efford, a decent guy IMO despite being a Spanner. you can find details of his bill online. Admittedly its something like 15 years old now but it always looked a bit naive to me. It swerved the issue of how exactly you’d impose its recommendations on football. (The fans’ golden share was the standout idea, but with no mechanics on how it would work).
It looks like Tracey Crouch’s bill has cross-party support, an increasingly rare thing in our tribal politics, and when that regulator’s office opens she deserves a medal the size of a football, and a statue of her in her Spurs kit outside White Hart Lane ( although I hear Daniel Levy is not a fan, can’t think why).
here endeth the lesson😉
3 -
sillav nitram said:I guess my take on the interview, didn’t say anything alarming, nor did he say anything that was particularly inspiring or exciting.3
-
Talal said:sillav nitram said:I guess my take on the interview, didn’t say anything alarming, nor did he say anything that was particularly inspiring or exciting.0
-
Talal said:sillav nitram said:I guess my take on the interview, didn’t say anything alarming, nor did he say anything that was particularly inspiring or exciting.5
-
Kap10 said:PragueAddick said:RickAddick said:Kap10 said:PragueAddick said:RickAddick said:Kap10 said:Tracy Crouch bill seems to have gone very quiet, do we think it will be acted up on
Long forgotten by government.
I suppose for some of us the quiet is disconcerting but of course Parliamentary procedure and timetable runs at its own speed.
Much needed and should have been tackled years ago, but I have little confidence that this government will do the right thing.
And as this is not a HoC thread, I will leave it there.It also has to be said that before her, another Tory, Damian Collins, did a lot of good work, and it was he I think who first argued for a regulator. But for whatever reason, I think internal party politics ( Collins backed Bozo’s leadership run), his work lost traction, but Crouch picked it up.Both gave the matter a lot of thought and research and tackled head on the key question, how is football’s money distributed, and is it optimal overall for all the voters to whom football matters? While some Labour politicians have weighed in locally about the issues of clubs, especially in the North-West, they have failed to engage their brains with concrete policies thst would fix the game, as Tracey Crouch has done. The only MP who tried was “our own” Clive Efford, a decent guy IMO despite being a Spanner. you can find details of his bill online. Admittedly its something like 15 years old now but it always looked a bit naive to me. It swerved the issue of how exactly you’d impose its recommendations on football. (The fans’ golden share was the standout idea, but with no mechanics on how it would work).
It looks like Tracey Crouch’s bill has cross-party support, an increasingly rare thing in our tribal politics, and when that regulator’s office opens she deserves a medal the size of a football, and a statue of her in her Spurs kit outside White Hart Lane ( although I hear Daniel Levy is not a fan, can’t think why).
here endeth the lesson😉
I wish we had a system of yellow/red cards for this minority, rather than this blanket "behind closed doors" ban.
Sorry for the "off topic" comment - but I can't post it where it belongs, because the HoC is closed!!!5 -
N01R4M said:Kap10 said:PragueAddick said:RickAddick said:Kap10 said:PragueAddick said:RickAddick said:Kap10 said:Tracy Crouch bill seems to have gone very quiet, do we think it will be acted up on
Long forgotten by government.
I suppose for some of us the quiet is disconcerting but of course Parliamentary procedure and timetable runs at its own speed.
Much needed and should have been tackled years ago, but I have little confidence that this government will do the right thing.
And as this is not a HoC thread, I will leave it there.It also has to be said that before her, another Tory, Damian Collins, did a lot of good work, and it was he I think who first argued for a regulator. But for whatever reason, I think internal party politics ( Collins backed Bozo’s leadership run), his work lost traction, but Crouch picked it up.Both gave the matter a lot of thought and research and tackled head on the key question, how is football’s money distributed, and is it optimal overall for all the voters to whom football matters? While some Labour politicians have weighed in locally about the issues of clubs, especially in the North-West, they have failed to engage their brains with concrete policies thst would fix the game, as Tracey Crouch has done. The only MP who tried was “our own” Clive Efford, a decent guy IMO despite being a Spanner. you can find details of his bill online. Admittedly its something like 15 years old now but it always looked a bit naive to me. It swerved the issue of how exactly you’d impose its recommendations on football. (The fans’ golden share was the standout idea, but with no mechanics on how it would work).
It looks like Tracey Crouch’s bill has cross-party support, an increasingly rare thing in our tribal politics, and when that regulator’s office opens she deserves a medal the size of a football, and a statue of her in her Spurs kit outside White Hart Lane ( although I hear Daniel Levy is not a fan, can’t think why).
here endeth the lesson😉
I wish we had a system of yellow/red cards for this minority, rather than this blanket "behind closed doors" ban.
Sorry for the "off topic" comment - but I can't post it where it belongs, because the HoC is closed!!!5