Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Chuks

1454647484951»

Comments

  • Sort of related- why did NJ get booked? Are we paying the price for perceived ill discipline? 
    Jones got booked for over celebrating a goal...
    Seriously? Is that able to be a booking?
  • Sort of related- why did NJ get booked? Are we paying the price for perceived ill discipline? 
    Jones got booked for over celebrating a goal...
    Seriously? Is that able to be a booking?
    Left his technical area... So imagine yes... Its pathetic though
  • Sort of related- why did NJ get booked? Are we paying the price for perceived ill discipline? 
    Jones got booked for over celebrating a goal...
    Seriously? Genuinely not sure if you're joking.
  • Sort of related- why did NJ get booked? Are we paying the price for perceived ill discipline? 
    Jones got booked for over celebrating a goal...
    Seriously? Genuinely not sure if you're joking.
    Pretty sure he did... Swear it got mentioned on Commentary, think it was the third
  • That's pathetic.

    I can't wait for his celebration next week when Godden scores a last minute winner. Jones running up the touchline like Mourinho when Porto knocked Man U out.
  • I think we can appeal the Chuks sending off
  • we should appeal it, if we do he can play against Wrexham unless the appeal  is delt with before the game.
  • msomerton said:
    we should appeal it, if we do he can play against Wrexham unless the appeal  is delt with before the game.
    But then he'd miss both legs of the play offs if that happened. 
  • I think we can appeal the Chuks sending off
    We will . 
  • Sponsored links:


  • msomerton said:
    we should appeal it, if we do he can play against Wrexham unless the appeal  is delt with before the game.
    But then he'd miss both legs of the play offs if that happened. 
    Won't matter if he score hatrick against Wrexham and we go up automatically 


    😉
  • msomerton said:
    we should appeal it, if we do he can play against Wrexham unless the appeal  is delt with before the game.
    But then he'd miss both legs of the play offs if that happened. 
    Yes, that is the risk. So the question is how clear cut was the offence, having not watched the game I am guessing it is not.
  • League One referees are a law unto themselves.

    They feel it is their right to make guesses when they should really only give fouls or send someone off if they actually see something!

    And don't get me started about how they feel empowered by picking the extra time according to their whims!

    No chance for an appeal. They will all stick together!
  • edited April 21
    Just got back and watched the footage - still maintain he was stupid to have gotten into the situation. It was kicking off for 30 secs before the incident and I was screaming for him to walk away.

    BUT there is no way the eventual contact was a foul. Looking at the tv footage the Wycombe player just ran into him. It’s not Chuks fault he is a unit. Their player basically ran into a brick wall
  • That won’t be getting overturned, referees are so protected and there’s no clear and obvious error. 

    Stupid from Chuks in what could be his last moment in a Charlton shirt.

    Given how fragile he is I do not know why he came on with us already having won the game.
  • Why get involved when there is just a couple of minutes left and you are 4-0 up. Bonkers!
  • Sponsored links:


  • Question is why was the Wycombe player continuing to run at Chuks, when the ball has moved away across the pitch? 

    Dumb of the Wycombe player as they need Charlton to win or draw against Wrexham for any chance to get back into the promotion places. 
  • edited April 21
    Aneke must be free, by the year 1983!
    - Hugh Mundell
  • That is never a red and should be overturned. Leahy runs at him, if Chuks does drop the shoulder that’s probably because Leahy was running straight at him. Can’t expect him to just stand there and openly take the hit 
  • msomerton said:
    we should appeal it, if we do he can play against Wrexham unless the appeal  is delt with before the game.
    msomerton said:
    msomerton said:
    we should appeal it, if we do he can play against Wrexham unless the appeal  is delt with before the game.
    But then he'd miss both legs of the play offs if that happened. 
    Yes, that is the risk. So the question is how clear cut was the offence, having not watched the game I am guessing it is not.

    Not entirely sure you’re the person who should be advising us on this to be honest! 
  • Watch the Sky highlights in slow motion on YouTube.

    Chuks does look to initially foul him with his hands around his shoulders/neck while attemping the Chuks-Press. The argy bargy continued for a solid 20 seconds with both players wanting to show either who is stronger or who can outwit the ref.

    The official CAFC site states he was sent off for an 'off the ball incident'. If they can prove he did not lash out, it may help the appeal. We can't see this in the footage.


Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!