The way they have put it on the tweet suggests 433 but honestly who knows and most of the 1st half of the match thread will be people arguing if its 433, 442 or 352 or something different.
The way they have put it on the tweet suggests 433 but honestly who knows and most of the 1st half of the match thread will be people arguing if its 433, 442 or 352 or something different.
Cant see Tyreece starting in a midfield three though.
really don’t understand the over excitement from some about playing 442, it’s an outdated formation and totally unimaginative which won’t hold up over the course of the season
really don’t understand the over excitement from some about playing 442, it’s an outdated formation and totally unimaginative which won’t hold up over the course of the season
Does the formation really matter that much?
So long as the Midfield | Defence | Attack supports each other, and doesn't leave the other overloaded, a team should be able to get the job done - Its not like Footballers are restricted to areas of the pitch like in a game of Subbuteo
really don’t understand the over excitement from some about playing 442, it’s an outdated formation and totally unimaginative which won’t hold up over the course of the season
I think Wycombe could be one of the few teams you could actually get away with it against as they don't play through their midfield as much as other teams.
Comments
Abankwah - Hector - Jones - Thomas
Campbell - Dobson - Watson - Blackett-Taylor
Leaburn - May
5222?
hopefully May is up town WITH Leaburn, Campbell and CBT out on the wings
Guess it could also be 3-4-3?
Blackett-Taylor and Abankwah as Wing-Backs
Leaburn | May | Campbell as the front three?
So long as the Midfield | Defence | Attack supports each other, and doesn't leave the other overloaded, a team should be able to get the job done - Its not like Footballers are restricted to areas of the pitch like in a game of Subbuteo
CBT and Leaburn either side of May