Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sangaard did more damage to us than Duchaletet.

13»

Comments

  • I get that. But at that stage, to a lay person anyway, the situation was fairly quickly and reasonably easily rectifiable. It certainly isn’t now.

    Another way to look at it, is the package on sale in 2014 to RD , would be a pretty attractive purchase proposition to many in today’s market. I struggle to conceive of a way in which the club today can be made into anything resembling a palatable purchase for anyone with half a brain, let alone an attractive one. Hence we’re now destined for abyss, barring a miracle which is essentially a cryptocurrency billionaire from Sidcup. 
    Agree with that. Yet people have paid £12m for it, it seems. 
  • Agree with that. Yet people have paid £12m for it, it seems. 
    People plural being the operative word I suspect. No individual would. 
  • edited January 2024
    I feel that a London club with a decent stadium and only a couple of great seasons away from the premier league would always be an attractive proposition to someone, despite the reality we know. I suspect it's more likely to be an American these days with the interest a lot of them seem to have in the lower leagues now. Id be happy to entertain that for Charlton if the buyer was closer to a Ryan Reynolds/Rob Mcelhenney type than a Sandgaard.

    As Airman just alluded to, even at our lowest ebb someone was still willing to buy us. Unfortunately with our current owners the odds point to them being no better than Roland or TS. But, the next lot (or individual) could be more positive, and I think there will always be interest as long as there's a Charlton Athletic. 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!