Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Players Ranking - Jan 2024
JamesSeed
Posts: 17,380
With thanks to @lancashire lad for the stats, I thought it might be useful to list the players rankings at roughly half way through the season, and a little more than half way through the January window.
4 appearances minimum requirement.
Shows how much we miss Chuks.
Kanu had three or four extremely low low scores, which skewed his overall average.
Jones is clearly the highest rated defender.
Assimwe is more highly rated than Anderson, interestingly.
4 appearances minimum requirement.
- Aneke 6.83 (5 Apps)
- L Watson 6.67
- May 6.51
- Dobson 6.42
- AMB 6.37
- Jones 6.32
- McGrandles 6.20
- CBT 6.16
- Assimwe 6.13
- Leaburn 6.08
- T Thomas 6.08
- Hector 6.06
- Isted 6.02
- Ness 6.01 (6 Apps)
- T Watson 5.99
- Edun 5.98
- Camara 5.87 (4 Apps)
- Kanu 5.78
- T Campbell 5.73
- Fraser 5.64
- C Campbell 5.62
- Anderson 5.49
- Tedic 5.39
Shows how much we miss Chuks.
Kanu had three or four extremely low low scores, which skewed his overall average.
Jones is clearly the highest rated defender.
Assimwe is more highly rated than Anderson, interestingly.
4
Comments
-
JS: I'll be sending you my fee request in due course8
-
Lies, damned lies and statistics!! If Chuks or L Watson win player of the year I’ll eat my hat.1
-
Seems high for AMB. not been impressed this season3
-
6.37 is pretty average. That he's 5th is a reflection of how badly the rest of the squad has played...Pelling1993 said:Seems high for AMB. not been impressed this season2 -
A predictable, but nevertheless, disappointing set of low numbers there. I don't know how anybody else attaches meaning to their Statbank scores, but for me 6 is a kind of passable performance (it's the lowest score I think of being acceptable); seven is a good solid performance. Looking at that list, nine players haven't even averaged the minimum acceptable level and none have averaged scored that I'd think of as good. No wonder the 'disillusioned' thread was doing such a roaring trade the other day.0
-
6 for me is quite good. Seven is very good, and anything above that is outstanding.
5 is poor, but not awful.1 -
Reflects our position in the table0
-
For me the marks start at 5 That's what you get for turning up, not putting your shirt on back to front and remembering to tie your laces. You earn or lose marks from that point , 6 is a reasonable performance, 7 is good, 8 is very good, 9 is MOM material, 10 is exceptional (i.e. score a hattrick, make two goal line clearances and nut Steve Evans on the way off). By the same token, 4 is poor, 3 is very poor, 2 is majorly shite and 1 is Charlie Kirk.8
-
I usually start with 7 being the "standard" and adjust accordingly. Dont think this season I've given more than an 8 or lower than a 5.JamesSeed said:6 for me is quite good. Seven is very good, and anything above that is outstanding.
5 is poor, but not awful.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Yeah 5 is sort a bit poor, a bit average. Meh, in other words.wmcf123 said:
There should be something between poor and quite good surely . To me , 7 is good , 6 is mixed , 5 is poor .JamesSeed said:6 for me is quite good. Seven is very good, and anything above that is outstanding.
5 is poor, but not awful.0 -
Asiimwe being above Hector...says a lot. As does the fact that CBT is 8th and LW 2nd.0
-
Aneke 5 appearances lol not sure we can really judge much or say we miss him, pathetic0
-
Anyone who think we don’t miss Chuks is … I don’t know, deluded? Of course we miss him.johnnybev1987 said:Aneke 5 appearances lol not sure we can really judge much or say we miss him, pathetic2 -
He has been injured, its not like we had a choice. Yes he might have made a big difference and would have been handy to have along side Alfie. But still to be ranked no1 with 5 games is laughableJamesSeed said:
Anyone who think we don’t miss Chuks is … I don’t know, deluded? Of course we miss him.johnnybev1987 said:Aneke 5 appearances lol not sure we can really judge much or say we miss him, pathetic0 -
It’s just counting. I put 5 apps next to his score to highlight the fact that it’s only based on 5 matches.johnnybev1987 said:
He has been injured, it’s not like we had a choice. Yes he might have made a big difference and would have been handy to have along side Alfie. But still to be ranked no1 with 5 games is laughableJamesSeed said:
Anyone who think we don’t miss Chuks is … I don’t know, deluded? Of course we miss him.johnnybev1987 said:Aneke 5 appearances lol not sure we can really judge much or say we miss him, patheticIt’s not all that serious a deal though, and I don’t think anyone’s going to be voting him as our player of the season.3 -
Aneke played 5 games.
We won 3, drew 2, that's 11 points from 5 games and guaranteed automatic promotion form.
Can we say we miss him?
Yes without a shadow of a doubt.2 -
The trouble is of course we miss him regularly!Covered End said:Aneke played 5 games.
We won 3, drew 2, that's 11 points from 5 games and guaranteed automatic promotion form.
Can we say we miss him?
Yes without a shadow of a doubt.2
