Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Armando Broja Loan

Todds_right_hook
Posts: 10,885
Signs for Fulham on loan from Chelsea with a loan fee of £4m. Fine, but the less he plays, the less Fulham play!!
Is that the wrong way round? Surely, the more he plays, the less Fulham pay. What am I missing?
Is that the wrong way round? Surely, the more he plays, the less Fulham pay. What am I missing?
0
Comments
-
Todds_right_hook said:Signs for Fulham on loan from Chelsea with a loan fee of £4m. Fine, but the less he plays, the less Fulham play!!
Is that the wrong way round? Surely, the more he plays, the less Fulham pay. What am I missing?
Seems quite straight forward, unless I'm missing something (which is more than likely)0 -
surely that is right way around
if he plays loads for them, they pay Chelsea a higher fee
If he is crap and barely plays, then they pay Chelsea less1 -
Yeah, seems like a very normal thing in loans. I remember always reading it in football manager when I send someone out.0
-
Todds_right_hook said:Signs for Fulham on loan from Chelsea with a loan fee of £4m. Fine, but the less he plays, the less Fulham play!!
Is that the wrong way round? Surely, the more he plays, the less Fulham pay. What am I missing?But at this point, he's 22 and made almost 60 PL appearances so it's a bit different. Chelsea are probably more concerned about finishing above Fulham in the table than the playing time of a lad they're probably selling in the summer anyway. If he plays more for Fulham and they do well, they've at least made some extra cash out of it.1 -
£4 million loan fee. I’ll retire to Bedlam2
-
Fine, but the less he plays, the less Fulham play!!
Crikes, never seen the Premier League rules re-written due to a loan signing! Hopefully the reach 38 games this season.0 -
Callumcafc said:Todds_right_hook said:Signs for Fulham on loan from Chelsea with a loan fee of £4m. Fine, but the less he plays, the less Fulham play!!
Is that the wrong way round? Surely, the more he plays, the less Fulham pay. What am I missing?But at this point, he's 22 and made almost 60 PL appearances so it's a bit different. Chelsea are probably more concerned about finishing above Fulham in the table than the playing time of a lad they're probably selling in the summer anyway. If he plays more for Fulham and they do well, they've at least made some extra cash out of it.
Think about the likes of Chelsea and Man City as being an employment agency with plenty of young people waiting to be called up for short-term work placements.
0