Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

(Serious question&purpose) Why are people who are interested in railways considered odd?

I wouldn’t even post this if we hadn’t won ;) but this is a bit of research, so please reply any way you like. 

People “like” railways in various ways and some of them also build model railways. Why does it attract more derision than to those who gather around airports, or to other “collecting” hobbies such as stamps or old vinyl? And why is it apparently quite cool and admirable to restore an old car, but not an old locómotive? 

We invented the railway, and Thomas the Tank engine is a global phenomenon. Yet, as I’ve discovered, the contempt for adults who maintain an interest is stronger here than in Central Europe, even though in these countries the real enthusaists often look and behave much like their Brit equivs. The most convincing theories I’ve heard so far are: 
- Britain no longer  admires technical stuff the way the Germans (and Czechs) do
- it’s normal for kids (boys anyway, it s a male thing) to be interested, but they are expected to grow out of it when they discover girls. Those who don’t are suspected of not having fully grown up and fully socialised.

That rings true to me but among those who have something to say about it are Rod Stewart, Pete Waterman, and  -as I was recently amazed to discover - Roger Daltrey. Alĺ three build jaw- dropping model railway layouts. Rod Stewart was recently on the cover of Railway Modeller magazine. In what looked like the big finger to that theory, he described it as a greater honour than being on the cover of Rolling Stone. But Pete Waterman said that now it seems safe to “come out” (!!)  but that he didnt think RS would have admitted to this hobby 20 years ago. Jeff Beck on the other hand,  gave up music in the mid 80s and said he preferred to concentrate on restoring his old cars. Nobody thought that was weird, even if many fellow musicians were sad about it. I wonder what they’d  have said if he’d been restoring an old steam loco.

So, what do you think? I have no point or argument to make, I just want to get a better insight into how people look on this group , ranging from those who  just prefer to take the train when they can,  through to the ultra-obsessive hobbyists. 
«1

Comments

  • a lot of those other hobbies take place in the privacy of enthusiasts’ homes. Trainspotting is a public pasttime and therefore exposed to teasing by passer-by’s who don’t get the buzz and are knobs. I think there is a disproportionate number of neurodiverse train fancers too so when people meanspiritedly make fun they are as much making fun of trainspotters’ non typical personalities as the focus of their interests. 

    As for train sets, I think some  people feel they are toys for boys and not men. Any man with a train set much therefore be a a socially unappealing emotionally awkward virgin. 

    One trait of many autistic people is the dislike of unpredictable circumstances and things not being where they should be. So I do wonder if a train is a rather lovely bit of predictability…timetable vagaries aside, a train always arrives exactly on the tracks and leaves in exactly the same way. 

    All the above aside (and as a neurotypical man with an autistic son) I think there’s no harm in a bit of gentle self ribbing about trainspotting Charlton fans.


    Yes, I understand (in a very rudimentary way) that autistic people are drawn to railways because railways are (supposed to be :)) predictable and well-ordered. But, when it comes to the Charlton=trainspotters thing, why trains, rather than planes, stamps, or birds (feathered variety)? 
  • The answer is lost in the mists of time I suppose  but probably a Stripy Nigel (why not Stripy Herbert?) or Spanner (why not Tool or Chisel?) somewhere is to blame.
  • The dominant politics in this country decries public transport and thinks people who don't drive are failures. Given the cost for young people of insuring a car, it's another example of intergenerational unfairness. It stands to reason that the dominant ideas in a country shape it's attitudes. 
  • rananegra said:
    The dominant politics in this country decries public transport and thinks people who don't drive are failures. Given the cost for young people of insuring a car, it's another example of intergenerational unfairness. It stands to reason that the dominant ideas in a country shape it's attitudes. 
    Yep, that’s the answer to the question…
  • People view train spotters and lovers of railways as not as sexy as them.
    Trains are fab, but so indeed are buses, especially the route 202 which is almost my personal Uburr.
  • seth plum said:
    People view train spotters and lovers of railways as not as sexy as them.
    Trains are fab, but so indeed are buses, especially the route 202 which is almost my personal Uburr.
    Yep, I think something like that drives a lot of the derision. When I was a teenager I was careful never to admit in the same company that I was a fan of the Who, and of trains. I had a sense it wouldn't end well. That's why the news about Roger Daltrey sent me to sleep with a smile on my face. "Out of my brain, on the train" who knew the truth back then, eh? 🤣

    I read a comment about why restorers of cars don't get the grief that restorers of railways do. That car (or motorbike) is their own personal belonging. Rightly or wrongly people feel their car says something about them, even if within 5 minutes they'll see someone else in the same car; whereas if you rock up in a beautifully restored E-type, that, admittedly, is a statement, if nothing else a testimony to your craft skills. You help to restore the Tornado locomotive, that's a collective effort and you don't get to park Tornado outside your house, not even if you are Pete Waterman and largely financed it ;)
  • I think there are a number of factors, all of which can stand alone or overlap:-

    1. Its certainly true that interest in trains, particularly the logging of numbers (and the same is true of aircraft, buses. etc.) is a trait of neurodivergence.

    2. Intellectualism. An interest in engineering suggests intellect, and in many working class (educational)  environments, being the clever kid wasn't a particularly attractive trait. That may be changing as generations have developed higher aspirations. 

    3. Ownership. A car enthusiast can own a car and therefore an interest is personal. A trainspotter can't easily own a train, but if they do its as part of a group environment with other similarly blighted enthusiasts.

    Ultimately I think no. 1 is the driver. The collector of numbers that you see at the end of the platform, religiously jotting down the numbers, may have no connection with other enthusiasts who have an interest in engineering, architecture, design or any other factor that might spur an interest in trains, but all are lumped into the same boat.  

    All of these are my thoughts. None of this is backed up be any insight or research!
  • I think there are a number of factors, all of which can stand alone or overlap:-

    1. Its certainly true that interest in trains, particularly the logging of numbers (and the same is true of aircraft, buses. etc.) is a trait of neurodivergence.

    2. Intellectualism. An interest in engineering suggests intellect, and in many working class (educational)  environments, being the clever kid wasn't a particularly attractive trait. That may be changing as generations have developed higher aspirations. 

    3. Ownership. A car enthusiast can own a car and therefore an interest is personal. A trainspotter can't easily own a train, but if they do its as part of a group environment with other similarly blighted enthusiasts.

    Ultimately I think no. 1 is the driver. The collector of numbers that you see at the end of the platform, religiously jotting down the numbers, may have no connection with other enthusiasts who have an interest in engineering, architecture, design or any other factor that might spur an interest in trains, but all are lumped into the same boat.  

    All of these are my thoughts. None of this is backed up be any insight or research!
    That's a pretty good summary, I think, although you have - quite reasonably- focused on the literal train-spotter group, those who gather at the edge of platforms. They are at one edge of what seems like a wide spectrum of interest. I always maintained a reasonable level of interest in how the railway works, but for most of my adult life it wasn't a hobby in the sense of taking up significant amounts of time. I would just find any excuse to take a train, and if I find myself next to a line I tend to watch to see what kind of trains run on it. But I am also pretty well up on car brands and variants. And I can tell the difference at some distance  between a 737 and an A319. Does this make me "neuro-divergent?" I had to look up the definition and certainly it would be quite a late-life diagnosis😉
  • Sponsored links:


  • seth plum said:
    People view train spotters and lovers of railways as not as sexy as them.
    Trains are fab, but so indeed are buses, especially the route 202 which is almost my personal Uburr.
    ... Oh I dunno 'bout that.


  • Is this some sort of counseling session?
  • edited March 13
    The charlton= trainspotting formula that you queried in your second post here @PragueAddick is likely owing to our collective exposure to the rail network (currently known as Southeastern), certainly to a greater extent than Miillwall and Palace as we have a larger catchment area, historically better served by trains and before them, the trams. Railways literally comes with the territory.

    Charlton has been on 3 loop line routes (Bexleyheath/Sidcup/Woolwich) and the Blackheath tunnel means we have 2 trunk routes serving Charlton station. That's pretty good compared to probably 90% of other clubs isn't it?, even if the service is tired and less reliable than it should be.

    I would love to get away from Southeatsrrn personally- I find it decrepit and miserable- but the options are limited: North Greenwich provides a new route to the valley for some.  Car options are narrowing and out of fashion. Railways are part of our DNA and will remain so I think, while we're at the Valley, and trains continue to serve Charlton station.

  • edited March 13
    The charlton= trainspotting formula that you queried in your second post here @PragueAddick is likely owing to our collective exposure to the rail network (currently known as Southeastern), certainly to a greater extent than Miillwall and Palace as we have a larger catchment area, historically better served by trains and before them, the trams. Railways literally comes with the territory.

    Charlton has been on 3 loop line routes (Bexleyheath/Sidcup/Woolwich) and the Blackheath tunnel means we have 2 trunk routes serving Charlton station. That's pretty good compared to probably 90% of other clubs isn't it?, even if the service is tired and less reliable than it should be.

    I would love to get away from Southeatsrrn personally- I find it decrepit and miserable- but the options are limited: North Greenwich provides a new route to the valley for some.  Car options are narrowing and out of fashion. Railways are part of our DNA and will remain so I think, while vwe're at the Valley, and trains continue to serve Charlton station.

    Yes that’s probably right, especially for those of us brought up in SE London, and of a certain age. As a small kid trains brought me good things, trips to central London, the Zoo etc. Then later we had to learn the complexities of the system with 3 lines to Dartford and more, my school had a sport ground in Eden Park where we played cricket sometimes. If you were brought up in parts of London which had a Tube, which was basically everywhere else, that was not complex at all, and very boring. I guess still today you have to know how the whole thing works. Or you end up in Sidcup. ;)
  • Not sure that's such the case now. On YouTube there are now a lot of very popular channels dealing with trains and other forms of public transport. The opening of the Elizabeth Line or other new stations in London sees masses of young people gathering at 5am to be there, and they're not cliched trainspotter types either.

    There are a LOT of railway programmes on TV too. 
  • Not sure that's such the case now. On YouTube there are now a lot of very popular channels dealing with trains and other forms of public transport. The opening of the Elizabeth Line or other new stations in London sees masses of young people gathering at 5am to be there, and they're not cliched trainspotter types either.

    There are a LOT of railway programmes on TV too. 
    Very true. My son is heavily into trains and spends hours watching YouTube videos from various enthusiasts. His reaction to spotting one such YouTuber whilst travelling on a tube to Wimbledon last year was akin to what my reaction would be to bumping into Dave Grohl or Clive Mendonca. 
  • Before video games and the internet the majority of kids would find hobbies by collecting stuff like stamps, cigarette cards, butterflies, birds eggs and train numbers.  

    I dabbled in a few of these as well as collecting cacti - how odd, but as pointed out, train spotters congregate and so if you can't see the point of train spotting you can laugh at them as a group.  But no one would laugh today at the hobby of collecting Pokemon cards - unless they all turned up on station platforms to swap cards.




  • edited October 17
    .
  • I wouldn’t even post this if we hadn’t won ;) but this is a bit of research, so please reply any way you like. 

    People “like” railways in various ways and some of them also build model railways. Why does it attract more derision than to those who gather around airports, or to other “collecting” hobbies such as stamps or old vinyl? And why is it apparently quite cool and admirable to restore an old car, but not an old locómotive? 

    We invented the railway, and Thomas the Tank engine is a global phenomenon. Yet, as I’ve discovered, the contempt for adults who maintain an interest is stronger here than in Central Europe, even though in these countries the real enthusaists often look and behave much like their Brit equivs. The most convincing theories I’ve heard so far are: 
    - Britain no longer  admires technical stuff the way the Germans (and Czechs) do
    - it’s normal for kids (boys anyway, it s a male thing) to be interested, but they are expected to grow out of it when they discover girls. Those who don’t are suspected of not having fully grown up and fully socialised.

    That rings true to me but among those who have something to say about it are Rod Stewart, Pete Waterman, and  -as I was recently amazed to discover - Roger Daltrey. Alĺ three build jaw- dropping model railway layouts. Rod Stewart was recently on the cover of Railway Modeller magazine. In what looked like the big finger to that theory, he described it as a greater honour than being on the cover of Rolling Stone. But Pete Waterman said that now it seems safe to “come out” (!!)  but that he didnt think RS would have admitted to this hobby 20 years ago. Jeff Beck on the other hand,  gave up music in the mid 80s and said he preferred to concentrate on restoring his old cars. Nobody thought that was weird, even if many fellow musicians were sad about it. I wonder what they’d  have said if he’d been restoring an old steam loco.

    So, what do you think? I have no point or argument to make, I just want to get a better insight into how people look on this group , ranging from those who  just prefer to take the train when they can,  through to the ultra-obsessive hobbyists. 
    There is no way The Who front man or Rodders would have admitted train behaviour problems in their prime although Waterman I think has never kept it a secret. Its not really surprising what they admit to these days at the end of very successful  careers, all 3 of them are a tad strange.
    Jeff Beck never really gave up on music performed live and made albums well after the '80s.
  • Sponsored links:


  • https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/151239194#/?channel=RES_BUY

    Perfect for Charlton fans, live in a station....
    You wouldn't need to bother with an internet connection, just look out a window overlooking the train lines all day to satisfy your needs.
  • Try being into trains AND Star Trek.....
  • I think it's very trainsphobic to not accept train lovers in this day and age. 
  • edited October 17
    I’ve worked on the railway as an engineer for the last 24 years and have absolutely no interest in trains , it’s just my job , but many people I work with are absolutely obsessed with them to the point it winds me up . I’m sure it’s a mild form of autism.
    Sometimes it’s like being with Golf Bores who spend the evening in the pub talking about handicaps and points . 

  • I’ve worked on the railway as an engineer for the last 24 years and have absolutely no interest in trains , it’s just my job , but many people I work with are absolutely obsessed with them to the point it winds me up . I’m sure it’s a mild form of autism.
    Sometimes it’s like being with Golf Bores who spend the evening in the pub talking about handicaps and points . 

    Interestingly that's EXACTLY what Lyle Taylor said about football.
  • I’ve worked on the railway as an engineer for the last 24 years and have absolutely no interest in trains , it’s just my job , but many people I work with are absolutely obsessed with them to the point it winds me up . I’m sure it’s a mild form of autism.
    Sometimes it’s like being with Golf Bores who spend the evening in the pub talking about handicaps and points . 

    Interestingly that's EXACTLY what Lyle Taylor said about football.
    Yeah it’s kind of the same i suppose 
  • I wouldn’t even post this if we hadn’t won ;) but this is a bit of research, so please reply any way you like. 

    People “like” railways in various ways and some of them also build model railways. Why does it attract more derision than to those who gather around airports, or to other “collecting” hobbies such as stamps or old vinyl? And why is it apparently quite cool and admirable to restore an old car, but not an old locómotive? 

    We invented the railway, and Thomas the Tank engine is a global phenomenon. Yet, as I’ve discovered, the contempt for adults who maintain an interest is stronger here than in Central Europe, even though in these countries the real enthusaists often look and behave much like their Brit equivs. The most convincing theories I’ve heard so far are: 
    - Britain no longer  admires technical stuff the way the Germans (and Czechs) do
    - it’s normal for kids (boys anyway, it s a male thing) to be interested, but they are expected to grow out of it when they discover girls. Those who don’t are suspected of not having fully grown up and fully socialised.

    That rings true to me but among those who have something to say about it are Rod Stewart, Pete Waterman, and  -as I was recently amazed to discover - Roger Daltrey. Alĺ three build jaw- dropping model railway layouts. Rod Stewart was recently on the cover of Railway Modeller magazine. In what looked like the big finger to that theory, he described it as a greater honour than being on the cover of Rolling Stone. But Pete Waterman said that now it seems safe to “come out” (!!)  but that he didnt think RS would have admitted to this hobby 20 years ago. Jeff Beck on the other hand,  gave up music in the mid 80s and said he preferred to concentrate on restoring his old cars. Nobody thought that was weird, even if many fellow musicians were sad about it. I wonder what they’d  have said if he’d been restoring an old steam loco.

    So, what do you think? I have no point or argument to make, I just want to get a better insight into how people look on this group , ranging from those who  just prefer to take the train when they can,  through to the ultra-obsessive hobbyists. 
    There is no way The Who front man or Rodders would have admitted train behaviour problems in their prime although Waterman I think has never kept it a secret. Its not really surprising what they admit to these days at the end of very successful  careers, all 3 of them are a tad strange.
    Jeff Beck never really gave up on music performed live and made albums well after the '80s.
    I should have said "for a while". But definitely he gave up, I know this because around 83-84 I had a secretary called Jane who sometime hung out with him and some friends at his place in the North Downs. She insisted that he'd got sick of the music biz and was just happy restoring his cars. Which she thought was quite cool. I don't think she'd have had that opinion if he'd got them all round to see his model railway. But yes, by 1990, I had bought his new CD, and caught him when he came to Prague around 2011. Class act.
  • The recent Pete Waterman series on model trains was excellent 
  • I wouldn’t even post this if we hadn’t won ;) but this is a bit of research, so please reply any way you like. 

    People “like” railways in various ways and some of them also build model railways. Why does it attract more derision than to those who gather around airports, or to other “collecting” hobbies such as stamps or old vinyl? And why is it apparently quite cool and admirable to restore an old car, but not an old locómotive? 

    We invented the railway, and Thomas the Tank engine is a global phenomenon. Yet, as I’ve discovered, the contempt for adults who maintain an interest is stronger here than in Central Europe, even though in these countries the real enthusaists often look and behave much like their Brit equivs. The most convincing theories I’ve heard so far are: 
    - Britain no longer  admires technical stuff the way the Germans (and Czechs) do
    - it’s normal for kids (boys anyway, it s a male thing) to be interested, but they are expected to grow out of it when they discover girls. Those who don’t are suspected of not having fully grown up and fully socialised.

    That rings true to me but among those who have something to say about it are Rod Stewart, Pete Waterman, and  -as I was recently amazed to discover - Roger Daltrey. Alĺ three build jaw- dropping model railway layouts. Rod Stewart was recently on the cover of Railway Modeller magazine. In what looked like the big finger to that theory, he described it as a greater honour than being on the cover of Rolling Stone. But Pete Waterman said that now it seems safe to “come out” (!!)  but that he didnt think RS would have admitted to this hobby 20 years ago. Jeff Beck on the other hand,  gave up music in the mid 80s and said he preferred to concentrate on restoring his old cars. Nobody thought that was weird, even if many fellow musicians were sad about it. I wonder what they’d  have said if he’d been restoring an old steam loco.

    So, what do you think? I have no point or argument to make, I just want to get a better insight into how people look on this group , ranging from those who  just prefer to take the train when they can,  through to the ultra-obsessive hobbyists. 
    There is no way The Who front man or Rodders would have admitted train behaviour problems in their prime although Waterman I think has never kept it a secret. Its not really surprising what they admit to these days at the end of very successful  careers, all 3 of them are a tad strange.
    Jeff Beck never really gave up on music performed live and made albums well after the '80s.
    I should have said "for a while". But definitely he gave up, I know this because around 83-84 I had a secretary called Jane who sometime hung out with him and some friends at his place in the North Downs. She insisted that he'd got sick of the music biz and was just happy restoring his cars. Which she thought was quite cool. I don't think she'd have had that opinion if he'd got them all round to see his model railway. But yes, by 1990, I had bought his new CD, and caught him when he came to Prague around 2011. Class act.
    I only managed to see Jeff Beck live once, at a charity gig at Kenney Jones polo club in Surrey. He was absolutely fantastic and did a great version of A Day in The Life 
  • because of where we spend our Saturday afternoons 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!